On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Jon wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> Personally I would just say don't make delta-rpms for i386 and arm or just
>> have deltarpm=1 on those architectures by default.
>
> Or all architectures even.
> This sh
How many patches needed for the latest mule?
Are these[1] merged already?
[1]---http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/mule.git/tree/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-co
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> Personally I would just say don't make delta-rpms for i386 and arm or just
> have deltarpm=1 on those architectures by default.
Or all architectures even.
This should, in my opinion, be disabled by default.
The default-off
On 29 June 2014 15:34, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:20:44 -0700
> Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> > We can do this, but createrepo would need to store the checksum of 0
> > level compressed xz rpms in primary, which involve making createrepo
> > decompress each rpm and then recompress
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:59 AM, tspaul...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm a mule developer and fedora user. Recently, I noticed that the version
> of mule packaged with fedora is not only very behind the current upstream
> version but it is also orphaned. I'd like to take over maintaining t
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-06-30
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location:
#fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
This is a reminder of the upcoming QA meeting. Please reply to this
mail with any suggestions for ad
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 14:20:44 -0700
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> We can do this, but createrepo would need to store the checksum of 0
> level compressed xz rpms in primary, which involve making createrepo
> decompress each rpm and then recompress at level 0. Not sure what
> the infra folks think ab
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 10:59:22AM -0400, tspaul...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm a mule developer and fedora user. Recently, I noticed that the version
> of mule packaged with fedora is not only very behind the current upstream
> version but it is also orphaned. I'd like to take over maint
On 06/29/2014 04:36 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/29/2014 12:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jonathan Dieter
wrote:
2. RPM would also need to support signatures across the uncompressed
payload
as well as the compressed payload.
Well Florian said that only the header
Hi All,
I'm a mule developer and fedora user. Recently, I noticed that the version
of mule packaged with fedora is not only very behind the current upstream
version but it is also orphaned. I'd like to take over maintaining the
packaging of mule on fedora if there are no objections.
Thanks,
Ti
On 06/29/2014 12:32 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
2. RPM would also need to support signatures across the uncompressed payload
as well as the compressed payload.
Well Florian said that only the header is actually signed not the
payload. So this sh
On 06/29/2014 12:34 PM, drago01 wrote:
> Well they should (or have some other source of documentation) ... the
> config file isn't really the right place for documentation, given
> that it does not get updated once you have edited it once ... you will
> miss new options / changed semantics that way
drago01 gmail.com> writes:
> Well they should (or have some other source of documentation) ... the
> config file isn't really the right place for documentation, given
> that it does not get updated once you have edited it once ... you will
> miss new options / changed semantics that way.
Yes, th
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Andre Robatino
wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
>
>> All that being said, what is the criteria for getting a default
>> configuration line put into yum.conf?
>> I'd really like to get the deltarpm= line put in there.
>>
>>
>> File a bug report in yum bu
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:55 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> 2. RPM would also need to support signatures across the uncompressed payload
> as well as the compressed payload.
Well Florian said that only the header is actually signed not the
payload. So this shouldn't be necessary.
> 3. Deltarpm wo
Broken deps for i386
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.2.0-9.fc21.i686 requires libQGLViewer.so.2.3.9
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.i686 requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[PyQuante]
Rahul Sundaram gmail.com> writes:
> All that being said, what is the criteria for getting a default
> configuration line put into yum.conf?
> I'd really like to get the deltarpm= line put in there.
>
>
> File a bug report in yum bug tracker or Red Hat bugzilla against yum as
the component. Do
17 matches
Mail list logo
