Compose started at Tue Jul 1 08:15:03 UTC 2014
New package: backupninja-1.0.1-3.el7
Lightweight, extensible backup system
New package: calendar-1.28-1.20140613cvs.el7
Reminder utility
New package: freecolor-0.9.2-2.el7
Display memory information
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
800
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
254
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
135
Dne 30.6.2014 20:59, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
2) The fedora-release-$PRODUCT package (and possibly %post or systemd
snippets therein) will be responsible for the creation and maintenance
of /etc/issue, /etc/os-release and /etc/fedora-release-product (note:
there is no $ there. That's the
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Product_Requirements_Document
There is missing Atomic and/or
Hi,
I have a python module for review swap, hope someone can do me a favour,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
Thanks.
Thanks.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 18:19 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
Hi Christopher,
I have a python module for review swap, hope someone can do me a
favour,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689
I've taken it up. Can you please review vit in return? It's a really
quick review
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com wrote:
I've taken it up. Can you please review vit in return? It's a really
quick review too :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112072
No problem.
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
On 06/30/2014 04:27 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.6.2014 15:14, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 06/30/2014 03:48 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 06/30/2014 03:12 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Interesting, it breaks Ruby build it seems:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7090194
Not
- Original Message -
Greetings!
Fedora 21 Changes Freeze is currently scheduled to no earlier than
2014-07-08 [1] and we're getting closer to this date. Btw this is
also Fedora 21 Branch from Rawhide date.
The Fedora Changes Freeze is now set to 2014-07-08, so it's the same
as that no
On Út 1. červenec 2014, 11:31:35 CEST, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
Dne 1.7.2014 12:56, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 06/30/2014 04:27 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.6.2014 15:14, Panu Matilainen napsal(a):
On 06/30/2014 03:48 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 06/30/2014 03:12 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Interesting, it breaks Ruby build it seems:
Hi Sandro,
On Wednesday, 25 June 2014 at 15:50, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 25.06.2014 15:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Would anyone like to swap reviews?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1112864
elpa - High-performance library for parallel solution of eigenvalue
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/2014 04:26 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.6.2014 20:59, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
2) The fedora-release-$PRODUCT package (and possibly %post or
systemd snippets therein) will be responsible for the creation
and maintenance of
Dne 1.7.2014 14:37, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/2014 04:26 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 30.6.2014 20:59, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
2) The fedora-release-$PRODUCT package (and possibly %post or
systemd snippets therein) will be
2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in his
private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for the only
package Hubert maintained - RabbitMQ server.
Hello,
Recently I've been working on Koschei - a new continuous rebuilding tool for
Fedora and I'd like to announce it publicly and get some feedback.
How will it work?
It will have a set of tracked packages for which it will watch dependency
updates and will (scratch) rebuild packages in Koji
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 11:35:20 -0600
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 19:23:04 +0200
drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Why?
My understanding of the process as it exists:
Download drpm.
Take drpm contents + old
On 06/30/2014 07:20 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bastien Nocera (bnoc...@redhat.com) said:
Apparently, people can still file bugs for dead packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114180
And I (and many others) get CC:ed on those bugs files, with
no possibility to remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 29 Jun 2014 20:01:04 -0500
Jon jdisn...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
smo...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Personally I would just say don't make delta-rpms for i386 and arm
or just have
We have three open seats on FESCo, the Fedora Engineering Steering
Committee. The policy for filling open seats states that we first check with
the runners-up from the previous election; as they have declined, the policy
is for FESCo to select replacements. We've decided that an open election is
Hi Michael,
it sounds like a way how one could automatically handle library so-bumps
in rawhide. Idea discussed with hhorak, jzeleny, pingou and others was
to bump the library package, rebuild the dependency tree depending on
this library and if some of them fail, notify it's maintainer(s) and
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version is also three
years behind upstream, therefore I am not convinced it is
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105945
I applied your patch but then noticed that the version
KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for
Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed
release), extending the same rationale per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/Update_policy
There have been kde-4.13.1 packages available for
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 10:13 -0400, Michael Simacek wrote:
Hello,
Recently I've been working on Koschei - a new continuous rebuilding tool for
Fedora and I'd like to announce it publicly and get some feedback.
How will it work?
It will have a set of tracked packages for which it will watch
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 12:17 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for
Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed
release), extending the same rationale per
On Wed, Jul 02, 2014 at 12:47:57AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 06:28:58PM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
alliance chitlesh, tnorth
The following packages are orphaned or did not build for two
releases and will be retired when Fedora (F21) is branched, unless someone
adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do
so now with a proper reason:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:55:23 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in
his private email). So it's time to change a poit of contact for
the only
2014-07-01 21:58 GMT+04:00 Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com:
On Tue, 1 Jul 2014 16:55:23 +0400
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-06-24 13:50 GMT+04:00 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com:
Hello All!
As fas as we know Hubert quit Fedora for a very long time (said in
his private
On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 19:19 +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
Sounds a lot like what openSUSE's Open Build Service does. I think
they
automatically trigger rebuilds of dependees when a provide they depend
on goes away due to a rebuild, so SONAME bumps are a breeze.
Yes, soname bumps are
The python-ZODB3 package, which I maintain, has been split into pieces. I
need several package reviews to get all the new pieces into place. I am happy
to swap reviews for these, but the number of reviews I need is sufficiently
large that it will take me a little time to get to all of the
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is
automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that.
I've always found it really strange how so many people talk about
rebuilding for soname bumps. The
Hi,
I plan to retire fuse-smb which allows to mount SMB/Samba shares as
local directories before F21 is branched (2014-07-08).
There have been no new versions since 2008 and the maintainer is not
going to fix problem with crashes related to multi threading issues in
libsmbclient 3.2+. There had
Hi every one ,
This commit add number after %{?dist} .. is this OK !!
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=c2f0d77aba7a2b745886654c42c943f6a9c1a4b7
See full package name
http://fr2.rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/fedora/devel/rawhide/src/g/gnulib-0-8.20140504git.fc21.1.src.html
Reposted from http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-07-01/.
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to follow it all. This series
highlights interesting happenings in five different areas every week.
It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just quick summaries with links
to each. Here are the five
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2014-07-02 17:00 UTC'
Links to all tickets
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 5:02 PM, مصعب الزعبي moc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi every one ,
This commit add number after %{?dist} .. is this OK !!
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=c2f0d77aba7a2b745886654c42c943f6a9c1a4b7
Yes, it's fine.
josh
--
devel mailing list
Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org writes:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014, at 12:53 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Yes, soname bumps are nonevents with OBS, since everything is
automatically rebuilt. Sounds like Koschei is a big step towards that.
I've always found it really strange how so many people
Yes, it's fine.
If you want to avoid such bump you shouldn't use %tag, just fill in
the number. I couldn't see the reason of using this one-off macro.
Release: %{tag}.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}
to
Release: 8.%{gitdate}git%{?dist}
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
Noob here.
http://cicku.me
--
Swap ZODB, sphinx-rtd-theme and BTrees with
1. osh - V6 Thompson Shell Port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115121
2. zsh-lovers - A collection of tips, tricks and examples for the Z shell
(This package is pretty easy as it only contains a manpage)
The simple solution to this is for me to just rebuild against 4.8.3, but
upstream said that in Debian they package the GCC plugins in
/usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y/plugin instead of /usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y.z/plugin so
that it doesn't break when there are minor version upgrades like this. Is
doing something
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=906396
lnie l...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@redhat.com
--- Comment #4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114859
Bug ID: 1114859
Summary: perl-CPAN-Meta-Check-0.009-1.fc21 fails to bootstrap
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Meta-Check
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114859
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115041
Bug ID: 1115041
Summary: perl-DBD-CSV-0.43 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-CSV
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
The standalone spec file and file from source RPM differ. I will use the
standalone one for this review.
The URL and Source0 are usable. Ok.
The source archive is original (SHA-256:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115055
Bug ID: 1115055
Summary: perl-Pod-Usage-1.64 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Usage
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115055
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115055
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Pod-Usage-1.64-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Usage-1.64-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115041
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088892
--- Comment #3 from Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me ---
*** Bug 1084382 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084382
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076569
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1076569
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-WebService-Linode-0.20-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WebService-Linode-0.20-1.fc20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1088892
Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #10 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
Fixed the long description and adjusted license tag.
Updated version:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora20/testing/perl-Time-ParseDate.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029710
Steve Tindall s10...@elrepo.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(s10...@elrepo.org |
|)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115055
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
60 matches
Mail list logo
