16.4.2014 23.20, Matthias Runge kirjoitti:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:33:50AM +0300, Anssi Johansson wrote:
I'm still of the opinion that if a package in EPEL is no longer
maintained and it has known security issues, it should be removed
from EPEL.
That will happen, in the next few weeks, as
Due to the holiday in the US and no real agenda for today i'm canceling
the meeting for today.
Continued next week.
Thanks everyone!
Regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
Red Hat GmbH |
On Ter, 2014-07-01 at 12:17 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
KDE SIG has been discussing moving forward with another kde x.y+1 update for
Fedora 20, largely due to it's extended lifetime (and f21's delayed
release), extending the same rationale per
Am 04.07.2014 12:02, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
http://apt.kde-redhat.org/apt/kde-redhat/fedora/kde.repo
have 3 repos is to use kde stable ? this will equal to future Fedora
20 , with kde 13 , many years ago I try use kde-redhat and I saw that a
quite different filosofy that was in Fedora
in the
On 07/02/2014 11:10 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 07/01/2014 11:31 AM, Marcela Maslanova wrote:
Env and Stacks Working Group has noble plan to make development in
Fedora easier and also work with new technologies, which are not in
Fedora yet.
The whole statement can be found here:
Hi all.
I would like to announce my candidature for FESCo member. Besides goals I'm
interested [1] in I would like to stress, that I'm prepared to fight for
changes,
that would be beneficial for Fedora users and developers.
I don't want to make decisions on any topic without prior research and
On 07/03/2014 09:32 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 03.07.2014 15:39, Rex Dieter wrote:
I'm looking into providing a predefined firewalld service definition for
kde-connect, per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115547
Looks like it's as easy as dropping an xml snippet into
Dne 4.7.2014 02:06, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
Hi,
looks like something I might use for development of Python software.
But for this to be truly useful, I'd need a bunch of stuff on top,
at least numpy/scipy, but also pytables, matplotlib. Without that it
would be even hard to
Hi,
a small summary about Rebase-helper project.
The purposeoftherebase-helper is to save developer'stime during package
rebases.
Rebase-helper is intended to be run in the cloned (Fedora) package repo
and needs only the path to the archive (tarball) withnew upstream
sources. The rest is
On Jul 4, 2014 4:39 PM, Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
a small summary about Rebase-helper project.
The purpose of the rebase-helper is to save developer's time during
package rebases.
Rebase-helper is intended to be run in the cloned (Fedora) package repo
and needs only the
I'm seeing this message:
extracting debug info from
/home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-isl.so.4
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit: -b arg has to be either the same length as -d arg, or
more than 1 char longer
but only on some
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 17:01:00 +0100
David Howells dhowe...@redhat.com wrote:
I'm seeing this message:
extracting debug info
from
/home/dhowells/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/cross-gcc-4.9.0-2.fc21.x86_64/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9.0/libcloog-isl.so.4
/usr/lib/rpm/debugedit:
-b arg has to be
Dear all,
Following the approval of the Simple Patch policy, all the necessary
pieces are now in place.
* The policy can be read at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_simple_patches
* The bug tracking simple patch requests is
On Thu, 03 Jul 2014 17:20:58 +0200
jpac...@redhat.com jpac...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Michael,
Detecting soname bumps and doing real rebuilds
instead of scratch build should be possible. Koschei could
automatically start rebuilding dependent packages AFTER you update
the library in
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
as a user or root? IIRC building as root leads to strange errors
sometimes
As a user in both cases.
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
The following F21FTBFS patches have been waiting for review for at least
a week:
ax25-tools: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105990
banshee-community-extensions:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105994
buildbot:
IMO q(pkgdb: q) lang should be obsoleted by the pure(pkgdb: pure) lang
pointed out by upstream many years ago.
For those compat-gcc* packages, shouldn't they be retired?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-07-07
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
Many thanks to Mike for running the meeting last week! I'd like to
propose another this week to
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
The simple solution to this is for me to just rebuild against 4.8.3, but
upstream said that in Debian they package the GCC plugins in
/usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y/plugin instead of /usr/lib/gcc/.../x.y.z/plugin so
that it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc20
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.fc19
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el6
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067003
--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 5.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Time-ParseDate-2013.1113-2.el5
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115913
--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com ---
I am not able to reproduce the error.
Could you please provide me output of following command?
strace -ff -b execve -e trace=execve xdg-open some.png
--
You are receiving this
This has taken a bit longer than I wanted it to but we have a mostly
working taskotron dev instance at:
https://taskotron-dev.fedoraproject.org/
This is 100% deployed from infra's ansible repo but other than the
proxy configuration for resultsdb, it should be pretty much the same
thing as what's
25 matches
Mail list logo
