On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 09:43:14AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump,
> deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11.
Thank you.
I noticed, you're a bit quick in pushing updates to stable releases.
When pushing to older b
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 09:27:12PM -0500, Derek Pressnall wrote:
> > The Fedora packaging process can be a bit tricky the first time
> > around; I'd recommend locating a member of the Fedora Sponsors who is
> > interested in helping you with your first package and showing you the
> > ropes.
>
> Ok
On 07/28/2014 10:40 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto:
No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If
upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for
Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means
having t
Hi Derek, you can view a detailed list of the available sponsors in
our Fedora accounts system, looking for the packager group and after
clicking in "sponsors" (there are some filters, administrators,
sponsors, users), then choose someone and send an email to him or
her.
One thing more. the best
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> The Fedora packaging process can be a bit tricky the first time
> around; I'd recommend locating a member of the Fedora Sponsors who is
> interested in helping you with your first package and showing you the
> ropes.
>
Ok, where do I fi
On Jul 28, 2014, at 17:11, Will Woods wrote:
> You're not quite right about how the overlay works.
>
> The default in-memory overlay is just 512MB. And the device-mapper docs
> note that "if it fills up the snapshot will become useless and be
> disabled, returning errors."[1].
>
> You should al
Hi all,
Thanks for your comment. Those 2 updates was already canceled
yesterday as I've realized the problem after Sandro's bug report.
TL;DR: Updates revoked, rawhide+f21 reverted to 0.12 without bump,
deciding if we need to add epoch to revert back to 0.11.
It's tricky now.
1. Upstream change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/28/2014 04:18 PM, Derek Pressnall wrote:
>
>
> I have a question about contributing a package to Fedora. Is it
> common for the author of an open source package to act as package
> maintainer? Or is it better to have someone else be the packag
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 09:37 -0500, Major Hayden wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> I'm working with F20 and CentOS 7 to create some live booted images.
> I'm not looking to do live USB/CD media, but rather boot a server over
> the network with a kernel, initramfs, and squashfs. It's working well
> so far,
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:18:04 -0500
Derek Pressnall wrote:
> I have a question about contributing a package to Fedora. Is it
> common for the author of an open source package to act as package
> maintainer? Or is it better to have someone else be the package
> maintainer (who is more experienced
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:20:22 -0500
> Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> > Should I just leave it in testing forever? Unpush it?
>
> If there's a newer one, unpush the old one.
>
> I was wondering under what circumstances it was appropriate to unpush an
Il 28/07/2014 18:02, Miloslav Trmač ha scritto:
> No, that would completely defeat the point of the soname. If
> upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for
> Fedora to patch the software to use them properly, even if it means
> having to continue to patch it. IIRC we do have
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:20:22 -0500
Richard Shaw wrote:
> Should I just leave it in testing forever? Unpush it?
If there's a newer one, unpush the old one.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
I have a question about contributing a package to Fedora. Is it common for
the author of an open source package to act as package maintainer? Or is
it better to have someone else be the package maintainer (who is more
experienced with the Fedora build processes)? I'm the author of a backup
utili
Should I just leave it in testing forever? Unpush it?
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Done, as the POC is ok and you're involved upstream, this should be no problem.
Please refer to the ticket for details.
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-c
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 12:02:24 -0400 (EDT), Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> If upstream won’t use sonames or symbol versioning, it’s better for Fedora to
> patch the software to use them properly, even if it means having to continue
> to patch it. IIRC we do have various packages that have to do this.
>
Hi Fedora community,
My name is Irina Boverman (user name irina). I am working for Red Hat and
maintaining qpid/messaging related packages for Red Hat products. My experience
with RPMs is recent, but I was a software developer in the past. I would like
to assist (become co-maintainer for the qpi
Am 28.07.2014 18:16, schrieb Jiri Popelka:
> At the moment dhcp package contains dhcpd (dhcp server) and dhcrelay (dhcp
> relay agent).
> I'd like to move dhcrelay into separate subpackage and rename the
> (sub)package with dhcpd to something better then
> 'dhcp'.
>
> Now the question is how t
- Original Message -
> On 25 Jul 2014, at 07:52, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > Summary:
> >
> > Mattdm then followed with 2 1/2 additional topics:
> >
> > 1a. Identifying different Fedora products -- fedora-release-*
> > contents and /etc/os-release
>
> As I understand it, you are trying to deci
Hi all,
At the moment dhcp package contains dhcpd (dhcp server) and dhcrelay
(dhcp relay agent).
I'd like to move dhcrelay into separate subpackage and rename the
(sub)package with dhcpd to something better then 'dhcp'.
Now the question is how to call the new subpackages.
Given that package w
On Mon, 2014-07-28 at 12:02 -0400, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > > As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> > > 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
On Jul 28, 2014, at 10:55, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>
> I am not completely if it is this issue you are seeing, but a squashfs image
> takes more memory then the image itself, becasue you first need to unsquash
> (in ram) and the load the fs pages into ram.
> Also take a look here:
> http://dumm
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> > As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> > 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> > now on. This has caused bug 1123785
>
> > so I will bump the
> Hello there,
>
> I'm working with F20 and CentOS 7 to create some live booted images. I'm not
> looking to do live USB/CD media, but rather boot a server over the network
> with a kernel, initramfs, and squashfs. It's working well so far, but I have
> a filesystem issue that I can't seem to
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:25:11PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24.7.2014 11:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>>On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0
Release announcement:
http://dnf.baseurl.org/2014/07/28/dnf-0-5-5-and-core-dnf-plugins-0-1-2-released/
Ales
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hello there,
I'm working with F20 and CentOS 7 to create some live booted images. I'm not
looking to do live USB/CD media, but rather boot a server over the network with
a kernel, initramfs, and squashfs. It's working well so far, but I have a
filesystem issue that I can't seem to fix.
My bu
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:00 PM, wrote:
> Change in package status over the last 168 hours
>
>
> 34 packages were orphaned
> -
> cln [el5] was orphaned by kevin
> Class Library for Numbers
> https://admin.fedorapr
Dne 24.7.2014 11:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Good Morning everyone!
In the version
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
34 packages were orphaned
-
cln [el5] was orphaned by kevin
Class Library for Numbers
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cln
clucene [f21, f19, master, f20
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 2:53 PM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
> manually:
>
> libjson-c.so.2.0.1->
Le 28/07/2014 16:03, Peter Robinson a écrit :
>>> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
>>> releases (was it?),
>>
>> Two updates have been filed hours ago,
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
>> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
>> releases (was it?),
>
> Two updates have been filed hours ago,
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.el6
>
> and it seems the upgrade
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
> manually:
>
> libjson-c.
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 15:36:48 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> If the udpate broke packages: a) it should not have been updated on stable
> releases (was it?),
Two updates have been filed hours ago,
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/json-c-0.12-1.fc20
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/u
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785
> so I will bump the soname manually
I'm sorry, wat
Le 28/07/2014 14:53, Christopher Meng a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
> manually:
Please consider reverting to 0.
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 11:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> libibverbs
> libmlx4
> libmthca
Taken.
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
Hi,
As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
now on. This has caused bug 1123785 so I will bump the soname
manually:
libjson-c.so.2.0.1->libjson-c.so.3.0.0
Potentially affected:
abrt-plugin-bodhi-0:2.2.2-4.f
Le 2014-07-28 12:18, Peter Robinson a écrit :
Apparently it's:
# repoquery --whatrequires libtracker-sparql-1.0.so.0
media-explorer-0:0.4.4-10.fc21.i686
nautilus-0:3.13.2-2.fc21.i686
tracker-devel-0:1.0.2-2.fc21.i686
So I've bumped and have them building atm.
Peter
I got an alert for bijiben
WRT discussion on the WG meeting about adding systemd to comps to block
fakesystemd [1] installation to real OS - systemd is in @core group
since F14 [2].
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1118740
[2]
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/comps.git/commit/?id=4e79f60c30b1cb6db55b11de
On 07/26/2014 03:09 PM, Gerard Ryan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're trying to retire package eclipse-wtp-common on F21 and Rawhide. My
> understanding is that this should be done F21 first, then Rawhide. F21
> has proven problematic so far.
AFAIK maintainers can retire packages only in rawhide. For F21 y
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
> Sorry about this. Peter Robinson sent me mail about this issue.
> I've updated tracker to 1.1.1 from 1.0.2, but have not announced this.
>
> We need to rebuild brasero, rygel and some packages. We should have no
> issues here.
Apparently it
Sorry about this. Peter Robinson sent me mail about this issue.
I've updated tracker to 1.1.1 from 1.0.2, but have not announced this.
We need to rebuild brasero, rygel and some packages. We should have no
issues here.
Again sorry about this.. =(
--
-Igor Gnatenko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lis
Compose started at Mon Jul 28 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc
On Sat, 2014-07-26 at 11:17 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> The following packages are looking for a new point of contact on at
> least one branch:
>
> babl
> gegl
I've taken these two.
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase
Red Hat a lit
WG meeting will be at 13:00 UTC (14:00 London, 15:00 Brno, 9:00 Boston,
22:00 Tokyo) in #fedora-meeting on Freenode.
= Topic =
* Docker
* [RFE] Teach COPR build layered Docker images - discussed on Copr
mailing list. Some follow up?
* Taskotron
* anything new with rpmgrill?
--
devel mailing
On Fri, 2014-07-25 at 22:01 +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I took the review of python-{botocore,jmespath,bcdoc} and awscli.
I'm wondering if you'd be willing to (co-)maintain the packages as well,
given you previous interest in awscli?
>
> Regards,
> H?
Thank you,
Lubo
--
devel mailing list
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2014 7:17:24 PM
> Subject: Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola (fas: deji)
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 09:01:33 -0600
> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Jun 2014 22:03:30
50 matches
Mail list logo
