Re: Dash as default shell

On Thu, 2 Oct 2014 14:12:12 +0100 "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > I'd be curious of the results if someone wants to take a stock Fedora 21 > install and switch /bin/sh to point to dash and report if they can still > boot & login to GNOME. I did a smaller run on a server without GNOME. Had to chage

Re: No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?

Hi On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Patrick Laimbock wrote: > That's good to hear. I didn't know that a (core) component during the > dev cycle needed to go through the karma process so thanks for pointing > that out. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/Branched explains the process Rah

Re: No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?

Hi Stephen, On 10/10/2014 07:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: [snip] > According to > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-11757/mesa-10.3-1.20140927.fc21 > it only reached the stable karma threshold yesterday, so it will hit the > mirrors sometime tomorrow, most likely. That's go

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) Available Now!

As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:4 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing

Re: Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?

On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 15:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be > 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 > this morning. > > Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two > th

Re: Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 15:57:12 +0100, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two th

Re: No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?

On Fri, 2014-10-10 at 18:03 +0200, Patrick Laimbock wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering why Mesa 10.3-1 (so not the rc3 but the official 10.3 > release) has not made it to F21. It fixes a bunch of crashes with Radeon > r300 (and hence gnome-shell) for me. > > Thanks, > Patrick According to http

Self Introduction Carlos Morel-Riquelme

Hi folks, mi name is carlos morel-riquelme, i start using linux since 2008 with ubuntu but i change to fedora since fedora 15, now in fedora always try to collaborate in testing and translate to spanish some wiki pages. Now i made a little Ruby app it's my first package for fedora so, i need to so

No Mesa 10.3-1 in F21 (instead of rc3)?

Hi, I'm wondering why Mesa 10.3-1 (so not the rc3 but the official 10.3 release) has not made it to F21. It fixes a bunch of crashes with Radeon r300 (and hence gnome-shell) for me. Thanks, Patrick -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: bugzilla usage trends

On 10/10/2014 06:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks here who either work on the infrastructure or ar

Engineering Representiatve for the new Fedora Council

Hey all Fedora distribution developers, engineers, builders, and infrastructure people! As I hope you've seen by now, we're creating a new Fedora Council as a top-level project leadership and governance body. (If you missed it, see inode0's general announcement to the community

Engineering Representiatve for the new Fedora Council

Hey all Fedora distribution developers, engineers, builders, and infrastructure people! As I hope you've seen by now, we're creating a new Fedora Council as a top-level project leadership and governance body. (If you missed it, see inode0's general announcement to the community

Re: rpm 4.12 and weak dependencies

- Original Message - > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014, at 11:09 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > > especially as we are taking the RPM-level control away from the users > > completely in cloud > > How is that? We ship filesystem images with many installed packages. Removing the packages from an exis

Anyone else seen systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 setting /dev perms to 0600?

Both /dev/fuse and /dev/net/tun were set to 0600 (they both should be 0666) at the exact moment that I updated to systemd-208-22.fc20.x86_64 this morning. Possible other files have been affected too, but those were the two that broke stuff. Anyone seen this? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualiza

Re: Action Required: Shipping larger application icons in Fedora 22

- Original Message - > In Fedora 21 we show any valid application in the software center with > an application icon of 32x32 or larger. Currently a 32x32 icon has to > be padded with 16 pixels of whitespace on all 4 edges, and *also* has > to be scaled x2 to match other UI elements on HiDPI

Re: Action Required: Shipping larger application icons in Fedora 22

On 29 September 2014 12:36, Richard Hughes wrote: > Updated packages should be built for F22 (rawhide) before the end of > October So far very few packages have been built for F22 that contain larger icons. I'm still all set to start mass-filing bugs at the end of October. Richard. -- devel mai

[Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 10 October 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Agenda: - Update buildrequires cleanup work (davids & nils!) - Update Alpha base image - Open Floor Thanks & regards, Phil -- Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470 Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111 Red Hat GmbH | Email: Phil Knirsch Wan

Re: Giving away all of my packages

Thanks Tuan. It is yours now. On 10 October 2014 03:51, Truong Anh. Tuan wrote: > > - Original Message - >> From: "Christof Damian" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> >> Cc: "Fedora PHP development team" >> Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 9:12:42 PM >> Subject: Re:

rawhide report: 20141010 changes

Compose started at Fri Oct 10 05:15:05 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [Agda] ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHSterminfo-0.3.2.5-ghc7.6.3.so ghc-Agda-2.3.2.2-5.fc22.i686 requires libHShaskeline-0.7.0.3-ghc7.6.3.so

F-21 Branched report: 20141010 changes

Compose started at Fri Oct 10 07:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for armhfp -- [PyQuante] PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) = 0:1.1.6-2.fc21 [audtty] audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli

Re: bugzilla usage trends

On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 05:39:34PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > I was curious about the rate of bug reporting in Fedora, and did > this quick experiment. I thought it might be interesting to folks > here who either work on the infrastructure or are curious about > long-term collaboration trend

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 03 October 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 06 Oct 2014 13:32:08 +0200 Václav Pavlín wrote: > Dennis, how can I help you to figure out image publishing process? > Let me know if I can be any help, we should definitely move forward > on this and it probably doesn't make sense vote until

Re: rpm 4.12 and weak dependencies

On 10/09/2014 05:29 PM, Jerry James wrote: Added most of your improvements to the page. Thanks! Florian PS: The rpm.org wiki is locked down because of spam. But people inerested in improving the contents and documentation can just create an account and ask for edit privileges on the ma