Adam Williamson composed on 2014-11-04 23:22 (UTC-0800):
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123170 , I never have time
> to investigate it properly and provide details - sorry about that. But I
> guess the same way of thinking would say the timer is a 'step in the
> right direction' fo
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 04:52 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> It's not about Lennart. Afaik he usually sticks to git HEAD and/or
> rawhide. There are multiple reports about systemd entering an infinite
> loop and I *thought* that this is a step in the right
> direction.
Well, looking at
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 04:52 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I'm very appreciative of the kernel promise of stability. But systemd
> isn't at this stage yet, the codebase is much more in flux.
Well, it's in flux, but it *is* the init system. It's kind of
important. :)
--
Adam Williams
llvm-3.5 seems to break Haskell programs compiled with ghc on ARM badly.
> Perhaps I should just barge ahead with a compat-llvm34?
Adam: this would be very welcome for ghc
(ghc only needs llvm - not any clang bits).
Otherwise currently we can't build any Haskell packages in Rawhide
because compi
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:09:35PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 01:06 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:06:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:39 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > >
> > > > I
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 01:06 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:06:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:39 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > I understand that systemd git is not easy to follow, but I don't think
> > >
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:35 PM, Saurabh Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> So I've been working on a project that requires me to have my own custom
> initrd. The doc I'm following is specialized for ubuntu, so it makes use of
> mkinitramfs to create initrd, and uses initramfs-tools/scripts and
> init
Hi there,
So I've been working on a project that requires me to have my own custom
initrd. The doc I'm following is specialized for ubuntu, so it makes use of
mkinitramfs to create initrd, and uses initramfs-tools/scripts and
initramfs-tools/hooks for serving its purpose. I tried using dracut to
c
== Meeting time change ==
Note, this week the meeting time is changed from 1700UTC to 1800UTC now
that both Europe and the US have changed DST.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-11-05
# Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 08:00 PST)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
The first TC of Final is upon us! Along with that, we've changed up the release
schedule a bit so we need to get to finding and knocking out these blocker
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 02:06:21PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:39 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > I understand that systemd git is not easy to follow, but I don't think
> > this differes that much from other fast-changing projects. If you take
> > a ran
On Tuesday, November 4, 2014, 6:01:35 PM, Robert Mayz wrote:
>2014-11-04 23:55 GMT+01:00 Al Dunsmuir :
>On Tuesday, November 4, 2014, 10:01:02 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> The Fedora 21 beta release is here, and - as usual - is packed
>> with amazing improvements to Fedora, as well as fantastic fre
2014-11-04 23:55 GMT+01:00 Al Dunsmuir :
> . On Tuesday, November 4, 2014, 10:01:02 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > The Fedora 21 beta release is here, and - as usual - is packed
> > with amazing improvements to Fedora, as well as fantastic free
> > and open source software, gently harvested for you
. On Tuesday, November 4, 2014, 10:01:02 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> The Fedora 21 beta release is here, and - as usual - is packed
> with amazing improvements to Fedora, as well as fantastic free
> and open source software, gently harvested for your enjoyment. No
> bits were harmed in the making o
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:39 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> I understand that systemd git is not easy to follow, but I don't think
> this differes that much from other fast-changing projects. If you take
> a random kernel release, it's not like there's a nice lwn-style description
> so
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:41 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:49:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:37 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:27:58PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > > Teste
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:49:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:37 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:27:58PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > > Testers, please take care to test the update thoroughly, despite the
> > > > > smal
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:48:36PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:20 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:56:40AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 17:37 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:37 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:27:58PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Testers, please take care to test the update thoroughly, despite the
> > > > small bump and small description it is a major change to the package.
> >
>
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:20 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:56:40AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 17:37 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > systemd "216-9" is not b
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 12:27:58PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Testers, please take care to test the update thoroughly, despite the
> > > small bump and small description it is a major change to the package.
>
> > That I can agree with. I'd much prefer a concrete list of things to
> > test
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 21:13 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > An update has been submitted for systemd today:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kmod-18-4.fc21,systemd-216-9.fc21
> >
> > with a fairly shor
On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 09:13:07AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-11-02 at 10:13 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 02, 2014 at 04:08:36PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > > Is there any authoritative group at Fedora who wants the product to not
> > > suck like that?
> >
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:56:40AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 17:37 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > systemd "216-9" is not built from 216 at all, it is in fact systemd-217
> >
> > Why the misleading
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> An update has been submitted for systemd today:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kmod-18-4.fc21,systemd-216-9.fc21
>
> with a fairly short description. I wanted to flag up that, in fact,
> systemd-216-9 is a major chang
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 04:56 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> This looks related to: https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
>
> (Note that the is equivalent to issues with rpm
> %check)
>
> It's implemented by gnome-continuous, and there's been a bit of effort to
> make -tests subpackag
== tl;dr Version ==
We are accelerating the Fedora 21 schedule so that we will enter Final
Freeze one week earlier than previously described on the schedule
page[1]. This means that all fixes intended for inclusion in the Fedora
21 release must be submitted for the stable repository no later than
On 2014-10-13 10:23 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> I've searched for bugs related to the specific problems I've been having, and
> I've not been able to find anything that describes what I'm seeing.
>
> I have an HP EliteBook 840 that also comes with an UltraDock, to which I've
> plugged
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32 -0800,
Adam Williamson wrote:
systemd-216-8 (and 216-1 through 216-5) and earlier) was more or less
identical to upstream systemd-stable 216:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/log/?h=v216-stable .
systemd "216-9" is not built from 216 at all, i
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 8:42 AM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Hello,
> - Original Message -
>> On Mon, 03.11.14 09:13, Miloslav Trmač (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > - Original Message -
>> > > On Fri, 31.10.14 10:04, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I fi
On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 17:37 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > systemd "216-9" is not built from 216 at all, it is in fact systemd-217
>
> Why the misleading version number?
There is a comment in the spec:
# This is really closer t
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing instructi
Hello,
- Original Message -
> On Mon, 03.11.14 09:13, Miloslav Trmač (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Fri, 31.10.14 10:04, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote:
> > >
> > > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467
> > >
Hi
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 11:37 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > systemd "216-9" is not built from 216 at all, it is in fact systemd-217
>
> Why the misleading version number?
>
More importantly, why is this pushed so late in the r
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 08:30:32AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> systemd "216-9" is not built from 216 at all, it is in fact systemd-217
Why the misleading version number?
--
Tomasz Torcz "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.plwagon filled
An update has been submitted for systemd today:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kmod-18-4.fc21,systemd-216-9.fc21
with a fairly short description. I wanted to flag up that, in fact,
systemd-216-9 is a major change from systemd-216-8 and is not really
systemd 216 at all.
systemd-216-8 (an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Fedora 21 beta release is here, and - as usual - is packed
with amazing improvements to Fedora, as well as fantastic free
and open source software, gently harvested for your enjoyment. No
bits were harmed in the making of this beta.
What is the Be
On Sun, 2 Nov 2014 10:13:10 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Is there any authoritative group at Fedora who wants the product to not
> > suck like that?
>
> Authoritative? Probably FESCo.
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1365
Basically, we need to tell every Fedora User that Firefox and Cl
On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 03:26:50AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > I talked to several people over the last couple days about what we can
> > do to try to avoid the "hero testing" treadmill that we've been on
> > during every Freeze in recent memory (specifically that we're usually
> > fixing Blocke
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 14:45:43 +0100
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane
> > wrote:
> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Please try again with "make"
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
>
> Hi,
>
> Please try again with "make" directly instead of "make %{?_smp_mflags}".
I tried but it stalled again:
http:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> the builders have 3.16.3-200.fc20.x86_64, could you retry the local
> mock rebuild with this kernel installed? I know it won't solve the
> problem, but might lead to having a reproducer. Eventually also with
> the same mock config as used for the
Compose started at Tue Nov 4 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[PyQuante]
PyQuante-libint-1.6.4-11.fc21.1.armv7hl requires libint(armv7hl-32) =
0:1.1.6-2.fc21
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudcli
On Mon, 03.11.14 09:13, Miloslav Trmač (m...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hello,
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, 31.10.14 10:04, Andrew Lutomirski (l...@mit.edu) wrote:
> >
> > > I filed an FPC ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/467
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > I very much agree wi
IMO It would be great if anyone can step in, rebuild the gtk3 package
for other Fedora's and maintain the copr repo. I can help with any
issues with that so feel free to ask.
ma.
On 11/04/2014 12:37 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If you'd li
The Gtk3 Firefox is enabled for master (Fedora 22) now. If you'd like to
have gtk3 build for other distros, just change the toolkit_gtk3 variable
and rebuild (locally, in copr).
I'd be glad for any feedback/bugreport and please mind - it's still
"rawhide" :)
ma.
On 01/13/2014 04:15 PM, Mart
Compose started at Tue Nov 4 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[alienarena]
a
This looks related to: https://wiki.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
(Note that the is equivalent to issues with rpm
%check)
It's implemented by gnome-continuous, and there's been a bit of effort to make
-tests subpackages for some pieces in Fedora, but AFAIK no runner yet.
The thing that
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:40:07 +0100
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> > hm, it's not the first case where Mono enters a deadlock or endless
> > loop ...
> >
> > What is your host system and what is the kernel version?
>
> $ cat /etc/redhat-release
> Fedo
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 9:02 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> hm, it's not the first case where Mono enters a deadlock or endless
> loop ...
>
> What is your host system and what is the kernel version?
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
$ uname -r
3.16.6-200.fc20.x86_64
Bye,
Andrea
--
Tim, thanks for your comments, I think we're on the same page in
basically all aspects you mention.
It seems like the issue was more wording and I still fail to find some
better term for the tests that I was referring to -- so, how to ideally
call the tests that are not unit tests any more, bu
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
Hi,
Please try again with "make" directly instead of "make %{?_smp_mflags}".
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 08:52:25 +0100
Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm trying to build pinta but it fails due to timeout on F20 and F22:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009403
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8009471
>
>
> It built fine for F19 and F2
53 matches
Mail list logo
