The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
33
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3621/php-Smarty-3.1.21-1.el7
17
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
16
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
952
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
407
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
171
Am 29.11.2014 um 19:11 schrieb Matthias Runge:
Interesting, although I believe, we had more than 35 contributors in
September or 39 in October.
For example, I made am listed with 78 commits all time[1]. I believe, based
on badges.fp.o[2], I have more than 400 SCM commits.
One thing to keep
Not all commits are authored by approved packagers (git am),
and some packagers have relinquished their membership in FAS (yes,
that happened)
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Compose started at Sun Nov 30 05:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[NetworkManager-openconnect]
NetworkManager-openconnect-0.9.8.4-4.fc22.i686 requires
Compose started at Sun Nov 30 07:15:02 UTC 2014
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc21.noarch requires hadoop-client
[openstack-nova]
On 30.11.2014 03:40, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Yes! I have the exact same problem or a very similar one. My local
repo is already maintained by 'root' It's on '/opt/LocalYumRepo' and
when the magic happens, it gets copied to '/opt/LocalYumRepo.tmp'.
but the RPMs in *both* directories are
On 30 November 2014 at 00:20, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Today it happened a handful of times that my local rpm repository got wiped
out (except for the repodata folder), and owner/group changed to root/root
(including the repodata folder).
That sounds like a libhif bug. What are
On 30.11.2014 14:24, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 30 November 2014 at 00:20, Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com wrote:
Today it happened a handful of times that my local rpm repository got wiped
out (except for the repodata folder), and owner/group changed to root/root
(including the repodata
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 07:39:47AM +0100, Jakub Filak wrote:
The discussion I mentioned above was primarily about OpenStack (but the
participants also expressed concerns about sending 'environ' to Bugzilla
at all), where people are regularly storing their passwords and tokens
as environment
Hi all,
I was testing installing Fedora 21 Final RC1 in the free space on a GPT
drive with Windows 8.1 (Lenovo Z40). I'm installing from a USB stick made
from the ISO.
Every time I click Begin Installation in Anaconda, it locks up at the
screen where I'm supposed to be able to enter the root
Unless there is a bug in anaconda, that smells a lot like UEFI.
Did you boot in BIOS/Legacy mode or UEFI when windows 8 were installed?
What were your BIOS settings with regard to that and SecureBoot?
There are some issues with recent Lenovo laptops, UEFI and linux.
2014-11-30 19:09 GMT+02:00
I doubt it's a UEFI or SecureBoot problem... the Fedora Live USB I made
boots just fine. The UEFI setting is EFI-only (no legacy boot). I also
tried with and without SecureBoot, and had the same behavior.
(Interestingly, even with SecureBoot turned on, I did not have any issues
installing and
On Sun, 30 Nov 2014 13:14:26 -0500
Christopher ctubbsii-fed...@apache.org wrote:
I doubt it's a UEFI or SecureBoot problem... the Fedora Live USB I
made boots just fine. The UEFI setting is EFI-only (no legacy boot).
I also tried with and without SecureBoot, and had the same behavior.
So, I'm willing to bet it's more of an Anaconda problem. I'm just not sure how
to even begin tracking it down. ...
File a bugzilla report, and attach each file in /var/log/anaconda
as a separate text/plain attachment. The storage.log contains
the analysis of how the disks look.
--
devel
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 01:43:39PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
How about having abrt just remove or scrub all variables that start
with /^OS_/ ? I know it's nasty to have application-specific
treatment of environment variables like this, but the number of
applications that pass auth
On 30 November 2014 at 05:12, Haïkel wrote:
Not all commits are authored by approved packagers (git am),
and some packagers have relinquished their membership in FAS (yes,
that happened)
But more importantly, not all packagers are developers. Hard to figure
out which packagers actually do
On Tue, 25.11.14 12:17, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
I've got a TV schedule grabber script that needs to be run on a more or
less daily basis. That would be good enough, but the script suggests a next
start time in it's output when it completes.
If I can figure out a way to
Hi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
There's also OpenNebula (^ONE_) and Vmware (^VI_) doing the same. Seems
to be pretty common with virt and cloud stuff. Apart from that I can't
think of anything else right now.
Rackspace, DigitalOcean, Google Computing Engine etc
I don't think there's much to discuss at present besides Fedora 21
testing, so I think we may as well just go right ahead and run a blocker
review meeting instead of the QA meeting. I'll send out an announce for
that right after this mail - usual time, but in #fedora-blocker-review,
and we'll
# F21 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2014-12-01
# Time: 16:00 UTC (run date -d '2014-11-19 16:00 UTC' to see local time)
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Instead of the QA meeting this week, let's run a blocker review meeting.
Currently we have 5 proposed blockers and 6
perl-Git-Repository has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Git-Repository-1.312-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_version='5.20.1';)
On i386:
perl-Git-Repository-1.312-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_version='5.20.1';)
On armhfp:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-LibYAML:
528f43de6174fecb471b69293c5eb8c3 YAML-LibYAML-0.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b6c7bcd3567bd2009685b91ae20ab6f081353a5c
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Nov 30 18:09:28 2014 +
Update to 0.54
- New upstream release 0.54
- Fix for an edge case in scanner that results in an assert() failing
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.54-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
b6c7bcd... Update to 0.54
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora QA Devel Meeting on 2014-12-01 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00
America/New_York
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Biweekly meeting to go over QA development related topics (Taskotron,
BlockerBugs, and other
26 matches
Mail list logo
