The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Andre Robatino
robat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.brain at gmail.com writes:
you forget about DLNA sharing, and some more GNOME services.
I googled for DLNA sharing to find out which ports it uses, and it seems
that all of those ports are closed. Are there any specific ports you would
expect to be open?
BTW, I just
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:41:52 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Hi,
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was
not amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
port protocol=udp
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
using. (BTW, Transmission now seems to automatically open an incoming port -
in F20 and below I had to tell Transmission to use a fixed port instead of a
random one, and manually open that port in the firewall.)
Forgot to mention that
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:47147 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 15610/rygel
tcp0 0 192.168.122.1:59505 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 15610/rygel
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:51413 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 13331/transmission-
tcp0 0 192.168.122.1:530.0.0.0:*
On 8 December 2014 at 08:38, Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org wrote:
On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 07:41:52 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Hi,
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was
not amused when I noticed this:
Am 08.12.2014 um 07:41 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
port protocol=udp port=1025-65535/
port protocol=tcp
Am 08.12.2014 um 09:38 schrieb Paul Howarth:
FWIW, this is mentioned in the release notes:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Release_Notes/sect-Products.html#Products-Workstation
2.3.3. Developer oriented firewall
Developers often run test servers that run on high numbered
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
On 08.12.2014 10:29, Reindl Harald wrote:
- Original Message -
Hi,
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
port protocol=udp port=1025-65535/
port protocol=tcp port=1025-65535/
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
No it
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:34 schrieb Michael Spahn:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
* you know that
* i know that
* the same
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 09:38 schrieb Paul Howarth:
FWIW, this is mentioned in the release notes:
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/21/html/Release_Notes/sect-Products.html#Products-Workstation
2.3.3. Developer oriented firewall
Developers often
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:48 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
port protocol=udp port=1025-65535/
port protocol=tcp
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
No it wouldn't be, because users don't
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
WTF - developer oriented firewall on workstation?
i doubt it is smart that by default my running Eclipse
accepts incoming connections from the WAN (that i am
paied for IT security prevents that but only here)
tcp0 0 0.0.0.0:20080
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
WTF - developer oriented firewall on workstation?
i doubt it is smart that by default my running Eclipse
accepts incoming connections from the WAN (that i am
paied for IT security prevents that but only
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a workstation.
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:26 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:51 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
WTF - developer oriented firewall on workstation?
i doubt it is smart that by default my running Eclipse
accepts incoming connections from the WAN (that i am
paied for IT security prevents that but
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:03:20PM +0100, Juan Orti wrote:
Hi, I know how to manually configure the zram, but what's the best way
to do it?
I've seen the unit zram.service of anaconda-core, and it gets activated
when booting with inst.zram=on, but it looks like very anaconda-centric.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my computer and in this case my operating system.
It's
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:32 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 10:50 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a appropriate solution for a
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my computer and
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my computer and in this case my operating system.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 11:36:47 +0100
Karel Zak k...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 09:03:20PM +0100, Juan Orti wrote:
Hi, I know how to manually configure the zram, but what's the best
way to do it?
I've seen the unit zram.service of anaconda-core, and it gets
activated when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
On 08.12.2014 11:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm
thinking
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my computer
It's not good UI for any OS, not just the ones based on GNOME.
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
On 08.12.2014 11:48, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my
- Original Message -
From: Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:22:04 PM
Subject: Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall
- Original Message -
On 08/12/14 12:10, Michael Spahn wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Probably this is not gnomish enough to him.
Hm... There's something strange familiar with this discussion... yes, in
[1] there are several threads on Firewall blocking desktop features.
I can see both
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
From: Bastien Nocera bnoc...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:22:04 PM
Subject: Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall
Compose started at Mon Dec 8 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[cab]
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:34 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to me, to customize
and take advantage of my
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:34 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the freedom to make decisions. This means to
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
Subject: Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:02 schrieb Aleksandar Kurtakov:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
Subject: Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:22
On 8 December 2014 at 12:02, Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, December 8, 2014 1:26:29 PM
Subject: Re: Workstation Product defaults to wide-open firewall
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
3 packages were orphaned
clucene09 [master] was orphaned by robert
A C++ port of Lucene
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/clucene09
libvmime [master]
- Original Message -
snip
Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
for user applications, not root ones.
--
devel mailing list
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
for user applications, not root ones
and that
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
for user
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:56 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 13:39 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, it's in your hands now, and every application developer's hands,
if RH is going to be turning the default firewall off.
Not Red Hat, Fedora. And it's not off by default either. It's disabled
On 12/05/2014 05:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Starting the non-reponsive maintainter process for vda - Denys Vlasenko -
dvlas...@redhat.com as he appears to have completely abandoned busybox.
Anyone know him or how to contact?
Hi. I'm here.
How can I help you?
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 07:56:28AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Rootkit won't require opened *server* ports. It will contact a command
server through a client port, which requires no special privileges. If
you blocked the firewall for user applications, you just made the
system a pain to
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:11:40PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
You're free to select another firewall zone
And free to move to another distro of course.
Well, or free to select another Fedora offering, or configure you
systems to not be Fedora Workstation.
The defaults are different in the
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:40:30AM +0100, Michael Spahn wrote:
I hope it's not needed to mentions that we are not Ubuntu, Windows or
OSx. We are a free and open Linux distribution and every step in
another direction is an attack against the ideas of free open source
and open mind.
Let's
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:14:36AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
I can help as several months ago the budgie music player was packaged by
myself. At that time the desktop was however unstable.
Thanks. The packaging is straightforward, for the most part. The
only sticky issue is the inclusion of
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 12:34 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Well, I'll understand these aspects.
But when I think about Linux, especially about Fedora, I'm thinking
about the
On 12/08/2014 10:50 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We don't need open or preconfigured high ports.
What we really need is a user notification with options to allow or
deny like we do with SELinux.
That would be a
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Amazon-S3:
652bfee36dbb2c21e8e5633961db7780 Net-Amazon-S3-0.60.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
It won't be a library in the short-term either.
- Original Message -
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 08:14:36AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
I can help as several months ago the budgie music player was packaged by
myself. At that time the
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it was a
Workstation team decision.
What?! We discussed it, and it was deemed acceptable
On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it was a
Workstation team decision.
On 8 December 2014 at 13:45, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 12:11:40PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
You're free to select another firewall zone
And free to move to another distro of course.
Well, or free to select another Fedora offering, or configure you
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it
On Thu, 2014-12-04 at 20:01 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.12.2014 um 19:57 schrieb Adam Jackson:
I think it's a bit misguided to even think of these things as related.
Polish in an end-user-visible sense is itself a list of tasks and
criteria that require dedicated attention, preferably
commit 4c2b55a59d34410fa3e528d1b8bd8da5be16
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Dec 8 15:41:35 2014 +0100
0.05-TRIAL
.gitignore |1 +
perl-smartmatch.spec | 17 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 7
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled
as a library?
Zbyszek
It won't be a library in the short-term either.
--
devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-MaybeXS:
2780e19be87f56078f990a16361ed51b JSON-MaybeXS-1.003003.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/08/2014 03:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use
Am 08.12.2014 um 15:45 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
This is wrong and you know about that - the firewalld folks have been
urged to use this zone for the Workstation product - it was a
Workstation team decision.
What?! We discussed it, and it
Hi,
A perhaps naive question, but is it really necessary to have both the
audio and jackuser groups? Could these not be consolidated moving
forward?
Cheers,
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 03:45 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 03:12 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On 12/08/2014 12:51 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
snip
This is wrong and you know about that - the
You're completely right, I won't follow security experts' ideas on UI, just as
I won't follow a UX designers' ideas on security.
I was happy to act as the go between to fix a long-standing problem, only to be
told 6 month later that they accepted the
change because we gave them a choice that
Bastien Nocera wrote:
This was discussed, and implemented in the open, and I sent the details of
the feature, and how it would be implemented to the fedora desktop list,
as is customary for Workstation features.
That's the problem, you discuss everything in your private playground where
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:31:58PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
There are three products: workstation, server, cloud. Workstation is
the one for desktop use. That leaves server to aim for the traditional
fedora user base, since cloud is (understandably) a very different
thing. So if you want a
if your discussions leaded to the decisions also used the quoting style
like in that thread only contain myself said i guess what went wrong
in the first place
i am still unsure if that's
* intentional to mask communication
* just a bad usage of your mail-client
in any case it's not the
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Yeah, that's so useful. Oh, you clicked it, it's your fault. That's not
the type of OS I want to help implement, sorry.
So you rather implement the type of OS that just always assumes Yes
without even asking? Because that's what the current firewall rules do
(between
On 12/08/2014 06:20 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 12/05/2014 05:43 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Starting the non-reponsive maintainter process for vda - Denys Vlasenko -
dvlas...@redhat.com as he appears to have completely abandoned busybox.
Anyone know him or how to contact?
Hi. I'm here.
- Original Message -
if your discussions leaded to the decisions also used the quoting style
like in that thread only contain myself said i guess what went wrong
in the first place
i am still unsure if that's
* intentional to mask communication
* just a bad usage of your
- Original Message -
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 02:31:58PM +, Ian Malone wrote:
There are three products: workstation, server, cloud. Workstation is
the one for desktop use. That leaves server to aim for the traditional
fedora user base, since cloud is (understandably) a very
Bastien Nocera wrote:
You're free to select another firewall zone.
How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
- Original Message -
Bastien Nocera wrote:
You're free to select another firewall zone.
How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default?
Settings - Network, select your network - Identity - Firewall zone
--
devel mailing list
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them, and also for all those people out there (like me) who
were NOT disabling
Am 08.12.2014 um 16:49 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Make sure to note that I'm convinced that the new firewall settings in
Fedora Workstation 21 are more secure than what was available in Fedora 20's
default settings.
If Reindl, Kevin or Tomas want to disagree with that, I'll give you a little
- Original Message -
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled
as a library?
It could be, as long as it's not installed in a system-wide location.
My
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 11:01:50AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:08:09AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
It's a sub-module because it's not a library.
I know it does not have a stable api. But could it be compiled
as a library?
Am 08.12.2014 um 16:55 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
You're free to select another firewall zone.
How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by default?
Settings - Network, select your network - Identity - Firewall zone
that's possible with one click?
fine, then the only
- Original Message -
Bastien Nocera wrote:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them,
It's not disabled.
and also for all
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:08 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.12.2014 um 16:55 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
You're free to select another firewall zone.
How, when you don't even install the firewall configuration tool by
default?
Settings - Network, select your network - Identity -
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them,
It's not disabled
it is practically
the
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the reasons
why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening
by default, which was due to a bug in packaging. So what you call no firewall
would actually have
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall
settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them,
- Original Message -
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the
reasons
why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening
by default, which was due to a bug in packaging. So what
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:17 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Security is about compromises. The net result of the old firewall
settings
was people disabling the firewall.
And the net result of the new firewall settings is you disabling the
firewall for them,
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:20 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
Am 08.12.2014 um 17:10 schrieb Bastien Nocera:
There's a few more items that will be opened I'm afraid. And one of the
reasons
why we block root ports is to avoid regressions like rpcbind listening
by default, which was due to a bug in packaging.
Hi all!
Fedora 21 is almost out of the doors (tomorrow!) and it's time to
take a look closer on Fedora 22 plans. But before we move on, I'd
like to ask you to help us with Fedora 21 retrospective [1]. We'd
really like to know what you think went well and what did not.
Fedora 22 starts with
Hi,
my friend reported to me that mate-calc is deprected. We should use
galculator instead.
I've checked and found blogpost from one of mate release[0]. Please
fix up comps.xml.
Couldn't find bugzilla component for this.
[0]http://mate-desktop.org/blog/2014-03-17-galculator-is-coming-to-mate/
On Mon, Dec 08, 2014 at 09:10:59AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
On Dec 8, 2014 8:51 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 04:45:12PM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
python-dateutil is old[0]. Fedora is carrying version 1.5, and upstream
is up to 2.3 .
On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 17:47 +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
fedocal and python-django-tastypie are the only packages which
explicitly require python-dateutil 2. If you wish, I can volunteer
file bugs to change the dependency for F21 and rawhide for those two
packages and do it
I spoke with the MATE team a few weeks ago and they said that for the time
being mate-calc will remain the default.
Galculator *might* make it to the 1.10 release.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Next time, don't be 6 month late if you're going to be flippant.
I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
are behind an enterprise firewall anyway.
--
devel mailing list
Am 08.12.2014 um 18:33 schrieb DJ Delorie:
Next time, don't be 6 month late if you're going to be flippant.
I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
are behind an enterprise firewall anyway
I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
are behind an enterprise firewall anyway
that don't apply for a notebook, especially not if the enduser is=20
connected to a public WLAN and if you
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 11:03 PM, DJ Delorie d...@redhat.com wrote:
I, for one, am happy to welcome our new more-reasonable-less-paranoid
overlords. I've been disabling my firewall for ages, as my machines
are behind an enterprise firewall anyway.
So the target audience has shifted from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014 02:29:17 +
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 11:02:28AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
For us, that would mean
So the target audience has shifted from developers to developers who
don't understand ports, don't like user prompts and are behind
enterprise firewalls.
Certainly not. I've never assumed I was an average user. There are
many different reasons why people might want a more open firewall
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
