On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 2:10 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik posted (and
>> Change owner(s): Hans de Goede
> wrote):
>
>> KDE: limits itself to standard X11 mouse config interfaces, no changes
>> needed.
>
> Not true. We ship kcm_touchpad on the KDE spin, which definitely does depend
>
On 13 December 2014 at 01:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> An additional objection I have to this change proposal is that libinput
> (deliberately) only implements a small subset of the configurability of the
> old drivers, and thus, if we are going to remove the old drivers entirely,
> we are taking awa
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2014-12-15
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! Let's follow up on the action items
from last week, and also pick
Jaroslav Reznik posted (and
> Change owner(s): Hans de Goede
wrote):
> KDE: limits itself to standard X11 mouse config interfaces, no changes
> needed.
Not true. We ship kcm_touchpad on the KDE spin, which definitely does depend
on synaptics interfaces (search for "synaptics" in:
https://project
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 04:53:01PM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Mr. Hughes, I have a complaint.
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only
> > one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> So it won't be changed upstream, or downstream.
It MUST be changed downstream according to our policies. If you refuse to do
it, then you should get removed from that package's Fedora maintainership.
Sometimes, it's better to have a packager who's not also an upstream
de
Michael DePaulo wrote:
> I too come from an Ubuntu/Debian background. Like other major pieces
> of software, Ubuntu and Debian both make multiple 2.x or 3.x versions
> of LLVM available for each release of their OS. They do the
> following:
> 1. The major version is specified in the package name.
Mr. Hughes, I have a complaint.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only
> one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use
> 624x351, or integer multiples thereof. You can still ship random siz
Recently, I've ended up interacting with Fedora packages that use several
different "higher order" or "layered" tools on top of fedpkg.
I created this page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Layered_build_scripts_for_package_maintainers
which attempts to enumerate the ones I know of. It's certain
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:01 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
>> > I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
>> > everything built by this Friday and the update available
tl;dr: AppStream builder will reject AppData screenshots smaller than 312x175.
If you want things to be pixel-crisp and your application ships only
one screenshot use 752x423. If you've got multiple screenshots use
624x351, or integer multiples thereof. You can still ship random sized
screenshots
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:14:50AM -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
> Working here on F21 - karma logged!
Thanks. Btw, could you also check if things work fine after restarting
docker.service (if not tested already)? I see database locked errors after a
restart on rawhide :\
>
> On Fri, Dec
Dave Johansen wrote:
> I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before
> opening the Bugzilla I wanted to check if there was any feedback on here.
> I have spec files and source RPMs available at:
> https://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/qwt-qt5/qwt-qt5.spec
> https://daveisfera.f
On 12/12/2014 07:04 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> I'm guessing the FPC hasn't found out about the libgd git-submodule yet...
>
Apparently not as I don't see any FPC tickets for it nor listed here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries#Packages_granted_exceptions
gnome-musi
Working here on F21 - karma logged!
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar
wrote:
> I've updated docker to 1.4.0 for fedora and fedora epel. This release fixes:
> CVE-2014-9357: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9357
> CVE-2014-9358: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve
Good Day!
On 12/12/2014 9:05 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
>
It does currently work and has been supported prior to the current
release. You can test using a site like palava.tv
Here are webrtc and Mozilla resourc
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:38:52AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On 12/12/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> > >> Agreed, a static l
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires
java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64
OpenJDK 7 has been dropped from F21. You would get prompt answer from fedora-
java mailing list.
$ rpm -qa | grep icedtea
icedtea-web-1.5.1-1.fc21.x86_64
$ rp
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report
wrote:
> stunnel-5.08-1.fc22
> ---
> * Thu Dec 11 2014 Avesh Agarwal - 5.08-1
> - 1163349: New upstream release 5.08
This is a downgrade:
$ rpmdev-vercmp 5.08b6-1.fc22 5.08-1.fc22
5.08b6-1.fc22 > 5.08-1.fc22
People running
On Wednesday, December 10, 2014 04:36:09 PM Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> icedtea-web-1.5.2-0.fc20.x86_64 requires
> java-1.7.0-openjdk-1:1.7.0.71-2.5.3.0.fc20.x86_64
OpenJDK 7 has been dropped from F21. You would get prompt answer from fedora-
java mailing list.
$ rpm -qa | grep icedtea
icedtea-we
On Friday, December 12, 2014 03:05:42 PM Joachim Backes wrote:
> anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
I am under the impression WebRTC already works on Firefox.
--
Regards,
Sudhir Khanger,
sudhirkhanger.com,
github.com/donniezazen,
5577 8CDB A059 085D 1D60 807
I've updated docker to 1.4.0 for fedora and fedora epel. This release fixes:
CVE-2014-9357: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9357
CVE-2014-9358: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9358
CVE-2014-9356: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2014-9356
It'd be great if
= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 4.2 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_4.2
Change owner(s): Josef Stříbný , Vít Ondruch
, ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ruby on Rails 4.2 is the latest version of well know web framework written in
Ruby.
Note: This change mig
On Fri, 2014-12-12 at 13:01 +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
> > I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
> > everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
> > by Monday. Test feedback would be particul
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
>> I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
>> everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
>> by Monday. Test feedback would be particularly a
= Proposed System Wide Change: UEFI Secure Boot Blacklist Updates =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UEFISecureBootBlacklistUpdates
Change owner(s): Peter Jones
Currently our implementation of UEFI Secure Boot does not include a facility
to apply blacklist ("dbx") updates enabled by defau
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
>> I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
>> everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
>> by Monday. Test feedback would be particularly a
- Original Message -
> On 12/12/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> >> Agreed, a static library is a waste of time. What about a normal
> >> shared library? Do you think pat
On 12/12/2014 03:18 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
- Original Message -
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Agreed, a static library is a waste of time. What about a normal
shared library? Do you think patches to do that would be accepted?
How does a shared
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > >>> Meeting summary
> > > >>> ---
> > > >>> * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
> > > >>>
> > > >>> * #476 Requesting copylib exempti
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 09:04:19AM -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > >>> Meeting summary
> > >>> ---
> > >>> * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
> > >>>
> > >>> * #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
> > >>> (gep
Hi all,
anybody knows if the webrtc support in firefox will be released in F21?
Kind regards
Joachim Backes
--
Fedora release 21 (Twenty One)
Kernel-3.17.6-300.fc21.x86_64
Joachim Backes
https://www-user.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://ad
- Original Message -
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >>> Meeting summary
> >>> ---
> >>> * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
> >>>
> >>> * #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
> >>> (geppetto, 17:06:19)
> >>> * ACT
user: limb set for ddick acl: watchcommits of package: perl-CPAN-Reporter from:
to: Approved on branch: epel7
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-CPAN-Reporter
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-de
On 12/12/2014 06:26 AM, Jason Taylor wrote:
In effort to resolve a security related BZ[0] I have attempted to contact the
active package maintainer(s) (rwmjones was listed but is not an active member of
the SIG) as well as the mailing list[1] with no response. We discussed this BZ
as well as some
Hi everyone,
let me again share with you crash statistics for Fedora 20 and 21, that were
collected using ABRT.
First the big number: 4,838,888 total crashes in Fedora 20 and 21 in the last
30 days. That's over 161k every day and by far the record amount. About 95% of
them are kerneloopses, howe
Am Fri, 12 Dec 2014 12:00:07 +
schrieb devel-announce-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 14:42:11 +0100
> From: Jaroslav Reznik
> To: devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use
> libinput
>
Hi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:49 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
>
> Is there an upvote mechanism for that? I'd like to join the chorus if I
> can. ;-)
>
No. Voting is limited to FESCo members. However, if you feel you have
something more to add than the in-numerous responses already in this
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:04:36AM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some packages needing review. All pretty simple cmake/qmake stuff:
>
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173373 - qtspell -
> Spell checking for Qt text widgets [*]
> - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
Due to several members who can't make it to todays meeting we're
officially canceling the Base WG meeting today.
Next Friday will be the last meeting for this year too.
Thanks everyone!
Regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax
Hi All,
In effort to resolve a security related BZ[0] I have attempted to contact
the active package maintainer(s) (rwmjones was listed but is not an active
member of the SIG) as well as the mailing list[1] with no response. We
discussed this BZ as well as some other MinGW related security BZ's du
On 12/12/2014 10:01 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2014-12-12, Petr Hracek wrote:
On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Will this handle packages that have been dropped but not obsoleted in
the next release?
Yes definitely. The tool or respectively contents (which are part of
this tool) ca
W dniu 11.12.2014 o 18:16, Adam Jackson pisze:
> I've started staging an LLVM 3.5 rebase in F21. I hope to have
> everything built by this Friday and the update available in testing
> by Monday. Test feedback would be particularly appreciated on
> secondary arches and radeonsi 3D hardware.
Ca
W dniu 12.12.2014 o 08:32, Satyajit Sahoo pisze:
> Okay, forget Macbook Air. I don't have ethernet at my office, and it's the
> only place where I have internet. What can I do then?
You can boot one machine to any other OS, grab ISO from Fedora website
and put it on DVD or USB stick (there are in
Compose started at Fri Dec 12 05:15:03 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[bibletime]
bi
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:37:52PM -0700, john.tiger wrote:
> 7) Give option to save successful install in a simple install
> config file for multiple similar machines
FWIW, tbis is actually done every time, automatically -- you'll find a
kickstart file in ~root on the installed system.
> 8) te
On 12/12/2014 08:32 AM, Satyajit Sahoo wrote:
> Wireless might not be a strict requirement, but still essential.
I have some machines which does not have internet at all.
So for some user it is not essential at all.
It is hard to please everybody :)
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS
Red Hat, Senio
Hi Bastien,
On 12/12/2014 04:25 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>> Meeting summary
>>> ---
>>> * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:37)
>>>
>>> * #476 Requesting copylib exemption for libgnome-volume-control
>>> (geppetto, 17:06:19)
>>> * ACTION: General agreement that it should be made at le
- Original Message -
> Dear developers,
>
> On 12/12/2014 01:27 AM, James Antill wrote:
> > ==
> > #fedora-meeting-1: fpc
> > ==
> >
> >
> > Meeting started by geppetto at 17:01:37 UTC. The full logs are available
> > at
> > http://meetbot.fedora
On 12/11/2014 05:39 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:15:25PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> > I quite often start new instances from images in Cloud (either
>> > OpenStack or EC2) and do "yum upgrade". But because root partition is
>> > very limited (e.g. 3GB) and "yum upgrad
On 2014-12-12, Petr Hracek wrote:
> On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> Will this handle packages that have been dropped but not obsoleted in
>> the next release?
> Yes definitely. The tool or respectively contents (which are part of
> this tool) can be used for informing user
> th
On 12/11/2014 05:17 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 15:06:25 +0100,
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed Self Contained: Preupgrade Assistant =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preupgrade_Assistant
Change owner(s): Petr Hracek
The Preugrade Assistant is a tool to help
52 matches
Mail list logo
