Re: Mail bounces: akozu...@redhat.com

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:26:07AM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: > Generally I have seen sometimes when a RH employee quits, his packages > gets re-assigned to some peer or its manager. This can be easily seen > by bugzilla notifications where bugs gets reassigned. When Ales quit, > I thought this bu

rawhide report: 20141220 changes

Compose started at Sat Dec 20 05:15:02 UTC 2014 Broken deps for i386 -- [3Depict] 3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0 [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aes

chromium

I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party available for F21 is not acceptable - ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet thunderbird, dnf, etc is ... - I'm seeing a kernel problem warning WARNING: CPU 0 PID 1419 at drivers.net.wireless/ath/at

Cinnamon Spin

Hello, I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this is something people would like to see become official. It's not ready for submission quite yet, there is a bit of a hack to change the default gtk-theme to Zukitwo, as the Adwaita gtk-theme messes up title-bar and desk

Re: chromium

The fact that there isn't a popular 3rd-party repo packaging Chromium does not appear to be relevant to Fedora. I don't see anybody discouraging it. Perhaps you should approach a popular 3rd-party to suggestion packaging Chromium in their repos? http://rpmfusion.org/ is one such standard 3rd-party

Re: chromium

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/20/2014 05:33 PM, john.tiger wrote: > I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd > party available for F21 is not acceptable - > > ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet > thunderbird, dnf, etc is .

Re: chromium

Am 20.12.2014 um 17:33 schrieb john.tiger: I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party available for F21 is not acceptable for whom? ie. this morning Firefox is not connecting to the internet (yet thunderbird, dnf, etc is ... - I'm seeing a kernel problem warning W

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

Il 17/12/2014 20:38, Matthew Miller ha scritto: This is clearly, not the most friendly approach; it’s my understanding that the desktop designers, network tools team, and security team are going to work together to develop a better overall solution for Fedora 22 and beyond. Maybe I put it too s

Re: Cinnamon Spin

Hi On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dan Book wrote: > Hello, > I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this > is something people would like to see become official. It's not ready for > submission quite yet, there is a bit of a hack to change the default > gtk-theme

Re: Cinnamon Spin

Hi, I'm Fale, one of the cinnamon maintainer of Fedora and I was working on a Cinnamon Spin too. Due to the big amount of work I'm doing during these months, I kind of left it behind. I can join you with this project if you want too :). Thanks a lot, Fabio On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Rahul

Wiki upload rights

Hi, wiki admins please enable upload rights for "valentt" account so that I can continue contributing to wiki. Thanks, Valent. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduc

Re: chromium

On 20/12/14 17:40, Christopher wrote: The fact that there isn't a popular 3rd-party repo packaging Chromium does not appear to be relevant to Fedora. I don't see anybody discouraging it. Perhaps you should approach a popular 3rd-party to suggestion packaging Chromium in their repos? I made

Re: Cinnamon Spin

On 12/20/2014 8:35 AM, Dan Book wrote: Hello, I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this is something people would like to see become official. It's not ready for submission quite yet, there is a bit of a hack to change the default gtk-theme to Zukitwo, as the A

taskotron failure to see dependencies (...has inferior architecture )

... Automatic push to stable based on karma has been disabled for this update due to failure of an AutoQA test ... But I cannot see the error: ---8<--- not ok - depcheck for Bodhi update sagemath-6.1.1-6.fc20 # FAIL --- arch: x86_64 details: output: |- Build sagemath-6.1.1-6.fc20

Re: chromium

On 20 December 2014 at 09:33, john.tiger wrote: > I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party > available for F21 is not acceptable - > > Hi, I realize you are angry and upset you can't browse but various other functions are working, but your first sentence doesn't hel

Re: chromium

Hi, if you want take a tour with https://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/spot/chromium/fedora-chromium-stable.repo only for x86-64 arch for f20 ... regards gil Il 20/12/2014 20:18, Stephen John Smoogen ha scritto: On 20 December 2014 at 09:33, john.tiger > wro

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 17:51 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: > Maybe I put it too simple, but instead of opening all high ports by > default what about having firewall rules declared in RPMs for > packages > that need to have ports opened? Because we need to support applications that use random ports.

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

Am 20.12.2014 um 22:19 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 17:51 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: Maybe I put it too simple, but instead of opening all high ports by default what about having firewall rules declared in RPMs for packages that need to have ports opened? Because we need t

Re: chromium

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 09:33:45AM -0700, john.tiger wrote: > I understand Fedora's position on Chromium BUT not having a 3rd party > available for F21 is not acceptable - > <...> Chromium is already packaged by a Russian Fedora, check [1] to enable the repos (hint: use google translate or someth

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 22:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > you completly ignored the following paragraph, my guess is because > "ask > the user" is considered harmful by GNOME upstream Well I read it, but yes, I do think that ask the user is harmful. We need to get out of the business of training

Re: 5tFTW: Fedora 21, 22, and 19, firewall discussion, and holiday break

Am 20.12.2014 um 23:32 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 22:24 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: you completly ignored the following paragraph, my guess is because "ask the user" is considered harmful by GNOME upstream Well I read it, but yes, I do think that ask the user is harmful.

Re: taskotron failure to see dependencies (...has inferior architecture )

Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote: > Automatic push to stable based on karma has been > disabled for this update due to failure of an AutoQA > test > ... > > But I cannot see the error: This is a false positive. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https:

Re: chromium

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 8:33 AM, john.tiger wrote: > Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers. If you're concerned about keeping your applications working with Chrome your best bet would be to install google-chrome-unstable to stay on the forefront of compatibility. You can easily

Re: Cinnamon Spin

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati < fabioloc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm Fale, one of the cinnamon maintainer of Fedora and I was working on a > Cinnamon Spin too. Due to the big amount of work I'm doing during these > months, I kind of left it behind. I can join you

Re: chromium

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 8:33 AM, john.tiger > wrote: >> >> Also as developers, we need to work with all browsers. You need to work with all *popular* browsers. That's IE, Chrome stable, Firefox stable and iOS Safari, perhaps Opera. Look at

Re: Cinnamon Spin

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Thomas Gilliard wrote: > > On 12/20/2014 8:35 AM, Dan Book wrote: > > Hello, > I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this > is something people would like to see become official. It's not ready for > submission quite yet, there is a