The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
975
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
429
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
194
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
55
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3621/php-Smarty-3.1.21-1.el7
40
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
12
Hi,
I would like to take over this orphaned package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/orphaned/
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ddclient/
According to this webpage I should notify this email list:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
I
Compose started at Tue Dec 23 05:15:07 UTC 2014
Broken deps for i386
--
[3Depict]
3Depict-0.0.16-3.fc22.i686 requires libmgl.so.7.2.0
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
Hi,
sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375
Thanks!
Sandro
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
El 2014-12-23 15:41, Sandro Mani escribió:
Hi,
sqlitebrowser still looking for a reviewer :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173375
Thanks!
Sandro
Taken.
--
Juan Orti
https://miceliux.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 05:20:01PM +, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 22/12/14 17:07, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2014 05:59:50 +0100, Felix Miata wrote:
I started a yum upgrade process. When it reached 342/784 (@avahi) over half
an hour ago, the screen writing from the process simply
Hi,
RichiH, author of vcsh (one of my packages) and Debian contributor
asked my whether we could upstream Fedora packaging (more precisely
any packaging metadata). I simply showed him where the package's git
repo and we agreed I would notify him when I commit stuff. Btw, is there
a simple way to
Dave Johansen wrote:
I would like to create Qwt and QwtPolar packages for Qt5 and before
opening the Bugzilla I wanted to check if there was any feedback on here.
I have spec files and source RPMs available at:
https://daveisfera.fedorapeople.org/qwt-qt5/qwt-qt5.spec
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:05:24 +0100
valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
wiki admins please enable upload rights for valentt account so that
I can continue contributing to wiki.
All Fedora accounts can upload and edit the wiki (aside from some
protected namespaces
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:34:01 +0100
Kees de Jong keesdej...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to take over this orphaned package:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/orphaned/
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ddclient/
According to this webpage I should notify this
Following the example set by other packages, I've traditionally used
/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have a fact
that isn't written in Ruby? I'm also aware of /etc/facter/facts.d but I
suspect that's considered inappropriate for a package to use and should be
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 17:12 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Are CLI tools welcome in Gnome
Software?
No, we don't consider CLI tools to be applications, and only
applications should be displayed in GNOME Software.
See also:
https://developer.gnome.org/hig/stable/application-basics.html.en
On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote:
Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used
/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have
a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of
/etc/facter/facts.d but I suspect that’s considered
Am 23.12.2014 um 20:03 schrieb Samuel Sieb:
On 12/23/2014 10:24 AM, John Florian wrote:
Following the example set by other packages, I’ve traditionally used
/usr/local/share/ruby/site_ruby/facter/MY_PACKAGE, but what if you have
a fact that isn’t written in Ruby? I’m also aware of
I'm getting an incorrect FSF address when I'm building a package.
I checked here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
and built the package with the recommended file. Still get the error.
I checked the address with FSF, and what is in the COPYING file
On 2014-12-23 20:28, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
I'm getting an incorrect FSF address when I'm building a package.
I checked here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address
and built the package with the recommended file. Still get the error.
I checked the address
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Reindl Harald
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2014 14:10
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Where should a package place facter facts?
Am
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 11:28 -0800, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
Am I missing something here?
What package are you building, and what is the output from rpmlint? That
would help. It should point you to a specific file that it has flagged
as containing the outdated postal address.
(Be aware that this
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
The check is not only applied to COPYING but also to the license text in
source files. Have you checked those?
Got it. Thanks!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:54 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sat, 20 Dec 2014 19:05:24 +0100
valent.turko...@gmail.com valent.turko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
wiki admins please enable upload rights for valentt account so that
I can continue contributing to wiki.
All Fedora
Upstream had a few files that had the old address. I've noticed the GPLv3
doesn't have an address in it's notice. Is it sufficient to instruct
upstream
to just remove the address for GPLv2. Not that they're going to move
again, but seems to be alot of work for everybody if the address is
On 23/12/14 21:55, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
The check is not only applied to COPYING but also to the license
text in source files. Have you checked those?
Got it. Thanks!
You're
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, in many cases I been able to fix these problems by sending patches
rather than just complaints upstream. Basically, I think we (i. e. Fedora)
are the which are concerned about this, and in that situation we are the
On 12/22/2014 09:46 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/23/2014 05:30 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 12/22/2014 09:21 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Cobbler ships a tftp server written in python that integrates with (and
requires) cobbler. Cobbler requires a tftp server, and it would be nice
to be
Tom @ ncst.edu - hey perfect, thks for the repo solution - but in all
our conversion confusion lost your email with the repo address and can't
see it in archives - can you pls resend
*Gerald B. Cox* gbcox at bzb.us
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839751
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Simple:
38c925dc6b427cdc3831aaed685f952a Test-Simple-1.001011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit aa0e424607a054367d0fe13c5ce2ccc6cbbbca65
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Dec 23 11:53:17 2014 +
Update to 1.001011
- New upstream release 1.001011
- Fix windows test bug (GH#491)
- Integrate Test::Tester and Test::use::ok for easier downgrade
commit b0aa4289d0243f33ff6a39363c96b4d7c2fd55a4
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Dec 23 11:56:25 2014 +
Merged into perl-Test-Simple from F-22 onwards
.gitignore|1 -
dead.package |1 +
perl-Test-use-ok.spec | 137
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176825
Bug ID: 1176825
Summary: Test-Tester merged into Test-Simple upstream at
version 1.001010
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Test-Tester
Assignee:
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Simple-1.001011-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
aa0e424... Update to 1.001011
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176825
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
It turns out I didn't have sufficient rights to retire perl-Test-use-ok in
pkgdb, so could you do that one too please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-aliased:
af0b619806b8ecb764ee7e643c5541e9 aliased-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit af7d7b3f1dabb35cd351154e19a9ecc11fde07e6
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Dec 23 12:26:35 2014 +
Update to 0.33
- New upstream release 0.33
- Don't inherit from Exporter
- Fix docs issues
- Fix warnings on perl 5.21.6 and up (CPAN
commit 4a3a4c168bbdf847f95d066c48fb3f79842f2021
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Dec 23 12:32:22 2014 +
Remove unused patch
aliased-0.31-old-Test::More.patch | 16
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
The lightweight tag 'perl-aliased-0.33-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
af7d7b3... Update to 0.33
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176864
Bug ID: 1176864
Summary: ctstream-23 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: ctstream
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176931
Bug ID: 1176931
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176932
Bug ID: 1176932
Summary: perl-DB_File-1.835 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DB_File
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176933
Bug ID: 1176933
Summary: perl-Filter-1.53 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Filter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176935
Bug ID: 1176935
Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20141220 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Module-CoreList
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176936
Bug ID: 1176936
Summary: perl-Mozilla-CA-20141217 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mozilla-CA
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176938
Bug ID: 1176938
Summary: perl-Net-XMPP-1.05 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-XMPP
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176939
Bug ID: 1176939
Summary: perl-URI-Title-1.900 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-URI-Title
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176940
Bug ID: 1176940
Summary: perl-XML-Stream-1.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-XML-Stream
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176941
Bug ID: 1176941
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.55 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-YAML-LibYAML
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
47 matches
Mail list logo