A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Strip:
973d2325e0e75cc3c853adc7bb62252a HTML-Strip-2.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 10:10:03AM -0500, David Cantrell wrote:
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 09:32:04AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Chris Adams li...@cmadams.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Jan Staněk jsta...@redhat.com said:
The topic of BerkeleyDB v6 in Fedora was
commit 4bf3bfb9cbdd90022ab8d36cfd16cecf2ed14f9d
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 11 10:09:40 2015 +0100
Update to 5.90082
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Catalyst-Runtime.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 7
commit ab20cb472b3a4c06f8bc43b9ac15dde8e61b3047
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 11 10:17:18 2015 +0100
Update to 2.09
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-Strip.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hijk:
3f658771c3f810e5ab679f1da806ff2d Hijk-0.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Deep:
63bf86f7cddb09320c846acb1a1ec263 Test-Deep-0.115.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The only other approach I could see for the headless
servers would be mandating the enrollment in an identity domain at
installation time (such as to FreeIPA or Active Directory).
And in this scenario we should absolutely disable PermitRootLogin.
So that if you have issues with the
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed:
fc02c71c931ba54286ee73680b71a749 XML-Atom-SimpleFeed-0.861.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 08a0616d399cef26f4a9991307b4c982245ed714
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 11 10:23:24 2015 +0100
Update to 0.19
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Hijk.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit f22f1f566bed7736300ce9460e1b3a5d53089a66
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Jan 11 11:15:57 2015 +0100
Update to 0.861
.gitignore|1 +
perl-XML-Atom-SimpleFeed.spec | 20
sources |2 +-
3
2015-01-10 13:04 GMT+01:00 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com:
%exclude is global per spec file, or else you would need to %exclude
a file in _all_ subpackages (in the case when deleting it in %install
would be more convenient anyway). That would cause some pain in some
packages.
Is that
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Runtime:
b963f88abf718db895103c1bc9628831 Catalyst-Runtime-5.90082.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Compose started at Sun Jan 11 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
commit 2f5adcdd1a9274edafa811957c81634d941514f0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Jan 11 11:15:22 2015 +
Update to 0.115
- New upstream release 0.115
- Worked around a bug in chained goto on 5.8.5
perl-Test-Deep.spec |6 +-
sources |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180875
Bug ID: 1180875
Summary: file /usr/bin/bdftogd conflicts with file from package
gd-progs
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-GD
Assignee:
On Sun, 11 Jan 2015 12:32:04 +0100, Thomas Moschny wrote:
2015-01-10 13:04 GMT+01:00 Michael Schwendt:
%exclude is global per spec file, or else you would need to %exclude
a file in _all_ subpackages (in the case when deleting it in %install
would be more convenient anyway). That would
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-Deep-0.115-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
2f5adcd... Update to 0.115
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I'm orphaning pympdtouchgui - while it may still work I've never
actually used it myself and I do not know of any other user of the
package.
Additionally it hasn't been touched by $upstream in almost four years.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
devel mailing list
Hi folks! So I don't think we have anything particular to discuss at a
meeting tomorrow, thus according to the policy of not wasting people's
time with unnecessary meetings, I propose we cancel it. If anyone did
have something to discuss, please do reply to this mail!
We could possibly move
Hello,
People who have their names in the Fedora tcp_wrappers changelog added to CC
list..
Any comments about the below? Obviously aclexec feature would be useful for all
services using tcpwrappers/libwrap (ftp,telnet,tftp,ident,nfs, and many others),
and thus very nice to have.
Thanks,
--
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for aclexec in
tcp_wrappers via a custom patch since 2006,
so you can do this in /etc/hosts.allow or hosts.deny:
What do people feel about that? I'd like to see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180918
Bug ID: 1180918
Summary: yum install perl-IO-Socket-SSL.noarch demands
openssl-libs 1.0.1j-1, but we are at already at
1.0.1k-1
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
2015-01-11 20:42 GMT-03:00 Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Adrian Soliard
asoli...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press
Hi everyone!
I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press TAB.
It's complicated, if I forget to install a specific package, dnf
wouldn't show it to me, yum do it [1].
I know that dnf is newer, and surely will
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Adrian Soliard
asoli...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi everyone!
I'm struggling a bit with dnf. It may have advantages, but as an
end-user, I'm fighting with the list of packages when I press TAB.
It's complicated, if I forget to install a specific package, dnf
On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 01:34:14PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
We virtualize most of our
servers which ends up with even more weird problems of trying to get
working.
Could you expand on these problems you have with virtualized systems?
I wrote a tool called virt-rescue which should
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 09:29:08PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 12:16:38AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Hello,
I recently noticed Debian/Ubuntu has had support for aclexec in
tcp_wrappers via a custom patch since 2006,
so you can do this in /etc/hosts.allow or
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979143
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1003631
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007199
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1011333
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=745537
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=981243
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958821
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062576
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107543
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177672
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979143
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877072
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=903531
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|19 |20
--
You are
Hi,
Often not the case in small business or third party hosted
environments. Without remote ssh, box is unmanageable.
Even if you want to do key-based authentication rather than password,
you still need to use password initially to get the key onto the
remote box.
Just curious:
41 matches
Mail list logo