>> >>> > > that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will
>> >>> > > not use the lvm plugin. we make every buildroot from scratch
>> >>> > > using a fully clean environment to help with ensuring
>> >>> > > reproducability.
>> >> >
>> >> > You can cache and still preserve reproducability
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 17:18:17 +0100
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 01/14/2015 04:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >> On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> >>> > > that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will
> >>> > > not use the lvm
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 15:39 +0100, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
>
> There's a chance of a successful exploitation that would result in
> obtaining my privileges. Sure, gaining access to my account is bad
> enough, but if I run "su" or "sudo", they have root!
Along these lines, someone pointed out a ra
Compose started at Fri Jan 16 15:03:08 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015, at 04:41 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> > If it's installing a regular file, then it won't work - the package
> > (daemon) needs to create it on start.
>
> I filed a bug about this:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1182785
>
> Though I wonder if this should
On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:53:36 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Agreed. In principle, any package could affect the build of any other
> package (e.g. bash version could realistically influence build
> results), but we ignore this. As you say, something like this would
> happen only if the
Hi,
I've orphaned lua-sec, lua-dbi and prosody packages.
Feel free to take ownership of those ones.
Regards,
--
Johan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015, at 07:31 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> Let me emphasize especially need for somebody who will be able to look
> closely at and contribute to release engineering tools.
>
> I think it's clear that no bigger change how the fedora looks will
> happen without touching the tools we u
On 01/16/2015 05:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 16 January 2015 at 01:31, Bohuslav Kabrda mailto:bkab...@redhat.com>> wrote:
- Original Message -
> Honza Horak wrote:
> > * Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
> [snip]
> >* IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a min
On 16 January 2015 at 02:49, Honza Horak wrote:
> There are not many guys interested in the Environment & Stacks WG on the
> nomination page [2] so far, which is really shame. Don't loose your chance
> to help moving Fedora forward!
>
> The main goal of this working group is to research and devel
- Original Message -
> On 16 January 2015 at 01:31, Bohuslav Kabrda < bkab...@redhat.com > wrote:
> > - Original Message -
>
> > > Honza Horak wrote:
>
> > > > * Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
>
> > > [snip]
>
> > > > * IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a minimal set of packages
On 01/14/2015 04:00 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>> > > that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will not use
>>> > > the lvm plugin. we make every buildroot from scratch using a fully
>>> > > clean environment to help with ensuring reprod
On 16 January 2015 at 01:31, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Honza Horak wrote:
> > > * Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
> > [snip]
> > >* IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a minimal set of packages that give
> > > you a functional system, with some sort of approval
On 01/15/2015 03:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
So it's kWarning, not kDebug and it can't be ignored by using kdebugdialog
settings. There are two options - fix the underlying issue or change
kWarning to kDebug - it just depends on how important it is and it seem
as Harald alr
On 01/16/2015 01:39 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Agenda:
- Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids & nils!)
- Docker update
- Status rpm mechanisms for multiple config subpackages & factory
reset files
- F22 items
- DevConf
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
Logs:
Meeting ended Fri
Am 16.01.2015 um 10:50 schrieb Björn Persson:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
I'm with you, debugging spam needs to go away, GUI applications have
no business writing anything at all to the console, ever.
Except when they have really serious errors.
I once had an X problem that prevented Openoffice from
On 01/16/2015 03:39 PM, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
The discussion got rather long, but I didn't see one particular
On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 13:42 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no
The discussion got rather long, but I didn't see one particular aspect
discussed:
> Remote users would not b
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Jiri Popelka wrote:
> On 01/15/2015 04:24 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
>>
>> I look forward to future cooperation with you and thanks you all for
>> doing Fedora.
>
>
> Welcome Jakub !
Yes, welcome!
- Ken
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:19:13AM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
> wrote:
> > GCC change may affect binaries which will generate other output which
> > will change noarch packages.
>
> It shouldn't change a program's behavior, unless the pr
Agenda:
- Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids & nils!)
- Docker update
- Status rpm mechanisms for multiple config subpackages & factory
reset files
- F22 items
- DevConf
- Open Floor
Thanks & regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Ser
Let me emphasize especially need for somebody who will be able to look
closely at and contribute to release engineering tools.
I think it's clear that no bigger change how the fedora looks will
happen without touching the tools we use currently in Fedora -- be it
koji, dist-git, copr. Having s
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:08 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> GCC change may affect binaries which will generate other output which
> will change noarch packages.
It shouldn't change a program's behavior, unless the program itself is
relying on undefined behavior. Either way I would call that a b
Taskotron doesn't notice if subpackages have been dropped and cause
unresolvable dependencies because they are not obsoleted anywhere.
Examples: jogl2-javadoc, miglayout-examples, glusterfs-regression-tests
rubygem-json-doc, rubygem-rake-doc, and more
Yum is broken in the same way. And by desi
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>I'm with you, debugging spam needs to go away, GUI applications have
>no business writing anything at all to the console, ever.
Except when they have really serious errors.
I once had an X problem that prevented Openoffice from working. It
showed no window, output nothing, an
There are not many guys interested in the Environment & Stacks WG on the
nomination page [2] so far, which is really shame. Don't loose your
chance to help moving Fedora forward!
The main goal of this working group is to research and develop new or
improved methods of developing, testing, pack
On 16.1.2015 05:19, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at
07:45:00PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> > I personally know nothing of the subject, but found this article, I
wonder if
>> > there's any truth here? If so, maybe the push for dnssec on f22 isn't as
>> > wonderful as supposed:
>
On 01/15/2015 04:24 PM, Jakub Jelen wrote:
I look forward to future cooperation with you and thanks you all for
doing Fedora.
Welcome Jakub !
--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedor
W dniu 16.01.2015 o 09:35, Petr Spacek pisze:
> Another advantage could be mass-rebuild simplification. Maybe we could save
> machine and man-time by not rebuilding noarch packages because of gcc rebase
> or something like that.
GCC change may affect binaries which will generate other output which
On 15.1.2015 23:13, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2015-01-15 20:18 GMT+01:00 Orion Poplawski :
>
>> On 01/15/2015 04:20 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 01/14/2015 03:10 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 01/12/2015 06:08 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dear Fedora developers,
>
> I'd like to coll
- Original Message -
> Honza Horak wrote:
> > * Fedora Rings (hhorak, 12:03:21)
> [snip]
> >* IDEA: definition of ring 1 is a minimal set of packages that give
> > you a functional system, with some sort of approval (hhorak,
> > 13:31:21)
> >* IDEA: ring 1 should be self
commit 3e5a5586476ff5888e1636498a2dedadb23ee937
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Fri Jan 16 09:32:01 2015 +0100
Fix dependency filtering
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec | 10 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec b/perl-DateTime-Tim
On 01/15/2015 05:15 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:19:19AM +0100, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > Hi all.
> >
> > When upgrading F20 to F21 using FedUp, some users had a problem
> > with some packages not being upgraded (e.g. [1]). The problem was
> > caused by broken update path F20 ->
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 04:12:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 4:00 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > Jakub:
> >
> > I will test gcc 5 on my Rawhide aarch64 machine, if you can point me
> > to either a build of it or an SRPM. So far I see no gcc 5 builds in
> > either K
34 matches
Mail list logo
