On 01/23/2015 10:53 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
on servers and static machines you don't need any dynamic network
configuration
which is why NM in F22 will have a configure-and-quit mode for such
machines
-- Dan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- snip --
koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has not
mechanism to support using different backends. additionally some of the
builders are rhel6 so whatever is done has to work on rhel6 and fedora.
Huh, I was under the impression that everything was already migrated
commit e947996ee5f9c91f8880dc8b6d2d6ba89f4a612d
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:30:09 2015 +
Update to 2.132
- New upstream release 2.132
- Precision of version requirement 0.00 is preserved when merging
requirements
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Meta-Requirements-2.132-1.fc22' was created
pointing to:
e947996... Update to 2.132
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:59:31PM +0100, drago01 wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
libflashplayer.so runs within the Mozilla-plugin I believe. If so it
would be confined
if you have not turned on the unconfined_mozilla_plugin_transition
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Matthias Runge
mru...@matthias-runge.de wrote:
On 23/01/15 16:59, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
sandbox -X will also add more protection.
Unless I'm mistaken, sandbox -X hasn't worked in almost a year.
I gave it a try;
sandbox -X
/usr/bin/sandbox:
Dne Čt 22. ledna 2015 14:54:47, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 13:40 +0100, Jan Zelený wrote:
On 21. 1. 2015 at 11:07:31, Peter Robinson wrote:
1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so
everything is
ok here.
I really wonder what
On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
[1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185427
Bug ID: 1185427
Summary: col_0_fix.patch breaks rt-4.2.x
Product: Fedora
Version: 20
Component: perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables
Assignee: r.landm...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185427
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1121601
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185327
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed In
I have talked with the other 'owners' of python-paver and they have no
interest in keeping the package. It can be removed.
javasqlite is coming up next week to be removed.
-- Forwarded message --
From: opensou...@till.name
Date: 23 January 2015 at 06:24
Subject: [EPEL-devel]
commit 690877a71692ffd18584ed66b3b0fa9c8ade9ef7
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Jan 23 19:28:52 2015 +
Update to 1.01
- New upstream release 1.01
- Support wildcard-only value in complex search
- Support raw ElasticSearch filters in 'all'
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 03:15:10AM +0100, Haïkel wrote:
2015-01-21 11:49 GMT+01:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos n...@redhat.com:
snip
Besides, some submitters do not try hard enough to find reviewers:
* some reviews do not provide usable links to spec and srpm breaking usage of
semi-automated
2015-01-23 19:36 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com:
python-jinja2
Huh? In what way is it unmaintained?
- Thomas
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
On 23 January 2015 at 11:41, Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-01-23 19:36 GMT+01:00 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com:
python-jinja2
Huh? In what way is it unmaintained?
Sorry my sentence should have said is unmaintained or relies on an
unmaintained package which
commit 09947898a8ef4d371dd571bb31e0ce3737713844
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Sat Jan 24 07:33:18 2015 +1100
Upgrade to 0.11
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooX-Cmd.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff
Just FYI, we updated the koji hub(s) today.
We were hoping it would be a complete non event, but alas, there was a
short window where a link was not setup correctly and some builds
failed. ;( Sorry for the trouble and please do resubmit.
The old hubs were 32 bit rhel6 instances, and the new
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooX-Cmd:
bc42831ce83542ed416abfb0d387820a MooX-Cmd-0.011.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MetaCPAN-Client:
1f29e29648deaecfa69fe859be76be29 MetaCPAN-Client-1.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:33:27PM +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 23.01.2015 um 19:36 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
babel
This is wrong!
I assume this comes from a bug in your script which I already mentioned to
you.
This is a wrong assumption, because it is not the bug and the bug
commit 2ef675dec231783315ff842fbc14309aa274b744
Author: David Dick dd...@cpan.org
Date: Sat Jan 24 08:10:11 2015 +1100
Upgrade to 0.11
perl-MooX-Cmd.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-MooX-Cmd.spec b/perl-MooX-Cmd.spec
index
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:27:46 -0700
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
...snip...
There's one issue we are looking into to be aware of, builds now
give: SysCallError: (-1, 'Unexpected EOF')
instead of watching the build you just started. The build is running
fine and you can follow it on the
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:20:29PM -0600, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
On 9 January 2015 at 13:04, Mátyás Selmeci mat...@cs.wisc.edu
mailto:mat...@cs.wisc.edu wrote:
Are the orphan purges going to be batched in the future, or will
they be automatic once a package hits that 6-week mark?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:40:11 +0100
Jan Zeleny jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
-- snip --
koji internally writes out mock configs for every task and it has
not mechanism to support using different backends. additionally
some of the builders are
Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
My experience with the new package process is that the review process in
Step 6 doesn't work. For some of my packages it took 3 months for a
reviewer to appear, some others more, some where reviewed faster. My
understanding is that it depends on how interesting
Summary of changes:
0994789... Upgrade to 0.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
0994789... Upgrade to 0.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2ef675d... Upgrade to 0.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
(Cross-posted to the WG mailing lists; please reply only to devel@)
== Overview ==
Today in #anaconda, we had a discussion of the plans for network install
media for Fedora 22. We acknowledged that the network
Summary of changes:
2ef675d... Upgrade to 0.11 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-MetaCPAN-Client-1.01-1.fc22' was created pointing
to:
690877a... Update to 1.01
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185484
Bug ID: 1185484
Summary: CVE-2014-8630 Bugzilla: Command Injection into product
names and other attributes [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 21
Component: bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185483
Bug ID: 1185483
Summary: CVE-2014-8630 Bugzilla: Command Injection into product
names and other attributes
Product: Security Response
Component: vulnerability
Keywords:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185489
Bug ID: 1185489
Summary: permissions of dspamc different than dspam
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Component: dspam
Severity: low
Assignee: nathan...@gnat.ca
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185484
--- Comment #1 from Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185483
Kurt Seifried kseifr...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1185484
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185489
--- Comment #1 from Brian Kirkman kirkman.br...@gmail.com ---
Please change permissive to restrictive
... but calling dspamc to connect to the daemon
is too strikepermissivestrike/ restrictive for most applications, i.e.
dovecot-antispam.
(Cross-posted to the WG mailing lists; please reply only to devel@)
== Overview ==
Today in #anaconda, we had a discussion of the plans for network install
media for Fedora 22. We acknowledged that the network install (and more
generally, unattended installation) story in Fedora 21 was somewhat
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs:
* Fedora Server
- Server branding
- Default environment group: Fedora Server
- Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM on XFS (except /boot)
- Responsible WG: Server WG
I got bitten by the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185326
Bug ID: 1185326
Summary: perl-Cache-Cache-1.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Cache-Cache
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 23/01/15 13:12, John Florian wrote:
On 01/22/2015 03:17 PM, John Florian wrote:
If I read this page[1] correctly, python3-pyparted should be available
starting with F20, yet…
Did I miss something?
Looks like apps doesn't quite handle subpackages correctly. So while
pyparted
is in F20,
Dne 22.1.2015 v 15:30 Jan Zelený napsal(a):
On 22. 1. 2015 at 15:06:34, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:33:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 20.1.2015 v 14:22 Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a):
1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so everything is
ok here.
I really
user: tibbs set for tibbs acl: watchbugzilla of package: rt from: to: Approved
on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rt
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: tibbs set for tibbs acl: watchbugzilla of package: rt from: to: Approved
on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rt
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
user: tibbs set for tibbs acl: watchcommits of package: rt from: to: Approved
on branch: f21
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rt
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-01-26
# Time: 16:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
We haven't met for a bit, so let's get together and check in on where
we're all at. I'm expecting
user: tibbs set for tibbs acl: watchcommits of package: rt from: to: Approved
on branch: master
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rt
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Jan 23, 2015, at 5:34 PM, Paul Wouters p...@nohats.ca wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs:
* Fedora Server
- Server branding
- Default environment group: Fedora Server
- Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 07:45:21PM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Jan 21, 2015, at 8:00, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote:
Also I'd like to point out that if two packages offer the same provide, by
definition it means they are 100% exchangeable from the perspective of that
current kernels being removed
This was fixed almost a year ago
and other such issues
Name them please. Or better yet, report them.
That issue about removing core packages isn't fixed properly. I said I
would do some testing and had a little bit of spare time today so did
some testing, as I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185427
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Compose started at Fri Jan 23 05:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: bats-0.4.0-1.20141016git3b33a5a.fc22
Bash Automated Testing System
New package: perl-Dancer2-0.158000-1.fc22
Lightweight yet powerful web application framework
New package: radamsa-0.4-2.fc22
Test
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:41:53AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
I agree on the systemd-filesystem side of things, the binaries sounds
like it would be better described as systemd-utils with a provides for
- Original Message -
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
How exactly is Fedora Atomic generated? It seems that
fedpra-cloud-atomic.ks has no %packages section...
I can find out how we're doing with Atomic assuming I know how it's
constructed :)
It
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3].
ma.
[1]
Hi all,
From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX
documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage
(so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive).
(There's also a bug discovered when doing this split -- the python3 build
wasn't
Hello,
2015-01-23 11:04 GMT+01:00 Michel Alexandre Salim mic...@michel-slm.name:
Hi all,
From python-sphinx-1.2.2-6.fc22 onwards support for building LaTeX
documentation using Sphinx has been split off into the -latex subpackage
(so that Sphinx can be installed without pulling in TeXLive).
Hi Sergio,
Indeed, that is the same bug. I'm away from the computer until Monday, so
I'll do the stable release updates then - unless a comaintainer can do it
over the weekend.
The stable updates will probably be just bug fixes and won't introduce the
packaging split or version bump.
Cheers,
-
On 01/22/2015 03:58 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
This is not really true. Koji write out its own mock configs and will
not be using dnf for any operations. for anytime soon. koji hass no
way to use different tools to install chroots we will continue to use
yum to install the buildroots for the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185331
Bug ID: 1185331
Summary: perl-Net-Whois-Raw-2.82 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Whois-Raw
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185333
Bug ID: 1185333
Summary: perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.17 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Term-ProgressBar
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, at 08:07 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Which is something I find a really questionable idea btw. There's a
lot of stuff systemd does, and it's naive to believe you can just not
do them and get away with it in a container.
The discussion is more subtle than that - with
commit b73d9b5e25ab8d906240ab33cf33ee24182d5ba0
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 15:07:27 2015 +0100
Delete dual-living programs clashing on debuginfo files
perl.spec | 15 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl.spec
No specific agenda for today, but i'll be there in case there are any
points we want/need to bring up prior to DevConf.
So mainly:
Agenda:
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
--
Philipp Knirsch | Tel.: +49-711-96437-470
Manager Core Services| Fax.: +49-711-96437-111
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-CoreList:
5d9b60e1aa57fd41dc99c80dbdf4f205 Module-CoreList-5.20150120.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Encode:
8ac87548f2505ddf2e3890083c9d4855 Encode-2.68.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit fcc6218b9716c40e603bf69040587585cd87d67c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 15:38:52 2015 +0100
2.68 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139700
Ján Rusnačko jrusn...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jrusn...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184831
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
Are we covered with
$ rpm -q flash-plugin
flash-plugin-11.2.202.438-release.x86_64
?
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to modernize Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package fall off?
poma
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet
[1][2]. If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the
click-to-play mode for it.
Are
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for rt:
38bcc5d4eee480e70617175878f65c43 rt-4.0.22.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a97f6dc9d331886e5f5c83cb4537c7bceecd9c81
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 15:31:04 2015 +0100
5.20150120 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Module-CoreList.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before
created, but i always have this error:
[empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config
fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -n ssr
INFO: Processing local files: ssr
INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : Local files in
commit da56e9d4fd8c6baec7d1a1cca364d8eb7c540ae4
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 15:38:52 2015 +0100
2.68 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
7e612d4... Initial import. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Filter:
19bcf17323dba22b5dd0cfb8fdfa4a45 Filter-1.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185328
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Encode-2.68-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-2.68-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
Please update to latest version
On Fri 23 Jan 2015 03:33:51 PM CET Carlos Morel-Riquelme wrote:
Hi folks, i try to run fedora packager over spec and src.rpm files before
created, but i always have this error:
[empateinfinito@localhost review]$ fedora-review --mock-config
commit b6a5314e3f11ee1f262357cfa2e779ce1f7cc615
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:00:08 2015 +0100
1.54 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Filter.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On 01/23/2015 09:29 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
Until this is resolved, is this a valid way:
$ sandbox -X -T tmp -t sandbox_web_t firefox
to cover this security issue, or can we isolate only libflashplayer.so,
not the entire browser.
Daniel, can you comment.
commit 52908660854ffc8a029d808eef3c262e775854f7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:00:08 2015 +0100
1.54 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Filter.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit b4997aa288235659911ce679450f3b29eb827b37
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:00:08 2015 +0100
1.54 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Filter.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100
poma pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live
commit 35ccd3984080704737f1fc049160a9c64b1bffbb
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jan 23 16:28:18 2015 +0100
1.04 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Encode-Locale.spec | 30 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 23
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183576
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Filter-1.54-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Filter-1.54-1.fc21
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181529
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181529
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Encode-Locale-1.04-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Encode-Locale-1.04-1.fc20
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183576
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 01/23/2015 03:24 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
No specific agenda for today, but i'll be there in case there are any
points we want/need to bring up prior to DevConf.
So mainly:
Agenda:
- Open Floor
Thanks regards, Phil
Meeting ended Fri Jan 23 15:39:44 2015 UTC. Information about MeetBot
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to modernize Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package fall off?
Ticket https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47988
Patch:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47988/0001-Ticket-47988-Schema-learning-mechanism-in-replicatio.patch
Test case:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47988/0001-Ticket-47988-test-case.patch
--
389-devel mailing
Am 22.01.2015 um 18:44 schrieb poma:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are trying to modernize Fedora.
But what about RHEL relictum - initscripts, particularly now that we have
NetworkManager/ModemManager and systemd-networkd,
when will this package fall off?
hopefully never until
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/23/2015 04:29 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
On 01/23/2015 10:25 AM, poma wrote:
On 23.01.2015 15:12, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015 12:44:23 +0100 poma
pomidorabelis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
