Compose started at Mon Jan 26 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
Hi,
Also note that I have posted an update to vagrant-libvirt version 0.0.24
to the package review BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168333
I have also proposed a package for vagrant-lxc:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185685
The vagrant, vagrant-libvirt and vagrant-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 23.1.2015 v 23:34 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
>
> The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
> boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
>
Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons?
Vít
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
V
>> The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
>> boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
>>
>
> Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons?
Signing infrastructure for secure boot.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
> If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
> for it.
>
> There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3].
>
> ma.
>
> [1]
On 01/26/2015 12:29 PM, poma wrote:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
Are we covered with
$ rpm -q --changelog flash-plugin
On 26.01.2015 04:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 05:17:24PM +0100, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 16:02, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 06:44:08PM +0100, poma wrote:
Lukáš 'Allo 'Allo
I see that some people are tryin
On 26.01.2015 12:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 12:29 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>> Folk,
>>>
>>> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
>>> If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
>>>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:58 PM, poma wrote:
> On 26.01.2015 12:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 01/26/2015 12:29 PM, poma wrote:
>>> On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugi
Petr Machata writes:
> I'll rebase TBB to 4.3u2 next week.
This is now done in Rawhide. The F21 update is here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tbb-4.3-1.20141204.fc21
Thanks,
Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis
On 01/23/2015 10:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
for it.
There's also a Fedora Firefox update with such change [3].
ma.
[1]
https://isc.sans.edu
> Thanks for the encouragement. For the record, I filed
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184038 (GTK apps)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184868 (evince)
I very much recommend you to report these issues (also) to GNOME Bugzilla.
GNOME/GTK developers don't follow
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/23/2015 10:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>
>> Folk,
>>
>> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
>> If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
>> for it.
>>
>> There's al
Hello,
A few days ago I upgraded my main workstation to F21 and I've noticed a few
annoying glitches, but I don't know if they are all worth reporting and
against which components they should be reported.
1. Window size and position:
While some applications start with their last window size and p
On 01/26/2015 01:48 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:40 PM, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/23/2015 10:51 AM, Martin Stransky wrote:
Folk,
There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is not fixed yet [1][2].
If you use flash plugin I recommend you to enable the click-to-play mode
Installed Packages
Name: flash-plugin
Arch: x86_64
Version : 11.2.202.440
Release : release
Size: 19 M
Repo: installed
>From repo : adobe-linux-x86_64
Summary : Adobe Flash Player 11.2
URL : http://www.adobe.com/downloads/
License : Commerci
The warnings only happen when using development versions of GTK+. So it
shouldn't happen in F21, or in the future in F22, just in rawhide.
- Original Message -
> > Thanks for the encouragement. For the record, I filed
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184038 (GTK apps
On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
>
>
> Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
> 11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same. I see the Ubuntu
> update with .440 package but what's that?
>
> ma.
>
> [1] http://www.adobe.com/software/fla
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
> On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>
>>
>> Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
>> 11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same. I see the Ubuntu
>> update with .440 package but wh
On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>> On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
>>> 11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same.
On 01/26/2015 02:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
11.2.202.438 and flash downloa
On 01/26/2015 02:03 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky wrote:
Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same. I see the Ubuntu
upd
On 01/26/2015 01:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:58 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 26.01.2015 12:42, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 01/26/2015 12:29 PM, poma wrote:
On 23.01.2015 10:51, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Folk,
>
> There's a live 0-day flash vulnerability which is no
libmediaart in rawhide was upgraded to 1.9.0 (libmediaart-2.0) which
is an API/ABI incompatible break.
The dependencies - tracker and grilo-plugins have patches in upstream
git to adjust to the change and hopefully will be built for it in
rawhide later today.
Cheers
Yanko
--
devel mailing lis
Hi,
the source code repositories for the Initial Setup and python-meh
projects have been moved to GitHub:
https://github.com/rhinstaller/initial-setup
https://github.com/rhinstaller/python-meh
The legacy Firstboot tool, which is no longer in active development, has
not been moved and its source co
On 26 January 2015 at 15:16, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 02:12 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
>>
>> On 26 January 2015 at 15:03, drago01 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Ahmad Samir
>>> wrote:
On 26 January 2015 at 14:55, Martin Stransky
wrote:
>
>
>
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:15:11 +
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 07:42:20PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 01/24/2015 03:14 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > >I notice that Debian recently [since July 2014] started to
> > >recommend that packagers run autoreconf
On 01/26/2015 02:25 PM, poma wrote:
On 01/26/2015 01:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
Care to paste a link?
I can not find the changelog for flash-plugin, if such a thing even exists!?
https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsa15-01.html
Where do you see "11.2.202.440" there!?
Go
Hi Peter,
On Thursday, 2015-01-22 14:12:21 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> And the proper process link is at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Adding_Side_Build_Targets_SOP
Thanks.
I joined the f22-boost target for this that also needs a mass rebuild.
Eike
--
LibreOffice Calc developer. Numbe
I recently discovered that all search engines except Google (well, the
Google U.S. index) do not cover fedoraproject.org well (specifically,
lists.fedoraproject.org).
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=site%3Afedoraproject.org+%22Why+no+Class-Path+manifest+attribute%22
http://www.bing.com/search?q=site%3Af
Am 26.01.2015 um 13:55 schrieb Martin Stransky:
On 01/26/2015 01:48 PM, drago01 wrote:
The latest one is 11.2.202.440 ... which is supposed to have the fix.
Where have you got that? Official Adobe site [1] says the latest is
11.2.202.438 and flash download page [2] gives me the same. I see t
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Any idea why?
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/robots.txt
User-agent: *
Crawl-delay: 10
From Bing, "This means the higher your crawl delay is, the fewer pages
BingBot will crawl. As crawling fewer pages may result in getting less
content i
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
14 packages were orphaned
-
PyQt [el6] was orphaned by jgu
Python bindings for Qt3
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/PyQt
ScientificPython [el6] was orpha
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> A few days ago I upgraded my main workstation to F21 and I've noticed a few
> annoying glitches, but I don't know if they are all worth reporting
Yes. Glitches may be minor bugs, but bugs nonetheless.
> 1. Window size and position:
On 26.01.2015 15:13, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 02:25 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 01/26/2015 01:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
>
Care to paste a link?
I can not find the changelog for flash-plugin, if such a thing even
exists!?
>>>
>>> https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-pl
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
> >> boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
> >>
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons?
>
> Signing infrastructure for secure boot.
Actually, as I
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:53:27 -0700
Brandon Vincent wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Florian Weimer
> wrote:
> > Any idea why?
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/robots.txt
>
> User-agent: *
> Crawl-delay: 10
>
> From Bing, "This means the higher your crawl delay is, the fewer pages
On 01/26/2015 04:34 PM, poma wrote:
On 26.01.2015 15:13, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 01/26/2015 02:25 PM, poma wrote:
On 01/26/2015 01:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
Care to paste a link?
I can not find the changelog for flash-plugin, if such a thing even exists!?
https://helpx.adobe.com/security/prod
On 26.01.2015 17:05, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 04:34 PM, poma wrote:
>> On 26.01.2015 15:13, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>> On 01/26/2015 02:25 PM, poma wrote:
On 01/26/2015 01:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>>
>> Care to paste a link?
>> I can not find the changelog for flash-plugin, i
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Florian Müllner
wrote:
> Keeping track of the window size prior to maximization and restoring
> it on unminimize is the window manager's job. However if no windows
> besides Firefox are affected, I wouldn't exclude a bug there. Maybe
> some rogue add-on?
>
After
Last week, patch-2.7.3 was released fixing CVE-2015-1196. Both Fedora 20
and Fedora 21 have testing updates:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1165
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1134
The fix prevents patches applying if they are for symbolic links with a
tar
On 01/26/2015 05:20 PM, poma wrote:
What I asked you - "According to what I read in (German) media...",
care to paste a link, or you'll repeat again n gain what has already been said.
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Kritische-Luecke-im-Flash-Player-Adobe-beginnt-Update-Auslieferung-2527
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Florian Müllner
> wrote:
>>
> After a little bit of testing, I can confirm that it happens with every app.
> [...]
> Do I file this against mutter?
Yes please.
>> The desktop window is provided by n
Hi Fedora
I just wanted to give my impressions on the F21 install experience on
an iMac (but I guess it is applicable for any mac).
I installed F21 workstation on an Retina iMac after I made half the
SSD "free space". The installer set up all partitions and I went with
the default. Everything wor
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Problems
>
> Linux can't find the correct resolution of the screen, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184204
Not sure about that.
>
> The computer seems to boot into Linux as default, it would have been
> nice if you coul
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Jan Zelený wrote:
>> Name them please. Or better yet, report them.
>
> Any plans for local repository support in DNF.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991014
I'm working on this plugin.
>
> --
Hi, folks. A couple of people have tried to build rygel 0.25, which
bumps the API/ABI, but both times it failed. I just fixed it up and
got a build through:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=605336
so the sonames of its libs are bumped from:
librygel-core-2.4.so.2
librygel-r
2015-01-26 21:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy :
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>
>> Problems
>>
>> Linux can't find the correct resolution of the screen, see
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184204
>
> Not sure about that.
>
Um, what do you mean? Gnome at lea
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> 2015-01-26 21:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy :
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tunek
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Problems
>>>
>>> Linux can't find the correct resolution of the screen, see
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=118420
2015-01-26 22:18 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy :
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Andreas Tunek
> wrote:
>> 2015-01-26 21:32 GMT+01:00 Chris Murphy :
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:51 PM, Andreas Tunek
>>> wrote:
>>>
Problems
Linux can't find the correct resolution of the screen, see
I note the ReplaceYumWithDnf Change page:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
says nothing about fedup. However, fedup uses yum:
[adamw@adam fedup (master %)]$ grep -R yum * | wc -l
74
Has this been considered yet? Should porting fedup to dnf be in the
scope of this Change
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> I note the ReplaceYumWithDnf Change page:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
>
> says nothing about fedup. However, fedup uses yum:
>
Seems like fedup is only used on Fedora 21 and older to upgrade to
Fedora 22. S
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>> I note the ReplaceYumWithDnf Change page:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
>>
>> says nothing about fedup. However, fedup uses yum:
>>
>
> Seems like f
Dear contributors,
based on the Governance Charter [1], the first Environment and Stacks
working group elections were supposed to be held these days. We looked
for 4 new voting members for the group.
The nominations period ended few days back and there are exactly 4
nominations at [2]. Based
On 26.01.2015 17:38, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 05:20 PM, poma wrote:
>
>> What I asked you - "According to what I read in (German) media...",
>> care to paste a link, or you'll repeat again n gain what has already been
>> said.
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Kritische-Lue
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 13:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I note the ReplaceYumWithDnf Change page:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
>
> says nothing about fedup. However, fedup uses yum:
>
> [adamw@adam fedup (master %)]$ grep -R yum * | wc -l
> 74
>
> Has this be
Does anybody know if AutoService (
https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged for
Fedora? Maybe under a different name?
Upstream Apache Accumulo is considering adding it as a build dependency.
(It's Apache 2.0 licensed).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/c
On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Mattias Ellert wrote:
> tor 2015-01-22 klockan 10:48 -0700 skrev Jerry James:
>
> > 5. gap-pkg-sonata: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018
>
> > Please let me know what I can review for you in exchange. Thank you.
>
> Hi!
>
> About two weeks ago I
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 14:37 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Chris Murphy <
> li...@colorremedies.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Adam Williamson <
> > adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > > I note the ReplaceYumWithDnf Change page:
> > >
> > > https
On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 17:52 -0500, Will Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 13:26 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > I note the ReplaceYumWithDnf Change page:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceYumWithDNF
> >
> > says nothing about fedup. However, fedup uses yum:
> >
> > [adam
On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 11:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-24 at 11:05 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> >
> > With a change along those lines, I think we could plausibly look
> > at hard enforcement of the upgrade path, and it would be a good
> > improvement. It may be necessary
Greetings,
FESCo elections are now open and we're looking for five new
committee members. Elections closes promptly at 23:59 UTC
on February 3rd. Don't forget to vote!
To cast your vote, go to:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting
Read more about Fedora elections at
https://fedoraproject.org
On 26 January 2015 at 22:52, Will Woods wrote:
>
> (As an aside, PackageKit should also support these operations, so we can
> use PackageKit to make a Upgrade GUI Thing.)
>
Gnome Software has had some interesting work done in the 3.16 cycle to
handle upgrades.
For atleast the workstation produc
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dan Book wrote:
> Hello,
> I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this
> is something people would like to see become official. It's not ready for
> submission quite yet, there is a bit of a hack to change the default
> gtk-theme to
Dan, thank for the new but the download links for the spin (wiki skeleton)
isn't available :(
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Dan Book wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dan Book wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I have put together a basic Cinnamon Live spin, and was wondering if this
>> is some
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Carlos Morel-Riquelme <
empateinfin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dan, thank for the new but the download links for the spin (wiki
> skeleton) isn't available :(
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Dan Book wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Dan Book wrote
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi, folks. A couple of people have tried to build rygel 0.25, which
> bumps the API/ABI, but both times it failed. I just fixed it up and
> got a build through:
Thanks Adam, it needed a newer version of a lib which I notice the
maintainer
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 03:41 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > Hi, folks. A couple of people have tried to build rygel 0.25,
> > which bumps the API/ABI, but both times it failed. I just fixed it
> > up and go
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:43:55 +
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> >> The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6
>> >> boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL
>> >>
>> >
>> > Just out of curiosity, what are the reason
On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
> Does anybody know if AutoService (
> https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged for
> Fedora? Maybe under a different name?
It doesn't seem to be packaged.
For projects using Maven the easiest way of checking whether given
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski
wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
> > Does anybody know if AutoService (
> > https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already packaged
> for
> > Fedora? Maybe under a different name?
>
> It doesn't seem to be packa
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Christopher
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
>> > Does anybody know if AutoService (
>> > https://github.com/google/auto/tree/master/service) is already
>> packaged for
>> > Fedo
On 01/27/2015 06:48 AM, Christopher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Christopher
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 01/26/2015 11:57 PM, Christopher wrote:
Does anybody know if AutoService (
https://github.com/google/auto/tree
On 01/26/2015 10:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Has this been considered yet? Should porting fedup to dnf be in the
> scope of this Change? Does that affect its practicability for F22?
I was thinking about this in past beacuse I maintain fedora-upgrade(8).
If DNF is default for F22, then IMO al
On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 08:44 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 01/26/2015 10:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Has this been considered yet? Should porting fedup to dnf be in
> > the scope of this Change? Does that affect its practicability for
> > F22?
>
> I was thinking about this in past beacu
75 matches
Mail list logo
