https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193728
Bug ID: 1193728
Summary: perl-Inline-C-0.74 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Inline-C
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On 02/17/2015 03:48 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I'm starting to see a segfault in the plplot tests building on F23. I see
that the C code is calling some C++ code in this case. This has worked before
for a long time so I'm wondering what has changed it this regard.
valgrind reports:
11:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Hash-MultiValue:
508015312eb08cd2bcea987c4efbb93d Hash-MultiValue-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 20:28:09 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:55:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
1. fedup --network rawhide : failed with a missing image?
Why doesn't it work by default?
Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193721
Bug ID: 1193721
Summary: perl-DBD-Pg-3.5.1 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-DBD-Pg
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193418
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
cheeselee's perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.16-1.fc22 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612355
--
You are receiving this
On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:17:12AM -0800, Brian C. Lane wrote:
I'm trying to get the new version of maildrop ready and they split out
unicode support into a new library. The name of their archive is
courier-unicode, but the actual name of the library installed is
libunicode. That's what I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193727
Bug ID: 1193727
Summary: perl-Inline-0.79 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Inline
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
I'm starting to see a segfault in the plplot tests building on F23. I see
that the C code is calling some C++ code in this case. This has worked before
for a long time so I'm wondering what has changed it this regard.
valgrind reports:
11: ==28186== Invalid read of size 8
11: ==28186==at
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 2:40 PM, Matěj Cepl mc...@cepl.eu wrote:
On 2015-02-17, 13:17 GMT, Josh Boyer wrote:
Now, it is possible to do this in dnf (either with btrfs or with dm
snapshots) but I'm not aware of anyone working on it. Fedora has the
Snapper tool available in the repos, which
commit 2da02015a699e8f0416c4f44d4d1470fa25ec42d
Author: Robin Lee cheese...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Wed Feb 18 11:47:35 2015 +0800
Update to 0.16 (BZ#1193418)
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Hash-MultiValue.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files
Summary of changes:
2da0201... Update to 0.16 (BZ#1193418) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193418
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
cheeselee's perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.16-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612354
--
You are receiving this
Hi,
Lot of webapp in fedora repository requires httpd + mod_php
Reminder: since Fedora 21 we have now 3 working (out-of-the-box) way to
have a webserver with php enabled:
- apache + mod_php (the trivial way, but not the best for perf)
- apache + php-fpm (using network socket of UDS since F22)
-
I'm continuing the nonresponsive maintainer process for Axel Thimm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186467
Axel, your last login in FAS was on 2013-08-30 (according to
fedora_active_user.py) and your last official build in koji was on
2011-05-09
On 2015-02-17, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
== Proposal ==
With these things in mind, I'd like to propose that we amend the
packaging policy by splitting it into two forms:
I think this needs to go
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:11:46AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
Ugh. Good catch! It looks like liblockfile was added to EPEL7 by
accident.
I opened a ticket[1].
In the future, just retire the package in GIT/pkgdb and everything will
be done correctly.
Regards
Till
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)?
Because this would establish a 2-class society, with
commit 59534df0844596430264e685938c6fef7a845aee
Author: Wes Hardaker opensou...@hardakers.net
Date: Tue Feb 17 09:07:06 2015 -0800
require test::more for building
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit d903df44e65723eac65b3f17360599512dbd16e3
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 17:49:25 2015 +0100
5.20.2 bump; Resolved BZ#1177672
.gitignore |1 +
perl.spec | 22 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5
Greetings!
Fedora 22 Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline (testable) is in
one week - 2015-02-24 [1] and we're getting closer to this date.
Other important milestones are scheduled for this date:
* Alpha Freeze
* Software String Freeze
* Bodhi activation point
At this point, all accepted
Summary of changes:
5d7a0af... Fix regression with Debug::Client (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015
3 days, 5 hours remaining
I don't believe Fedora will be applying to this any
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum:
5673ee17919231c6394382e48f80c582 Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
c9730d5... new 0.15 release
3a81e36... merged
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
commit 3a81e36f5cf7c288f547d280f2409e25ee9faabc
Merge: c9730d5 6df5940
Author: Wes Hardaker opensou...@hardakers.net
Date: Tue Feb 17 07:21:25 2015 -0800
merged
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec | 19 +++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --cc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=991649
Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl:
21062666f1c627aeb6dbff3c6952738b perl-5.20.2.tar.bz2
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:54:24AM +0800, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule
Also RH and other distros history repeatedly has told the lesson
such will not fly and are doomed to fail.
It seems to have been working just fine in RPMFusion, where the free
and nonfree repositories have different standards for inclusion, and
where packages in nonfree can depend on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188816
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
hardaker's perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.10-2.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=612221
--
You are receiving
Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:02:32 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
1. fedup --network rawhide : failed with a missing image?
Why doesn't it work by default?
Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks good here, and
the images look fine. Ah... it's because they are
commit d493078b23c89ecca1db826a88016ec6f2b41d20
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 17:37:18 2015 +0100
Update patches
3-Install-libperl.so-to-shrpdir-on-Linux.patch |2 +-
20.1-Fix-Errno.pm-generation-for-gcc-5.0.patch |9 -
2 files
commit 844f0cc11df9b6798856103ecc5db552ade85aa1
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 17:49:25 2015 +0100
5.20.2 bump; Resolved BZ#1177672
.gitignore |1 +
perl.spec | 22 ++
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 5
On 02/17/2015 05:54 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and the
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:21:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
I may have misunderstood the conversation I'm remembering. Apologies
for any confusion.
The main issue is that we as a project can't take any money, even if Google
really wants to send it somewhere. I don't think there's a problem as
On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)?
Because this would establish a 2-class society, with double standards
On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and the new easy-for-beginners repository)?
Because
On 02/17/2015 02:19 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
Hi,
There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them:
libntlm
python-durus
barry
spambayes
rblcheck
tokyocabinet
jaxodraw
flterm
libquvi
libquvi-scripts
quvi
python-django-socialregistration
dayplanner
gengetopt
1. fedup --network rawhide : failed with a missing image?
Why doesn't it work by default?
2. yum distro-sync with rawhide repo enabled : first encountered
upgrade path violation problems, unresolved deps. Then after enabling
only the rawhide repo, it locked up hard after updating ~900
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:07:37AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:35PM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign
of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:35PM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign
of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from
planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any specific reason for this?
Often, those
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:12:35PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
Often, those posts were not Fedora related, and generally out of our
control. I'm glad you found them usually interesting — that's valuable
feedback.
I was under impression Fedora about community and friendship.
Not about
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:07:37AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign
of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from
planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any specific reason for this?
Often, those
commit 1a0d65d74075d554f084e50e5f8976990fd917f2
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 17:37:18 2015 +0100
Update patches
3-Install-libperl.so-to-shrpdir-on-Linux.patch |2 +-
20.1-Fix-Errno.pm-generation-for-gcc-5.0.patch |9 -
2 files
Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:53 AM, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via
btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs
install was not setup correctly to make this feasible
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
https://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/homepage/google/gsoc2015
3
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:43:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random:
b89ca9314c3a066b440a7bb3cb8d725d Crypt-OpenSSL-Random-0.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c9730d5087eb13358355439b5121c1f00201fc40
Author: Wes Hardaker opensou...@hardakers.net
Date: Tue Feb 17 07:16:53 2015 -0800
new 0.15 release
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
The lightweight tag 'perl-Config-Tiny-2.22-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
531b6f0... Update to 2.22
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967719
Fedora End Of Life endofl...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
commit 5d7a0af530a655bb9cdeb60351871858ea7a3711
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 14:58:10 2015 +0100
Fix regression with Debug::Client
...-Propagete-PerlIO_return_value_from_STORE.patch | 120
perl-Term-ReadLine-Gnu.spec|
commit 5132435dbb359b5a8e5324d53b9a3e61c9fabf5a
Author: Wes Hardaker opensou...@hardakers.net
Date: Tue Feb 17 07:19:07 2015 -0800
new 0.06
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Bignum.spec |9 ++---
sources|2 +-
3 files changed,
Dne 17.2.2015 v 13:53 Neal Becker napsal(a):
Some time back there was discussion of being able to rollback yum updates via
btrfs snapshotting. As I recall, it turned out that the default btrfs
install
was not setup correctly to make this feasible (I had briefly tested it on my
machine).
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
== Proposal ==
With these things in mind, I'd like to propose that we amend the
packaging policy by splitting it into two forms:
I think this needs to go beyond simple policy. It needs some
buildsystem enforcement
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:43:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:13:49AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
ita...@ispbrasil.com.br wrote:
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA:
553cda4c9c34298f96ee562ed64acbd7 Crypt-OpenSSL-DSA-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:21:47AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:48 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 09:43:45AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:36 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon pin...@pingoured.fr
wrote:
On Tue,
Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org writes:
We should not include preprocessed source files by default without the user
knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still.
There's a check box to this effect in ABRT. It's not much different
from sending backtraces or some
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189459
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189459
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:17 AM, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com wrote:
odb-2.3.0-8.fc22.src.rpm
build failure because the gcc plugin API has changed.
odb has been updated to 2.4.0 which supports the new gcc 5.0 plugin API,
but whenever I try to do the rebuild it fails to find
Summary of changes:
531b6f0... Update to 2.22 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Planned Outage: Migration to gitolite3 - 2015-02-19 09:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-02-19 09:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '2015-02-19
commit e9ea9cd182e19e41fa4c3662d0abd717b0c8a4ef
Author: Wes Hardaker opensou...@hardakers.net
Date: Tue Feb 17 07:14:22 2015 -0800
new 0.10 release
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-Random.spec |7 +--
sources|2 +-
3 files
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 09:55:37 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
1. fedup --network rawhide : failed with a missing image?
Why doesn't it work by default?
Strange. The mirrormanager mirrorlist for images looks good here, and
the images look fine. Ah... it's because they are not signed.
|
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44:01AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
long as
I think someone needs to step up as the main coordinator for Fedora
and work with OSAS to make sure this is set.
... that.
This would be nice, because I see an opportunity to get some development
done for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187912
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Redis-1.978-1.el7
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 06:10:13PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
I could put them under fedor...@fedoraproject.org ?
Please use fedora-xx-primary and fedora-xx-secondary, these are now used
starting with Fedora 23.
Regards
Till
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181654
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Apache-Session-NoSQL-0.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187912
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Redis-1.978-1.fc21
Rex Dieter wrote:
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
and now Qt(4) doesn't build either, bug,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192464
Any help, advice would be appreciated (particularly input from gcc
maintainers).
FESCo, work on the Plasma5 change/feature is suffering due to this.
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
96
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0610/qpid-cpp-0.30-9.el7
12
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181654
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Apache-Session-NoSQL-0.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2015-02-17 14:11 GMT+01:00 adamw...@fedoraproject.org:
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 22 Branched 20150217. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 9:37 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 04:02:35PM +0530, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign
of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1031
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
486
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
250
Am 17.02.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (between current
Fedora and
Well, I understand your point Matthew. Yes, often the post are on the
geekier side and may not be related to Fedora project as such, but most
of them are about Linux in general and day to day problems/solutions in
a Linux user's life. I am not aware of the intentions behind the Planet
Fedora
#16: xrootd major move to 4.
--+
Reporter: smooge | Owner: epel-wranglers
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone:
Component: Package request |Version:
Small patch to drop the stuff about Koji from the install guide, as
fedfind doesn't need it any more.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.netFrom b131fe1bcabf6c72ab373f55941b49600c492b0c
Revised:
This patch started writing the test suite for 389 DS. Eventually all of
TET will be ported to lib389 tests in 389 DS.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48003
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48003/0001-Ticket-48003-build-suite-framework.patch
--
389-devel mailing
I'm orphaning the kmplayer package (for f22+), last release was ~3 years
ago, and it's project site @ http://kmplayer.kde.org/ is no more.
(not sure if it's related at all to http://kmplayer.com/ , but that one
doesn't appear to be opensource)
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193417
Bug ID: 1193417
Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-2.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi All,
FUDCon - The Fedora Users Developers Conference is back and this
time to be held in Pune – one of the premiere IT Software hubs of
India!. FUDCon is a major free and open source software event held in
various regions around the world, with the aim of bringing Fedora
community
Not that I know of.
On 02/16/2015 09:50 AM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
Thanks! Are there tracking bugs in Bugzilla I can subscribe to?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 9:42 AM, Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com wrote:
On 02/16/2015 12:31 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:19
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-BDB:
b337bb3a52d911b9024b0587b2589dcb BDB-1.91.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193418
Bug ID: 1193418
Summary: perl-Hash-MultiValue-0.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Hash-MultiValue
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
commit 4d3abe2a12b8a5b1c46104704af33655feb7ef9f
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 11:12:27 2015 +0100
Sanitize the package
perl-Date-HolidayParser.spec | 33 +++--
1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193414
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
Hi All,
Hope its the right place to discuss this. Recently, during the redesign
of the start.fedoraproject.org page, the links to updated/new posts from
planet.fedoraproject.org were removed. Any specific reason for this?
I, for one, used those links for quickly going through the new blog
posts.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:14:43AM +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:26:57AM -0500, David Airlie wrote:
Just kicked off an Xserver build in rawhide,
and it appears gcc ICE.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=8960146name=build.log
libtool:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:45:09AM +, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 17/02/15 07:21, David Airlie wrote:
Well I can't provide any info, I don't have an ARM box here, and it
happens in the buildroot which I don't think I can
user: kwizart set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-Regexp-Assemble
from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Regexp-Assemble
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 08:05:30PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 17.02.2015 um 17:54 schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
Le mardi 17 février 2015 à 17:39 +0100, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 02/17/2015 05:18 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as
Stephen
On 2015-02-17, 13:17 GMT, Josh Boyer wrote:
Now, it is possible to do this in dnf (either with btrfs or with dm
snapshots) but I'm not aware of anyone working on it. Fedora has the
Snapper tool available in the repos, which could do snapshotting
outside of dnf as well.
Yeah, just that I was
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: watchcommits of package: perl-BDB from:
Approved to: Approved on branch: f20
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
user: jplesnik set for jplesnik acl: approveacls of package: perl-BDB from:
Approved to: Approved on branch: f22
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-BDB
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
1 - 100 of 210 matches
Mail list logo
