On 27 February 2015 at 11:02, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 25, 2015 3:14 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
For those not following along with the FPC ticket, Toshio and Tomspur
have a nice write-up of the options at
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/2Uqk0ikCll
I
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:02:59PM +0100, Harald Hoyer wrote:
Agenda:
- Interview candidates for new memberships
- Optionally accept new members
- Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch
- Open Floor
Please add items by replying to this mail.
Unfortunately
On 25 February 2015 at 16:43, Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:35 AM, Ali AlipourR alipoo...@gmail.com wrote:
Why sysrq is limited to only sync command on official fedora kernel?
The kernel itself isn't limited. It's just set that way in
On 02/27/2015 05:32 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Nordgren, Bryce L -FS wrote:
I notice that ipython has not been released in epel7, but has a
release version for epel6 and Fedora 20-22. Was there a decision to
exclude it from epel, or is this due
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Tomas Bzatek tbza...@redhat.com
wrote:
I've just made the packages listed below orphan due to my departure
from
my current employer. Unfortunately I won't be able to invest my
personal
free time either.
fpc: epel7 el6 el5
lazarus: epel7 el6 el5
tuxcmd
udisks2
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48108
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48108/0001-Ticket-48108-replace-fprintf-with-ns_log.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100706
--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9081016
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196648
Bug ID: 1196648
Summary: perl-Net-Statsd-Server-0.19 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Net-Statsd-Server
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196444
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
psabata's perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=615383
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1192377
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
On 02/26/2015 09:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 10:39:35 AM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other post
in this thread), which would always require
On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 09:00 +0100, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 08:36 PM, Sumit Bhardwaj wrote:
Hi All,
I have been reading this mail chain for some time and there is something I
wanted to say. It's kind
of a long mail, I apologize for taking so much of your time but request you
On 02/26/2015 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:06:03 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/26/2015 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196763
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 09:49:48 +0100
Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes, we need to maintain both stacks for a while anyways for e.g.
lxde users, etc. Given that XFCE now supports libinput too, we could
reconsider this and make xorg-drv-libinput a hard dep of the X server
so that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196763
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48039
DS Patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48039/0001-Ticket-48039-nunc-stans-malloc-should-be-pluggable.patch
nunc-stans patch
On 02/26/2015 05:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:06:03 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 02/26/2015 04:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196763
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
---
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 18:22 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:21 PM, Mario Torre wrote:
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:37 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/24/2015 02:15 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/24/2015 12:43 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
I am against official guidelines or
Am 26.02.2015 um 16:37 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
really?
why?
how do you come to that weird conclusion?
surely, one can say not my package, not my problem but that's
ignorant and needs no guidelines and policies - sanity should be enough
I
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:51:46AM -0700, Pete Travis wrote:
The only time I've needed sysrq reboots in recent memory was while running
rawhide and knowingly venturing into uncharted territory. If I'm not the
only one, would it make sense to include appropriate sysctl snippets in
Hi folks today i update to F22 Workstation ( fresh install ) and well when
the adwaita dark theme is active, the textfield of Firefox 35 have as
background color ( white) and the text have the same color.
here a example of devel list page
firefox + adwaita dark
On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Small restart.
Looking to the discussion, although many people claimed against any
rules at the end it seems to me that everybody agree on some rules -
even if it would be existence of metapackage or only removed virtual
provides and priority
- Original Message -
From: Mario Torre neug...@redhat.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 4:59:35 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On
- Original Message -
From: Robert Marcano rob...@marcanoonline.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 5:20:04 PM
Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java
platform in Fedora
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav
==
#fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-02-26)
==
Meeting started by hhorak at 13:02:49 UTC. The full logs are available
at
On 02/26/2015 02:10 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
really?
why?
how do you come to that weird conclusion?
surely, one can say not my package, not my problem but that's
ignorant and needs no guidelines and policies - sanity should be enough
I guess you did not grasp I was referring to the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196444
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc22
--
You are receiving
On 02/26/2015 02:46 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
Also, my proposal of introducing java metapackage (see my other
post
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java
On Feb 25, 2015 1:50 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 25.02.2015 um 21:38 schrieb Zdenek Kabelac:
Dne 25.2.2015 v 18:44 Reindl Harald napsal(a):
Am 25.02.2015 um 18:37 schrieb Paul Wouters:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hmm? Syncing is allowed to my
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:26:32 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1304/9081304/root.log
On 02/26/2015 04:21 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Hi
But in f23 it still failed on geos linking...
---
./.libs/libosm2pgsql.a(geometry-builder.o): In function
`geometry_builder::parse_wkt(char const*, osmNode***, int**,
On 02/26/2015 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and without the ownership model it would have been prevented
what model would you use?
you can't only say that model is wrong without any alternative
I have already mentioned alternative before no need to repeat that
proposal to you.
Bottom
On 02/26/2015 03:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 26.02.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and without the ownership model it would have been prevented
what model would you use?
you can't only say that model is wrong without any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195991
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Tangerine-0.13-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Tangerine-0.13-1.fc22
--
You are receiving this
On 02/26/2015 04:20 PM, Robert Marcano wrote:
On 02/24/2015 05:04 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently
Am 26.02.2015 um 16:54 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 03:49 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
and without the ownership model it would have been prevented
what model would you use?
you can't only say that model is wrong without any alternative
I have already mentioned alternative
Without consent from FPC such shift would be problematic.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196444
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194265
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195094
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190421
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193419
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-List-Compare-0.48-1.fc21
--
You are receiving
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
Sorry for the somewhat slow reply, but I've been thinking about all of
this I guess, primarily,
On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
Currently Fedora supports one main Java runtime and Java
The lightweight tag 'perl-strictures-2.00-1.fc22' was created pointing to:
5cb191a... Update to 2.00
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 26.02.2015 um 15:05 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 02/26/2015 01:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-List-Compare:
533457924eceadae61960a89c4cc6aea List-Compare-0.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196648
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9081105
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
Hi there
this is a heads up notice that I intend to retire kde-plasma-daisy, the
reasons being:
- no upstream updates in almost 3 years
- FTBFS in rawhide because there's no kde-workspace{-devel}
- I don't use it myself.
- Repackaging for Plasma 5 would probably require a new package
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 03:15:22PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:20:35PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Strictly speaking[1], I don't need a permission to do so. Still, I would
like to ask for opinions here.
It will not be pushed until after alpha
Hi,
I need ccrtp, libzrtpcpp and dbus-c++ to be rebuilt against GCC5 to get
sflphone building [1].
Thanks,
Sandro
[1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4328/9074328/build.log
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:36:31PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi,
I need ccrtp, libzrtpcpp
Building those two now.
and dbus-c++ to be rebuilt against GCC5 to
get sflphone building [1].
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-strictures:
272d98533003581f42cafebfd95bfc5b strictures-2.00.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in
Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
== Detailed Description ==
This is no real work proposal.
Stepping back, I’m not sure this has been said explicitly: this is really a
packaging
The lightweight tag 'perl-strictures-2.00-1.fc23' was created pointing to:
5cb191a... Update to 2.00
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100706
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, 11 Feb 2015 15:53:50 +0100
Tim Flink tfl...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:27:09 +0100
Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
Hi Tim,
I'm replying to your questions from December.
yes, the secondary arches follow the same process as primary, they
have blocker bugs,
Yesterday I was browsing the Fedora pkgdb/git/bohdi pages and this morning I
returned to go backwards thru my web browser history when I stumbled upon a
real hidden gem for a HTTP 500 response. Our hot dog armed with a ray gun
against a nuclear panda... oh man that was great. Best 500 I've
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:20:35PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Strictly speaking[1], I don't need a permission to do so. Still, I would
like to ask for opinions here.
It will not be pushed until after alpha release unless it gets an exception.
[1]
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1304/9081304/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1319/9081319/root.log
Ralf
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:43 AM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 5:40 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
i686 has nothing to do with ARM. So when someone says i686 he/she
means 32bit x86.
Well yes -- that's what *I* take it to mean -- I just
Summary of changes:
a656988... 0.48 bump, yet even more performance improvements (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
a656988... 0.48 bump, yet even more performance improvements (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a656988c9cff73970332d6325c7968ff57932da7
Author: Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 26 13:44:31 2015 +0100
0.48 bump, yet even more performance improvements
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-List-Compare.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 6
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 08:04:54AM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:33:57PM +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
On 27/01/15 11:51, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Hello,
** A build containing latest Django will be pushed to f22 branch late in
dev
cycle. If we decide not to
commit 5cb191a1c2e99048e41b208425dd19c93b5a8eb7
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Feb 26 13:58:49 2015 +
Update to 2.00
- New upstream release 2.00
- INCOMPATIBLE CHANGE:
- strictures 2 fatalizes only a subset of warnings; some warning
Summary of changes:
5cb191a... Update to 2.00 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:11:33 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Hi,
seems to me as if koji has seized operation:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1304/9081304/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1319/9081319/root.log
I guess this is the
On 02/26/2015 01:29 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 05:13:53PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Sure I have a stake in systemd, but certainly none in
fedora-release.rpm. But even for systemd, there are a number of people
Sorry for the somewhat slow reply, but I've been
On 02/26/2015 08:31 AM, John Florian wrote:
Yesterday I was browsing the Fedora pkgdb/git/bohdi pages and this
morning I returned to go backwards thru my web browser history when I
stumbled upon a real hidden gem for a HTTP 500 response. Our hot dog
armed with a ray gun against a nuclear panda…
Jerry James wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:53 AM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Does
%undefine _hardened_build
help?
that version works for me
Hmmm, am I doing something wrong? I've tried both:
%undefine _hardened_build
and:
%undefine
I've just made the packages listed below orphan due to my departure from
my current employer. Unfortunately I won't be able to invest my personal
free time either.
fpc: epel7 el6 el5
lazarus: epel7 el6 el5
tuxcmd
udisks2
Feel free to pick up any.
--
Tomas Bzatek tbza...@redhat.com
--
devel
On 2015-02-26, 16:22 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That should be completely unrelated to the kojipkgs issue, as that is
talking to the koji hub directly.
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
This is usually very clear and obvious way how Koji tells me
that my
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:22:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
I'm not sure. It's some issue with your communication to the koji
hub...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196763
Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196763
Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging on
to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get much of
anymore. So if you to be a comaintainer or want to take over anything
On 02/26/2015 06:44 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2015-02-26, 16:22 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That should be completely unrelated to the kojipkgs issue, as that is
talking to the koji hub directly.
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
This is usually very clear and
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:22:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
I'm not sure. It's some issue with your communication to the koji
hub...
Can you do a:
koji list-tasks --mine
# koji list-tasks --mine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196784
Bug ID: 1196784
Summary: perl-CHI: epel7 branch
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CHI
Severity: medium
Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
Reporter:
On 02/26/2015 06:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 17:22:01 +0100
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
And would you have the kindness to tell me what I can to about it?
I'm not sure. It's some issue with your communication to the koji
hub...
Meanwhile I rebooted (for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196763
--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Sweetness!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Máirín Duffy du...@fedoraproject.org
wrote:
On 02/26/2015 08:31 AM, John Florian wrote:
Yesterday I was browsing the Fedora pkgdb/git/bohdi pages and this
morning I returned to go backwards thru my web browser history when I
stumbled upon a real
Hi Rahul,
I wish you all the best in your new job :)
I suggest that you add the python-sig as co-maintainers for your
python packages.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/group::python-sig/
Regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196784
--- Comment #1 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de ---
(In reply to Denis Fateyev from comment #0)
Please add epel7 branch for perl-CHI module.
1. I do not support epel. Feel free to package it for epel7 yourself.
2. Adding perl-CHI to
Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com schrieb am Do., 26. Feb. 2015 um
00:14 Uhr:
On 5 February 2015 at 17:48, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 February 2015 at 21:01, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote:
- Original Message -
I don't really feel strongly about this, I
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
I will take deluge.
FAS: mooninite
Done
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Hello,
This fix allows to protect several backends with a global lock
during update operations.
It is configurable and by default the global lock is not enabled.
Under rare condition some plugin may lead to deadlocks. Global lock
would be enabled to prevent those deadlocks
On 02/26/2015 01:43 PM, Dave Melia wrote:
Are you interested in being a mentor and allow me to assist with Deluge? :)
Sure. Apply for commit access.
Regards,
Michael
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of
Hi
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
Congrats to the new job!
I'd take
* python-kombu
* python-gdata
* python-billiard
Thanks and done.
* django-* packages should be all become retired.
I have orphaned them since they have EPEL branches.
Rahul
--
devel
Hi Michael,
Are you interested in being a mentor and allow me to assist with Deluge?
:)
Regards,
Dave
On 2015-02-26 19:22, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 02/26/2015 12:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1040
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
495
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
259
On 02/26/2015 12:06 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging on to
them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get much of
anymore. So if you to be
On 26/02/15 19:06, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I would like to give away as many packages as I can to others who are
interested. My current job keeps me pretty busy and I have been hanging
on to them in hopes of finding the elusive free time that I don't get
much of anymore. So if you to be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195862
--- Comment #2 from Denis Fateyev de...@fateyev.com ---
The author (Michael G Schwern) wrote: Yes, 'same as Perl' means dual Artistic
+ GPL. This is the text it should have.
So we're fine with the existing version.
--
You are receiving this
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo