SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

Hi, as some already might have noticed, Coin3 is about to land in Fedora. Therefore, I rebuilt SIMVoleon and SoQt (two addon-packages to Coin), against Coin3 on rawhide and f22. I do not expect this to impose problems to Fedora, because I can't spot any packages depending on these in Fedora.

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/26/2015 04:26 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: "Robert Marcano" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 5:20:04 PM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora On 02/24/2015 05:04

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/24/2015 10:34 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek Currently Fedora supports one m

Re: koji is broken

Ralf Corsepius venit, vidit, dixit 26.02.2015 19:09: > On 02/26/2015 06:44 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >> On 2015-02-26, 16:22 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote: That should be completely unrelated to the kojipkgs issue, as that is talking to the koji hub directly. >>> >>> And would you have the kindne

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 25/02/15 00:31, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform >> in Fedora = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora >> >> Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek > > IMHO, this is not implementable for a sim

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 26/02/15 14:59, Mario Torre wrote: > In this case, it's about giving users one thing they asked, which is > easy access to a previous version of Java. We can't afford > maintaining it as Java Team, but this doesn't mean we will refuse to > help people doing it. In fact, the exact existence of t

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Jiri Vanek" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:43:53 AM > Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java > platform in Fedora > > On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 02/24/2015

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:46 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 02/26/2015 02:46 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > > On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > >> On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: > >>> On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 02/26/2015 08:42 AM, Jiri Vanek w

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 11:48 AM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: On Thu, 2015-02-26 at 15:46 +0100, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 02:46 PM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/26/2015 10:13 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/26/2015 09:23 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote: On 02/26/2015 09:20 AM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: On 02/

Re: [Scitech] OpenBabel rebase to pre-2.4 (current Git master)

Do we need to tell upstream about these patches? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: koji is broken

On 02/27/2015 11:15 AM, Michael J Gruber wrote: Ralf Corsepius venit, vidit, dixit 26.02.2015 19:09: Yes Ralf, fedora-cert is the better way to deal with the certs (rather than re-running setup). We used to be able to download a new cert from FAS. That page seems to be MIA now without any ref

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 11:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jiri Vanek" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:43:53 AM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora On 02/26/2015 02:51 PM, J

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Jiri Vanek" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:54:04 PM > Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java > platform in Fedora > > On 02/27/2015 11:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtak

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

- Original Message - > From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:58:05 PM > Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java > platform in Fedora > > - Original Message - > >

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 11:58 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: - Original Message - From: "Jiri Vanek" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 12:54:04 PM Subject: Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora On 02/27/2

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with > the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That > way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME > (just like they do with other JVMs). Th

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 10:58 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > The problem with alternatives is they are system wide so if one changes the > alternatives to point to the legacy JDK for their third party app this > becomes the JDK system wide. Thus all Fedora packaged Java apps (Tomcat, > Jetty, JBoss, Fre

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME (

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - > From: "Jiri Vanek" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 1:42:53 PM > Subject: Re: F22 System Wide

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 12:57 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: Shouldn't this one replace 3). As if there are no alternatives, priorities are meaningless. Sound good. J. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Message - From: "Jiri Vanek" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: F

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/27/2015 12:04 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: On 02/27/2015 10:47 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: If we want to be sure that this legacy jdk will not interfere with the system JDK let it not provide anything via alternatives. That way people that want it can use it by playing with PATH/JAVA_HOME (

qt3 rebuild in f23?

pdfedit depends on qt3 and fails to link in f23: .obj/mergeform.o: In function `gui::MergeDialog::initFileList(QString&)': mergeform.cc:(.text+0xf94): undefined reference to `QString::QString(std::__cxx11::basic_string, std::allocator > const&)' .obj/propertyeditor.o: In function `gui::Propert

Orphaning rubygem-spruz

Hi, I am orphaning rubygem-spruz. It was more or less deprecated by rubygem-tins (but the rename was never officially announced) and it is not maintained anymore. The package is not used by anything ATM. Feel free to pick it up if you have some use for it (but there is one minor issue with file co

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: [ notes snipped, ] > You know, that systemd creates a symlink if the file is missing is not > going to change behaviour of anything, since it will only do something >

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora

On 02/26/2015 02:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: = Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform in Fedora = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora == Detailed Description == This is no real work proposal. Stepping back, I’m not sure this has been sai

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > Look, deciding to ignore the File System Hierarchy for installing > config files and creating new locations to store system configuration > is part of what killed the old "daemontools" init system replacement. > tool. You and the other d

Re: SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

I'm not sure if it will be a problem or not but FreeCAD 0.15 will require Coin3 and as far as I know will still require python-pivy which is currently built against Coin2. Thoughts? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: [Scitech] OpenBabel rebase to pre-2.4 (current Git master)

On Friday, 27 February 2015 at 11:51, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Do we need to tell upstream about these patches? Yes, it's part of maintainer responsibilities. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Del

Re: SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

On 02/27/2015 02:56 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: I'm not sure if it will be a problem or not but FreeCAD 0.15 will require Coin3 and as far as I know will still require python-pivy which is currently built against Coin2. OK, inbetween your lines, you are right, I missed pivy. This will also have to

Re: SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > However, FreeCAD-0.15 may impose problems on Fedora <= 21. > Therefore, I'd first raise a couple of problem: > > - Do you plan to upgrade FreeCAD to 0.15 on Fedora <= 21? > I would like to, especially for F21 as it still has a lot of "li

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On 02/27/2015 01:18 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: [ notes snipped, ] >You know, that systemd creates a symlink if the file is missing is not >going to change beh

Re: systemd-219 issues with 22 and Rawhide composes

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 08:18:12AM -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Mon, 23.02.15 08:45, Nico Kadel-Garcia (nka...@gmail.com) wrote: > > [ notes snipped, ] > > > You know, that systemd creates a symlink if the file is missing

Re: Fedora 22 Alpha Freeze

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Today is also the Alpha freeze[4]. This means that only packages which > fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[5][6] will be marked as > 'stable' and included in the Alpha composes. Other builds will remain > in updates-testing unt

Re: Fedora 22 Alpha Freeze

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> >> Today is also the Alpha freeze[4]. This means that only packages which >> fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[5][6] will be marked as >> 'stable' and included in the Alp

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 27 February 2015 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

On 26.02.2015 13:02, Harald Hoyer wrote: > Agenda: > - Interview candidates for new memberships > - Optionally accept new members > - Vote for new chairman of the Base Design WG to replace Phil Knirsch > - Open Floor > > Please add items by replying to this mail. > Minutes:

Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

Hi, following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat. I'm leading RHEV integration team and I'm oVirt[2] project release manager. I'm also representing oVirt project in CentOS Virt SIG[3]. In the past I contributed to severa

Re: GCC5 rebuilds required for sflphone: ccrtp, libzrtpcpp, dbus-c++

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:52:42PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 01:36:31PM +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need ccrtp, libzrtpcpp > Building those two now. > > > and dbus-c++ to be rebuilt against GCC5 to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?

Re: SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > - As mentioned before, I want to understand the reasons why FreeCAD seems > to insist on Coin3. As of version 0.15 (or in the current master) they started using SoRenderManager which they're using for a Quarter based viewer. Thanks, Rich

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Sandro Bonazzola

2015-02-27 13:02 GMT-03:00 Sandro Bonazzola : > Hi, Hello and Welcome Sandro! > following [1] I'm writing for introducing myself. > My name is Sandro Bonazzola and I'm a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat. > I'm leading RHEV integration team and I'm oVirt[2] project release manager. > I'm also

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >>> Why not to create a new repository with reduced policy as > >>> Stephen proposed with the one-way dependency rule (bet

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 12:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > >> On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> >>> Why not to create a new repository with reduced polic

Re: SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

On 02/27/2015 06:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Ralf Corsepius mailto:rc040...@freenet.de>> wrote: - As mentioned before, I want to understand the reasons why FreeCAD seems to insist on Coin3. As of version 0.15 (or in the current master) they started using

Re: SIMVoleon, SoQt rebuilt against Coin3 on f22 and rawhide

Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 02/27/2015 06:06 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Ralf Corsepius > > wrote: >> >> - As mentioned before, I want to understand the reasons why FreeCAD >> seems to insist on C

Re: [Proposal] Ring-based Packaging Policies

On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 18:32 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 18:13:23 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > On 02/17/2015 05:59 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 05:39:48PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > > > Why not to create a new repository with reduced

Re: i686 kernel bug priority plan

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 10:35:22 -0500 Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 14:01 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > This is an opportunity for community members for whom i686 is a > > > > passion to join the team to participate in the bug

Re: Hardened builds

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 05:44:18PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: > Also, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hardened_Packages seems to be > entirely useless at this point. Perhaps it could be replaced with a > page that discusses the current state of the hardening flags. I am going to get this updated on

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 7 (TC7) Available Now!

As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Alpha Test Compose 7 (TC7) is now available for testing. Note a significant known bug in TC7: Workstation live image boot will often hang at the point where X should start up. This can be worked around by just booting a few times (sometimes it works.

Re: qt3 rebuild in f23?

Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > pdfedit depends on qt3 and fails to link in f23: OK, qt3 f23 (re)build queue'd, https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9095361 -- rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora

Re: Fedora 22 Alpha Freeze

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 8:50 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Dave Johansen > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Dennis Gilmore > wrote: > >> > >> Today is also the Alpha freeze[4]. This means that only packages which > >> fix accepted blocker or freeze exc

[Test-Announce] 2015-03-02 @ 1700 UTC ** Fedora 22 Blocker Review Meeting

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-02 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Another week and a couple TCs later, it's time for some blocker review goodness! Also, as an added bonus, Alpha Freeze is upon us so we get to look over FE bugs as well. Currentl

Re: Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?

> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> On 02/25/2015 03:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel? >> >> The kernel itself isn't limited. It's ju

Re: Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?

On 02/27/2015 06:14 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: Except, of course, that it is apparently Leonard Pottering's announced desire to stop people from using /etc/ No, it's not. Why do people insist on misinterpreting him? He wants it to be possible to have a read-only / (including /etc), so *dy

Re: Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel?

Am 28.02.2015 um 03:14 schrieb Nico Kadel-Garcia: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: On 02/25/2015 03:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Ali AlipourR wrote: Hi, Why sysrq is limited to only "sync" command on official fedora kernel? The kernel its

Re: koji is broken

I still met Could not execute build: [('SSL routines', 'SSL3_WRITE_BYTES', 'ssl handshake failure')] this morning (2 hrs ago). -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedor