hibernation support - lack of distro-wide coordination between systemd, dracut, anaconda, pm-utils and maybe more?

Hi, it seems to be that me have a major problem of core package maintainers coordinating features in Fedora. See for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174945 There the problem is, that dracut runs a fsck check before deciding whether to resume. This can result in a big file s

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2015-03-30 Fedora QA Meeting

Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel tomorrow's QA meeting; there's lots going on, but I think we're all more or less on the same page - Beta TC6 should happen pretty soon and we can carry on getting all the testing done. We'll be having the blocker review meeting at 1600, so we can sync up on Bet

RE: Copr too slow !!!

Thank You https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4699 Mosaab Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:13:12 -0600 From: ke...@scrye.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Copr too slow !!! On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:37:23 +0200 مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > Results: >

Re: sundials updated - bionetgen and ascend depend on it

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/29/2015 05:55 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > * bionetgen fails to build from source > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9361549 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206950 > False alarm. This builds fine. sc

Re: Koji build failure: noarch vs. arch?

Sorry, upon closer review doesn't look like that quite matches. Couldn't find a bug... if someone knows of one, please let me know, otherwise I'll create one. I used the workaround, and that worked fine btw; but doesn't seem like it should be the solution. Thanks! On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:32 P

[Test-Announce] 2015-03-30 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora 22 Blocker Review

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-03-30 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Well, this email is going out a bit late, but I'm sure you all know it's that time of the week again! We've had a few more proposals since our meeting last week. We currently hav

Re: Koji build failure: noarch vs. arch?

I found the bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141513 On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:02 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:44 PM, gil wrote: > >> a fix for this problem is: >> (see >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wr

Re: Copr too slow !!!

On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:37:23 +0200 مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > Results: > > No results yet > > > Built packages: ...snip... 1. So, the proper place to report issues with an infrastructure service is by filing a

Re: Koji build failure: noarch vs. arch?

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:44 PM, gil wrote: > a fix for this problem is: > (see > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/java-service-wrapper.git/tree/java-service-wrapper.spec > > ) > # rpmbuild < 4.6 support > %if ! 0%{?__isa_bits} > %ifarch x86_64 ia64 ppc64 sparc64 s390x alpha ppc64le aarch64 > %

Copr too slow !!!

Results: No results yet Built packages: - Chroots:

sundials updated - bionetgen and ascend depend on it

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Greetings, I have updated the package sundials to the latest upstream version (2.6.0) on rawhide (only) today. repoquery indicates bionetgen (zbyszek) and ascend (sagitter) depend on sundials. $ repoquery --whatrequires sundials ascend-libs-0:0.9

F-22 Branched report: 20150329 changes

Compose started at Sun Mar 29 07:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6