Re: F23 System Wide Change: Perl 5.22

Dne 28.4.2015 v 21:50 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.22 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.22 > > Change owner(s): Jitka Plesníková , Petr Písař > > > A new perl 5.22 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of > development. Perl 5.22 should b

Can't give package to another developer

I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer, but the online tool keeps saying that "User is not in the packager group", which I believe is not true, because he is in the same Fedora groups as I am. Where can I report this? Cheers, -- Jan Synacek Software Engineer, Red Ha

Re: F23 System Wide Change: Perl 5.22

On 04/29/2015 10:39 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.4.2015 v 21:50 Jan Kurik napsal(a): = Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.22 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.22 Change owner(s): Jitka Plesníková , Petr Písař A new perl 5.22 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of

Re: Can't give package to another developer

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:52:09AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer, > but the online tool keeps saying that "User is not in the packager > group", which I believe is not true, because he is in the same Fedora > groups as I am. Where

Re: Can't give package to another developer

On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:52:09 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer, > but the online tool keeps saying that "User is not in the packager > group", which I believe is not true, because he is in the same Fedora > groups as I am. Where can I

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree

Peter Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson > wrote: > > Kalev Lember wrote: > >>Package (co)maintainers > >> > >> aunit landgraf > >> aws landgraf > >> flor

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 11:15 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Björn Persson >> wrote: >> > Kalev Lember wrote: >> >>Package (co)maintainers >> >> >> >> aunit

Orphaning ovirt-node

Hey, I'll orphan ovirt-node because it is of no real use inside Fedora. This package is related to the [oVirt Project](http://www.ovirt.org) and should not be used on regular hosts as it is intended to be used on an appliance. Greetings fabian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't give package to another developer

Michael Schwendt writes: > On Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:52:09 +0200, Jan Synacek wrote: > >> I'm trying to give one of my packages (openldap) to another developer, >> but the online tool keeps saying that "User is not in the packager >> group", which I believe is not true, because he is in the same Fed

Re: [Bug 1201978] dracut assumes BIOS time is UTC closed without fixing again

On 04/28/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: And no, this *never* worked fully on Linux, and it never will, sorry. But it worked sufficentily most of the time ... ever since! The current situation means, - Fedora does not support multiboot'ing at all, - Fedora is preferring to be militan

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree

>> > Kalev Lember wrote: >> >>Package (co)maintainers >> >> >> >> aunit landgraf >> >> aws landgraf >> >> florist landgraf >> >> gnatcolllandgraf >> >> ma

Re: [Bug 1201978] dracut assumes BIOS time is UTC closed without fixing again

On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:00 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 04/28/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > And no, this *never* worked fully on Linux, and it never will, > > sorry. > > But it worked sufficentily most of the time ... ever since! > > The current situation means, > - Fedor

Re: [Bug 1201978] dracut assumes BIOS time is UTC closed without fixing again

On Wed, 29.04.15 16:46, Lubomir Rintel (lkund...@v3.sk) wrote: > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:00 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > On 04/28/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > And no, this *never* worked fully on Linux, and it never will, > > > sorry. > > > > But it worked sufficentil

F-22 Branched report: 20150429 changes

Compose started at Wed Apr 29 07:15:02 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6

Re: [Bug 1201978] dracut assumes BIOS time is UTC closed without fixing again

On 04/29/2015 11:14 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Wed, 29.04.15 16:46, Lubomir Rintel (lkund...@v3.sk) wrote: On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:00 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 04/28/2015 03:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: And no, this *never* worked fully on Linux, and it never will, sorry. B

Re: [Bug 1201978] dracut assumes BIOS time is UTC closed without fixing again

On Wed, 29.04.15 11:48, Przemek Klosowski (przemek.klosow...@nist.gov) wrote: > I agree that it's not possible to make this work under every circumstance, > but a compromise existed that worked well enough so that most people were > not complaining. I propose that a system that possibly hiccups ev

Re: Packaging rust-lang

On 04/27/2015 02:35 AM, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > Hey, > > there is some interest (the interested people are BCC'ed) in packaging > [Rust](http://www.rust-lang.org). > The packaging request is tracked here: Bug 915043 - Package rust (lang) > > There are two main parts to get the packaging done: > (

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-04-30 16:00 UTC) Followups: 5

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-04-30 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-04-30 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2015-04-30 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2015-04-30 1

[Test-Announce] Fedora 22 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!

As per the Fedora 22 schedule [1], Fedora 22 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. Please help us complete as much of the validation testing as we can! Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6166 . Please see the followin

Orphaning 'nss_compat_ossl'

Everyone, As we believe that the only project that may have been using 'nss_compat_ossl' was the 'elinks' project, and they are abandoning its use (see elinks-0.12-0.44.pre6.fc23 ), I am announcing that I am orphaning the 'nss_compa

Non-responsive Maintainer - itamarjp

Does anyone know how to contact itamarjp? I've been trying to contact him through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in ytnef that's been open for going on five years. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632537 Thanks. --Eric signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed me

Non-responsive Maintainer - skottler

Does anyone know how to contact skottler? I've been trying to contact him through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in nagios-plugins that's been open for going on a year. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098548 Thanks. --Eric signature.asc Description: This is a digitally sig

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer - skottler

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 09:13:36PM -0400, Eric Christensen wrote: > Does anyone know how to contact skottler? I've been trying to contact him > through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in nagios-plugins that's been open > for > going on a year. > [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1

convert program from ImageMagick broken in rawhide?

I was doing a test build of zipios++ for rawhide in mock and when the build for the documentation was attempted I got an interesting (if unhelpful) error. It looks like the make doc target uses convert for part of the documentation: + make V=1 doc convert doc/images/zipios++.jpg doc/images/zipios

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer - itamarjp

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Eric Christensen wrote: > Does anyone know how to contact itamarjp? I've been trying to contact him > through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in ytnef that's been open for > going on > five years. > I've seen him on Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/itamarjp

Re: Non-responsive Maintainer - itamarjp

On Apr 29, 2015 20:45, "Eric Christensen" wrote: > > Does anyone know how to contact itamarjp? I've been trying to contact him > through BZ[0] regarding a security flaw in ytnef that's been open for going on > five years. > > [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632537 > > Thanks. > >