On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> By the way, I am not a maintainer of rubygem-rugged, either, and
> I don't use rubygem-rugged (currently). Anyway I want to know
> how the current maintainer think of the current status.
> If the current maintainer has no interest on this pack
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 5:09 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> libpuma: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651125
This package isn't ready for GCC 5.x in general. I've made a few
half-hearted attempts to fix the problem, but haven't found the right
solution yet. I need to ask upst
Planned Outage: Storage migration - 2015-05-05 23:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-05-05 23:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 3 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2015-05-05 23:
c22
And here's the list of unfixed packages based on today's branched
report; affected package maintainers are BCCd. Details are available in
20150504 F-22 Branched report at
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-May/210374.html
Package
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 10:39 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
>> > OK, here we go:
>> > · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
>> > · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
>> > · another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 11517
Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> > OK, here we go:
> > · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
> > · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
> > · another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 1151793
> > · one fix to GPRbuild that is needed before Matreshka c
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Ville-Pekka Vainio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had less time to work on Fedora packages this year than usually. A
> bug filed against gpodder lately made me realize this and I would
> appreciate some help. I am not even the main maintainer, Jef Spaleta is,
> but I used t
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 13:24 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:00:31PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:23:24PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski
> > -Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > For majority of ro-at-boot setups, changing to rw would be the
> > > b
Hi,
I've had less time to work on Fedora packages this year than usually. A
bug filed against gpodder lately made me realize this and I would
appreciate some help. I am not even the main maintainer, Jef Spaleta is,
but I used to keep an eye on gpodder because I like it and use it myself.
The bug
On 05/04/2015 01:20 PM, Jaromir Capik wrote:
So, I guess the failure needs to be resolved first.
Hi,
Wine-mono maintainer here.
Upstream has fixed it and you can pull in their patch.
https://github.com/mono/mono/commit/16ee0252305fbd4f40ea39c3c4421dc7f103f8a0
Regards,
Michael
--
devel mail
Hello everone.
> From: "Stephen Gallagher"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2015 2:32:46 PM
> Subject: Re: F23 System Wide Change: Mono 4
>
> So I don't really see any problem with bootstrapping it once with
> monolite and then rebuilding it with itself, provided of co
> UEFI doesn't solve anything with the rtc-in-local stuff windows is
> doing there.
Sorry for being slow, but could you please explain this a bit more? I don't
want to nitpick this to death (I've just set Windows to use UTC and it seems to
work great), but I'm really interested in learning why U
2015-04-28 1:45 GMT+03:00 Kalev Lember :
> opensipsivaxer, peter
> python-sippypeter
Fixed both. Sorry for the delay.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fed
Compose started at Mon May 4 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6
On Mon, 04 May 2015 18:55:50 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> fixing the reasons for fedora-easy-karma timeouts most of the time would
> in general help for karma - i guess i am not the only one having
> updates-testing and sometimes koji-repos enabled and refuse to seek for
> the installed packag
On Mon, 04.05.15 13:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:00:31PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:23:24PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > > For majority of ro-at-boot setups, changing to rw would be the bes
On 04/05/15 18:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Dear list,
We need some urgent karma for fedora-review. The reason is that an
upcoming mock release breaks it unless this update is pushed [1].
So, karma would be very much appreciated for the current updates
Am 04.05.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Alec Leamas:
Dear list,
We need some urgent karma for fedora-review. The reason is that an
upcoming mock release breaks it unless this update is pushed [1].
So, karma would be very much appreciated for the current updates [2] and
[3] so we can resolve this mess.
Dear list,
We need some urgent karma for fedora-review. The reason is that an
upcoming mock release breaks it unless this update is pushed [1].
So, karma would be very much appreciated for the current updates [2] and
[3] so we can resolve this mess. If you need some testing done in return
it
Am 04.05.2015 um 17:00 schrieb Kamil Paral:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201979 is about systemd
being stupid and rerunning root fsck, which sometimes triggered the
first issue. I just posted a patch upstream:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/031445.ht
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201979 is about systemd
> > being stupid and rerunning root fsck, which sometimes triggered the
> > first issue. I just posted a patch upstream:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-May/031445.html
>
> Well, note that this on
On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> That built, update submitted, just gnatcoll and matreshka to go.
>
> OK, here we go:
> · one patch to Gnatcoll for GCC 5
> · one patch to Matreshka for GCC 5
> · another patch to build Matreshka in spite of bug 115179
Vít Ondruch wrote on 04/28/2015 11:52 PM:
Dne 28.4.2015 v 11:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
On 04/28/2015 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a):
rubygem-rugged tdawson
I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was
broken by un
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 01:09:23PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> openav-luppp: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9651313
Fixed.
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedora
Thanks Florian and Kamil.
I've updated the wiki page
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Nss_compat_ossl ) to warn developers
that this library should not be used.
- Ken
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 1:21 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote:
> On Thursday, April 30, 2015 10:27:50 Ken Dreyer wrote:
>> A day or two ago C
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 13:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> blobby:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9650723
Informed upstream. Hopefully will get a fix soon.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.asc
Descr
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
2 packages were orphaned
nss_compat_ossl [master] was orphaned by mharmsen
Source-level compatibility library for OpenSSL to NSS porting
https://admin.fedoraproject.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dne 4.5.2015 v 14:32 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 05:02 -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
> ...
>> * Make a one time exception of the rule for
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 12:00:31PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:23:24PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> > For majority of ro-at-boot setups, changing to rw would be the best and the
> > simplest
> > solution. I don't think we should do that automatically (e.g
Compose started at Mon May 4 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[Sprog]
Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0)
[aeskulap]
aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.i686 requires libofstd.so.3.6
aesku
On Mon, 2015-05-04 at 05:02 -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
...
> * Make a one time exception of the rule for build mono 4.0.1-1 using
> monolite, later make mono depend again on it self and rebuild mono
> 4.0.1-2 u
On Mon, 4 May 2015 05:02:29 -0400 (EDT)
Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
>
> Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
>
>
> Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 4.*
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> Support
mån 2015-05-04 klockan 13:09 +0200 skrev Kalev Lember:
> Hi all,
> PackageFailed koji task
> =
> gsoap: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9650970
This one is due to a regression in gcc:
https:
Hi all,
TL;DR: Rawhide C++ programs should be back to usable; a list of
remaining FTBFS packages down below.
Here's the long version:
As many of you have noticed, rawhide hasn't been lately as fun and well
working as it was during the F22 cycle, mainly due to the fact that C++
programs basically
El 2015-05-04 11:02, Jan Kurik escribió:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
Thanks for pushing forward this change.
A sponsor will be needed to help Claudio join the packagers group. This
pac
Am 28.04.2015 um 19:32 schrieb Reindl Harald:
i am not sure for which package file a bug
Waiting for Bodhi for a list of packages in updates-testing (F21)...
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/requests/packages/urllib3/util/ssl_.py:90:
InsecurePlatformWarning: A true SSLContext object is not avai
On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:23:24PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> For majority of ro-at-boot setups, changing to rw would be the best and the
> simplest
> solution. I don't think we should do that automatically (e.g. through rpm
> macro),
> but instead encourage people to switch man
On 04/30/2015 06:27 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> A day or two ago Ceph upstream was just discussing using this library
> to support for HTTPS support in its embedded Civetweb server.
> nss-compat-ossl is not in Debian/Ubuntu, but we could try to make that
> happen... this announcement catches me by surp
= Proposed System Wide Change: Mono 4 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Mono_4
Change owner(s): Claudio Rodrigo Pereyra Diaz
Update the Mono stack in Fedora from 2.10 to 4.*
== Detailed Description ==
Support for Mono versions 3.0 and 2.10 is been discontinued. No further
development o
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If y
41 matches
Mail list logo
