On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 11:18 +0200, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> I just upgraded to F22 and noticed, that mate-dialogs was uninstalled
> and cannot be reinstalled due to mate-desktop having an Obsoletes entry
> for it. The corresponding changelog entry is quite short:
>
> What was the reason for this? mat
WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston,
21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Fedora Docker images
- enhances: squashing, removing yum update
- https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels
- testing -- wh
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 02:26:03AM +0530, Parth Panchal wrote:
> I'm a GSoC student this year under Fedora. Now, I'm completely new to
> packaging but I'm willing to learn. Could you suggest me any package I
> can maintain?
If nothing on that list strikes your interest, you might try something
fro
On 09.06.2015 11:42, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> I just upgraded to F22 and noticed, that mate-dialogs was uninstalled
>> and cannot be reinstalled due to mate-desktop having an Obsoletes entry
>> for it. The corresponding changelog entry is quite short:
>>
>>> * Sat Jul 12 2014 Wolfgang Ulbrich -
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 13:30 -0600, ke...@scrye.com wrote:
> I've just orphaned packages owned by 'vicodan' as he has not been rea
> chable and his bugzilla account is not functional per fesco ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1448
>
> Please feel free to take on the point of contact
2015-06-17 21:30 GMT+02:00 Kevin Fenzi :
> I've just orphaned packages owned by 'vicodan' as he has not been
> reachable and his bugzilla account is not functional per fesco ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1448
> Please feel free to take on the point of contact for any of these
> p
I've just orphaned packages owned by 'vicodan' as he has not been
reachable and his bugzilla account is not functional per fesco ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1448
Please feel free to take on the point of contact for any of these
packages if you wish:
BitchX (el5) to 'orphan' h
Greetings.
In today's FESCo meeting we had a lot of discussion about this change.
You can read the meeting yourself in:
http://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-06-17/fesco.2015-06-17-18.00.log.html#l-109
Speaking only for myself here:
I am very happy we are moving more thin
On 17.06.2015 16:22, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>
> >> While I don't actually care, this might well be a sticking point for
> >> many people since their DNS information is going to an untrusted (to
> >> them) DNS server. Yeah, I tend to trust Fedora, but not ever
On 12 June 2015 at 21:32, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Friday, June 12, 2015 02:21:14 PM Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > On 06/12/2015 12:11 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > > On Thursday, June 11, 2015 08:36:38 AM Florian Weimer wrote:
> > >> On 05/21/2015 10:11 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > >>> The
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-06-18 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-06-18 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT
2015-06-18 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT
2015-06-18 1
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
> My projects copy around some code to recursively archive.
>
>
Thanks Colin, I'll take a look. I plan on documenting all the various
working methods that come up in this thread
and submitting them to FPC for their consideration.
I'll also
Hi,
On Qua, 2015-06-17 at 12:43 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015, at 10:33 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle the situation where
> > a project decides to use submodules in Git. The archive generated
> > doesn't incorporate the submod
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 9:16 AM, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
> Maybe this is a GitHub-specific problem. If the submodule files are not
> present in the archive, then archive cannot be intended to be used
>
I searched and found many people were complaining about it a few years
ago... and
I read a fe
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015, at 10:33 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle the situation where a
> project decides to use submodules in Git. The archive generated
> doesn't incorporate the submodule files.
My projects copy around some code to recursively archive.
h
On Wed, 2015-06-17 at 09:24 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> > I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle the situation where
> a
> > project decides to use submodules in Git. The archive generated
> doesn't
> > incorporate the submodule files.
Maybe this is a GitHub-specific problem. If the
On 06/17/2015 04:14 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
The Perl 5.22 mass rebuild broke po4a
I checked in a patch which hopefully fixes po4a, earlier today.
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230977)
It doesn't seem to be on the rawhide mirrors yet, but it's already in
Fedora's builders. So,
On Wed, 17 Jun 2015, Tomas Hozza wrote:
While I don't actually care, this might well be a sticking point for
many people since their DNS information is going to an untrusted (to
them) DNS server. Yeah, I tend to trust Fedora, but not everyone will.
If you don't trust fedora infrastructure, yo
Hi,
s/has break/broke/
The Perl 5.22 mass rebuild broke po4a
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Ter, 2015-06-16 at 22:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 04:00:03 PM Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
> > 23 very shortly. It was requested in a trac ticket[2]
> > that we do a mass re
- Original Message -
> From: "Kevin Fenzi"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 11:28:56 PM
> Subject: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-06-17)
>
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (
On 12.06.2015 18:58, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 10:58 +0200, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>> On 11.06.2015 22:48, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> decision needs to then b
On 12.06.2015 19:17, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 12:53 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> b) Broken networks:
>>> Some networks are so broken that even without captive portal they are not
>>> able
>>> to deliver DNSSEC data to the clients.
>>>
>>> In that case will try tunnel to other DNS servers
On 12.06.2015 19:00, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:53:32AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Yeah, we did. From my recollection, most of that focused on the unbound
>> parts and how NM could add the dns=unbound stuff (which Pavel
>> contributed) but less on the NM connectivity che
On 12.06.2015 18:53, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 17:10 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 12:30 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 11:34:39AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> decision needs to then be made by the system. I believe that's been
On 12.06.2015 16:58, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2015, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> Another integration concern: the network config GUI (and ifcfg files,
>> for that matter) let me list specific DNS servers. With this
>> feature, are those used (and if so, how)? If not, is my configuration
>> Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
>> 23
>> very shortly. It was requested in a trac ticket[2]
>> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 23 for
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages
>>
Hi, Dennis.
On Tuesday, 16 June 2015 at 23:00, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
> 23
> very shortly. It was requested in a trac ticket[2]
> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 23 for
> https://fedoraproject.org/wi
- Original Message -
> From: "James Antill"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 9:16:27 PM
> Subject: Re: DNF vs YUM, $pkg, $pkg-mpi, $pkg-openmpi having same provides
>
> On Fri, 2015-06-12 at 15:09 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > On 06/1
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 16.6.2015 v 23:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
>> 23
>> very shortly.
>
> Will it be done using DNF of YUM?
yum. the changes aren't all in place
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been getting some failed build mails from the mass rebuild for
> F-23. I'm wondering how to fix these since the mass rebuild is happening
> inside a side-tag, do I just do a normal master build with the cause fixed,
> or shoul
Hi,
So I've been getting some failed build mails from the mass rebuild for
F-23. I'm wondering how to fix these since the mass rebuild is happening
inside a side-tag, do I just do a normal master build with the cause fixed,
or should I build into the side-tag ?
If the latter what is the command
On 13.06.2015 04:33, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out the best way to handle the situation where a
> project decides to use submodules in Git. The archive generated doesn't
> incorporate the submodule files.
>
> I've done some searching on this, and haven't really come up with muc
Dne 16.6.2015 v 23:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
> 23
> very shortly.
Will it be done using DNF of YUM?
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
dev
34 matches
Mail list logo
