https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240964
Bug ID: 1240964
Summary: Environment file not read on EL7
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: fusioninventory-agent
Assignee: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240971
Bug ID: 1240971
Summary: Please provide EPEL7 build
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel7
Component: perl-Perl-Critic
Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240862
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
From 580b570fcedee410e5a4814d61cab1d3f3ec5859 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:45:56 +0200
Subject: 0.54 bump
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index da5ebbd..aa3432e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3
perl-Devel-BeginLift has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-BeginLift-0.001003-9.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV-0.09-10.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240964
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||psab...@redhat.com
perl-Gtk3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl-Test-Vars has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Test-Vars-0.005-6.fc22.noarch
perl-Task-Catalyst has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Task-Catalyst-4.02-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Gtk3-WebKit-0.06-3.fc22.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-Devel-FindRef has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Devel-FindRef-1.44-3.fc22.i686
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.18-4.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Method-Signatures has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Method-Signatures-20141021-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-CatalystX-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CatalystX-REPL-0.04-10.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools has broken dependencies in the rawhide
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Structured-Tools-0.015-7.fc22.noarch requires
polymake has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires perl = 4:5.20.2
polymake-2.13-22.git20141013.fc23.x86_64 requires
perl-Test-Apocalypse has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On i386:
perl-Test-Apocalypse-1.006-1.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1)
On armhfp:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-Data-Dump-Streamer-2.38-3.fc22.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.x86_64 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
perl-Test-AutoBuild-1.2.4-15.fc22.i686 requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
perl-MongoDB has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.20()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-MongoDB-0.702.2-5.fc22.i686 requires
perl-Carp-REPL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On i386:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2)
On armhfp:
perl-Carp-REPL-0.18-1.fc23.noarch
perl-POE-API-Peek has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On i386:
1:perl-POE-API-Peek-2.20-8.fc22.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.0)
On armhfp:
Hello Perl hackers.
You could read
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/208954 about poor
implementation of Fedora 23 hardening feature.
It turned out that perl is broken too. Fortunately, only /usr/bin/perl is
broken. Not the libperl.so or any other XS modules. This issue
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Today the Bugzilla Project is extremely proud to announce the release
of Bugzilla 5.0, the most exciting new version of Bugzilla in our
history.
It has been slightly over two years since we released Bugzilla 4.4 in
May of 2013. This new major release comes with many new features and
On Tuesday 07 July 2015 23:44:03 Kevin Kofler wrote:
I am one of the comaintainers of the qtoctave package. I know the package is
dead upstream. But last I checked, it worked. (There had been some issues,
but I
fixed those that I found.) If it still works fine, I object to retiring it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240964
Kevin Cousin ke...@famillecousin.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Unspecified |x86_64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1240971
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
274261d3120813486c2a9756ddf6f304 Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz/md5/274261d3120813486c2a9756ddf6f304/Dist-Zilla-Plugin-GithubMeta-0.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 4:51 PM, José Matos jama...@fc.up.pt wrote:
Please note octave FAQ
http://wiki.octave.org/FAQ#Why_did_you_create_yet_another_GUI_instead_of_making_one_that_already_exists_better.3F
In this case the important thing is the last (and a half) paragraph:
Also, many bits
also I think the Boston box is on git master branch (of openqa_fedora
and openqa_fedora_tools), not develop, and I think is missing some of
the latest commits
Just a side-note - yes, Boston machine is running on master. I thought of it
as production machine. But it raises questions - should we
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Andrew Lutomirski l...@mit.edu wrote:
Hi-
I'm asking here because Fedora seems to one of few distros that
enables CONFIG_VM86 on 32-bit kernels.
I'm somewhat confused as to how that is to be honest. We don't
explicitly set it in our config hunks, and we
R has support for libcurl (= 7.28.0) since R version 3.2.0. This
feature allows the functions functions url() and download.file() to
access secure URLs. With the US government adopting an https-only policy
for federal websites and web services it is increasingly important to
offer secure download
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 16:20 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I'm asking here because Fedora seems to one of few distros that
enables CONFIG_VM86 on 32-bit kernels.
Would anyone object if the upstream kernel (and hence Fedora) removed
vm86 support? This would break 16-bit real mode programs
There's a neat GTK+ debugging thing called the GtkInspector which you
can launch from any GTK+ 3 app with shift+ctrl+D. From that you can
Or Ctrl+Shift+I, if you find that easier to remember (I as inspector) :-)
look at Properties then GtkSettings, and look at the gtk-xft-*
settings. I
Compose started at Wed Jul 8 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
WG meeting will be at 17:00 UTC (13:00 EST, 19:00 Brno, 13:00 Boston,
2:00+1d Tokyo, 3:00+1d Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode.
= Topics =
* Progress and goals for f23 and f24
(https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-May/000786.html)
* Open Floor
--
devel
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:48 AM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-07-07 at 16:20 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
I'm asking here because Fedora seems to one of few distros that
enables CONFIG_VM86 on 32-bit kernels.
Would anyone object if the upstream kernel (and hence Fedora)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-07-08 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-07-08 10:00 Wed US/Pacific PDT
2015-07-08 13:00 Wed US/Eastern EDT
2015-07-08
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-07-08)
===
Meeting started by paragan at 18:00:02 UTC. The full logs are available
athttp://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-07-08/fesco.2015-07-08-18.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
From 55e10150e4f52b000830f32902b1340568e4c01e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 10:58:48 -0600
Subject: fix bug #1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 7aeaff6..6ba152d 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7
From f7b7f95b13c6b023d6ad89c8480bc7ba0623fcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:09:20 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 2da7bb9..1898284 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7
From 0dcd4968a816832d1cef8877c37af3d2236e23af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:13:23 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 044909f..1fcea95 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7
From acc515038d63406dc3051f4c5a5c2c32c9647d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:12:17 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 66f37ab..6369769 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a
while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably
have a slow turn around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and
only
On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 09:19:46 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Germano Massullo wrote:
Il 30/06/2015 10:13, Richard W.M. Jones ha scritto:
Didn't even know it was happening. Where was it announced? Rich.
On
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892597
--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
glite-lb-types-2.0.10-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
From f7b7f95b13c6b023d6ad89c8480bc7ba0623fcd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathanael d. Noblet nathan...@noblet.ca
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:09:20 -0600
Subject: fix bug 1240913
diff --git a/dspam.spec b/dspam.spec
index 2da7bb9..1898284 100644
--- a/dspam.spec
+++ b/dspam.spec
@@ -12,7 +12,7
I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a while. I
would be willing to do a review swap but I would probably have a slow turn
around on my end (I'm currently on vacation and only occasionally get time
to do this sort of thing). So if you're willing to swap or do the review,
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1172
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
626
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
391
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
237
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
121
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087/dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
104
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1172
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
237
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1
88
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 08/07/15 20:02, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly?
Or am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not
finding qmake, but isn't everything supossed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/2015 09:23 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande
anto.tra...@gmail.com mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:15 AM, Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/08/2015 07:08 PM, Dave Johansen wrote:
I have two reviews that have been waiting for a reviewer for a
while. I would be willing to do a review swap but I
On 08/07/15 20:02, Dave Johansen wrote:
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly?
Or am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not
finding qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock?
The build is done in mock, but that spec is
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or
am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding
qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock?
Sorry for
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:30:40 +0200
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
...snip...
Protected multilib versions: polkit-0.113-1.fc21.x86_64 !=
polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686
This is due to polkit splitting out a polkit-libs package between those
two versions. This makes it only
Do anyone have time to sponsor me? I have three Java packages waiting
for formal review:
* hid4java: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949
* rescu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231457
* Java-WebSocket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231570
Sincerely
On 07/07/2015 03:12 AM, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello
I've got an initial implementation of this using the rpm dependency generator
hooks, as suggested in the other thread [1].
The resulting scripts are here: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/rpm-mpi-hooks/
There is just one problem: an elf
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48013
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48013/0001-Ticket-48013-Inconsistent-behaviour-of-DS-when-LDAP-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hello Jonny,
On 8 July 2015 at 20:56, Jonny Heggheim heg...@gmail.com wrote:
Do anyone have time to sponsor me? I have three Java packages waiting
for formal review:
* hid4java: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230949
* rescu: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231457
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 11:29 -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
It may not end up going away. I want to mark it BROKEN, which means
that basically everyone's config will disable it. The problem is that
it's buggy and probably full of security holes.
Certainly using it the way xserver needs to
-- Running transaction check
--- Package polkit-libs.x86_64 0:0.113-1.fc21 will be installed
--- Package udisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.3-4.fc21 will be updated
--- Package udisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.3-4.fc21 will be updated
--- Package udisks2.x86_64 0:2.1.6-1.fc21 will be an update
-- Processing Dependency:
On 08.07.2015 22:28, Orion Poplawski wrote:
It appears to be sufficient to define this macro anywhere, not just in
elf.attr. So I think it could be added in to a rpm macros file in
openmpi/mpich-devel.
Ah cool, actually it seems to also work if I add it directly to
mpi.attrs, meaning that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241301
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1050047
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1050047action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.009 (#1241301)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241301
Bug ID: 1241301
Summary: perl-App-a2p-1.009 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-App-a2p
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that
there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will
send in a separate announcement.
-
Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:,
etc.) have been added.
Here are the recent changes to the packaging guidelines. Note that
there is also a set of Python guideline changes pending which I will
send in a separate announcement.
-
Guidelines for making use of weak dependencies (Recommends:, Suggests:,
etc.) have been added.
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 5:49 PM, Dave Johansen davejohan...@gmail.com
wrote:
I can bulid a package on my machine (F21 32-bit), but when I try and build
it with mock, I get an error when trying to run python. Here's the output:
RPM build errors:
+ cd durin42-hgsubversion-dde1ade36a49
+
sheldon.co...@gmail.com sent you an invitation to join MEGA.\n\n;
--- Message from user: ---
Hello, join me on MEGA and get access to encrypted storage and
communication. Get 50 GB free!
---
Please create your free MEGA account by clicking on the following
link:\n\n;
On Qua, 2015-07-08 at 21:55 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
nightfall mmahut, astronomy-sig 60 weeks
ago
version available on Fedora : nightfall-1.62-15.fc20
version available upstream : nightfall-1.86.tar.gz
No wonder does not compile, but the package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10325727
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595
Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
I can bulid a package on my machine (F21 32-bit), but when I try and build
it with mock, I get an error when trying to run python. Here's the output:
RPM build errors:
+ cd durin42-hgsubversion-dde1ade36a49
+ '%{__python2}' setup.py build
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.N6A81W: line 31: fg: no job control
Any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595
--- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1050050
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1050050action=edit
[patch] Update to 1.15 (#1220595)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Created attachment 1050041
-- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1050041action=edit
[patch] Update to 0.161000 (#1221832)
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221832
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
From fda408bb0f724f59cd7f1d554bba49a5fc4567ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:22:15 -0500
Subject: Update to 1.15.
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2f87db2..e725c85 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -4,3 +4,4 @@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595
--- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
tibbs's perl-Parallel-ForkManager-1.15-1.fc23 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=667636
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220595
--- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10325755
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
a8e8705151523c3b01baa40c2f493e46 Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Parallel-ForkManager/Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz/md5/a8e8705151523c3b01baa40c2f493e46/Parallel-ForkManager-1.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241301
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org ---
Scratch build succeeded
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10325743
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
I'm trying to run fedora-review. Do I have something setup incorrectly? Or
am I doing something wrong? It keeps running into issue with not finding
qmake, but isn't everything supossed to be done in mock?
Here's the output from the process:
[dlj@JohansenDev ~]$ fedora-review -b 1231427
INFO:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 2:47 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth
tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com
wrote:
So this was discussed at today's FESCo meeting[1]. Basically, we're not
sure that it makes sense to have both interpreters
On 8 July 2015 at 19:46, James Antill ja...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-07-08 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-07-08 10:00 Wed US/Pacific
88 matches
Mail list logo
