# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-07-13
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again!
It may sound a bit boring, but I've got more or less the same agenda as
On 07/12/2015 10:38 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote:
> Git hangs and didnt complete ...
>
> http://i.imgur.com/TyQ8I3l.png
Without any specific error message it's hard to know what precisely is
causing the problem.
Could it be that your certificate is invalid? This has happened in the
past (for example,
Hi All
Git hangs and didnt complete ...
http://i.imgur.com/TyQ8I3l.png
Regards
Mosaab
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-co
# F22 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-07-13
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
With branch almost here (this Tuesday), and freeze a couple weeks after
that (2015-07-28), I think it's time we started getting back into
regular blocker review meetings. This we
Michael Schwendt writes:
> Over the last years I've talked to quite some people. Some simply find
> the package review process "too embarrassing", because the tickets are
> world-readable. Once they learn that the package they offer is full of
> mistakes, they consider it "public shaming" and
On Dom, 2015-07-12 at 22:02 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 08:05:07PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > Sorry just after send first patch, I made more 2 fixes
> > if you could also apply it , it was great .
> > This patch is the last one , if you could build nightfall also for f
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 08:05:07PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Sorry just after send first patch, I made more 2 fixes
> if you could also apply it , it was great .
> This patch is the last one , if you could build nightfall also for f22
> and f21 it was also nice .
Thank you. I updated Rawhide
On Sáb, 2015-07-11 at 21:15 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 07:22:25PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> > I am , anyway patch in attach , this app is based on gtk2 , I wonder if
>
> Thank you, I applied the patch and submitted a new build.
Sorry just after send first patch, I mad
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> One way to do this that is a varient on some other suggestions, is to have
> would be co-maintainers do re-reviews of packages they are interested in
> co-maintaining. Spec files can gain cruft or not be kept fully compliant
> with the la
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 22:38:38 +0100,
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
2) We now have the possibility of obtaining sponsorship through
co-maintaining packages, but that's somewhat low profile and less used
as a route to sponsorship (just an impression-I have no data on this).
I think this is wher
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 11:54:47 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 11 July 2015 at 16:09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:45:13 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> >> and I will probably also find that those
> >> packages have 'accepted' differentiation because no one want
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 12:04:01 +0200,
Michael Schwendt wrote:
Nowadays, I would likely shift the prerequisites to highlight the
importance of
- the "fedora-review" tool
- Mock, as needed by fedora-review and used by koji
- koji, the Fedora Build System
I started out as a user, and as ti
On 11 July 2015 at 16:09, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 11:45:13 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> and I will probably also find that those
>> packages have 'accepted' differentiation because no one wants to get
>> into a political fight over XYZ package ever again.
>
> And ho
On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 11:09:05 +,
opensou...@till.name wrote:
nethack-vulturesbruno 60 weeks ago
nethack-vultures is now rebuilt in rawhide, f22 and f21.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> My blunt suggestion: if that bothers you, then help clean out
>> the queue.
>
> No. That tiresome with NEEDINFO, urging submitters to respond, waiting
> several weeks before closing the ticket. And later getting blamed
Let them complain then...
Seriously though, if t
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:58:37 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I like to think of being a sponsor as an exciting opportunity to shepherd
> new contributors to fedora.
Quick approval of an account based on reviewing a single tiny package
is not an option for me anymore. I've done that before. I've been
Compose started at Sun Jul 12 05:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:ju
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:31:52 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today I happened to look at this page:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html
>>
>> from which I can see we have potentially on the order of 100 new
>> potential
Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Today I happened to look at this page:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEEDSPONSOR.html
>
> from which I can see we have potentially on the order of 100 new
> potential contributors to Fedora whose efforts we're missing out on
> due to a lack of spons
Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 09/07/15 12:39, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 21:30:40 +0200
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>> ...snip...
>>>
Protected multilib versions: polkit-0.113-1.fc21.x86_64 !=
polkit-0.112-7.fc21.1.i686
>>>
>>> This is due to polkit splitting out
On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 09:53:23 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> What I'm getting here is that you have a very clear aspirations and
> expectations of what activities a new contributor should be engaging
> in. The questions I think are interesting are:
>
> a) Are we making these expectations clear
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:40:11 -0700, Les Howell wrote:
> I talk about all this because when you have someone who is interested,
> and even motivated enough to get involved, where does one go to learn
> the accepted techniques and support systems as a total newbie to the
> process? Do you hav
Hi Michael,
On 11 July 2015 at 23:56, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> More interesting is: What has happened between 2012-09-20 and 2014-07-28?
> No comments, no version updates. ==> A lost opportunity to practice
> maintaining the package, and a lost opportunity to demonstrate your
> interest in the
23 matches
Mail list logo
