Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
For a while now it's been possible for desktops to have their own mime
info (which is great), but it seems we have also gotten rid of the
generic one, which causes some strange behavior:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243049
ie,
On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on
my machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock
but it did say that it was waiting on a process. So unless it broke
from an update last night / this morning
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48226
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48226/0001-Ticket-48226-In-MMR-double-free-coould-occur-under-s.patch
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48226/0002-Ticket-48226-CI-test-added-test-cases-for-ticket-482.patch
--
389-devel
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:05:40AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
When I looked into packaging, I found extensive documentation but
very few tutorial-style materials. I like the hands-on approach so I
wrote a 'user story' about packaging a simple project:
On 07/15/2015 04:07 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi
I am facing a bizarre f23-koji build breakdown:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10366596
The interesting part seems to be hidden in this file:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6598/10366598/checkout.log:
$
f32dddbc7969e766588bea578e30f915 Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.029.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-LWP-UserAgent/Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.029.tar.gz/md5/f32dddbc7969e766588bea578e30f915/Test-LWP-UserAgent-0.029.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Hi everybody,
we will do an update of SELinux userspace tools
to 2015-02-02 release and selinux-policy packages as it was proposed in
SELinux policy store migration Fedora system wide change [1].
What does it mean for you:
1. You use only Fedora default SELinux policy.
You shouldn't notice any
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|rawhide |23
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1199775 (harden-failure)
This commit already existed in another branch.
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-File-Slurp-Tiny.git/commit/?h=perl-File-Slurp-Tiny-0.004-1.fc24id=8d361648c82aae260cc713d2f33afd9c2224f5d1
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
From 8d361648c82aae260cc713d2f33afd9c2224f5d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:33:52 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.004
- New upstream release 0.004
- Add discouragement notice (File::Slurper is a better choice)
- Don't skip '.\n' and '..\n'
7575b81543281ea57cdb7e5eb3f73264 File-Slurp-Tiny-0.004.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-Slurp-Tiny/File-Slurp-Tiny-0.004.tar.gz/md5/7575b81543281ea57cdb7e5eb3f73264/File-Slurp-Tiny-0.004.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 8d361648c82aae260cc713d2f33afd9c2224f5d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:33:52 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.004
- New upstream release 0.004
- Add discouragement notice (File::Slurper is a better choice)
- Don't skip '.\n' and '..\n'
From 8d361648c82aae260cc713d2f33afd9c2224f5d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:33:52 +0100
Subject: Update to 0.004
- New upstream release 0.004
- Add discouragement notice (File::Slurper is a better choice)
- Don't skip '.\n' and '..\n'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242802
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1199775 (harden-failure)
From 8d7b34dce51618866f7b0489bd86ea35ed8341a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:33:24 +0200
Subject: Initial import
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..f857542 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1242769, 1242802
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242769
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1238804
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242802
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1238804
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242769
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1199775 (harden-failure)
Am Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:08:18 +
schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:47:14 -0600
From: Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: shared-mime-info and desktops
Message-ID:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243619
Xavier Bachelot xav...@bachelot.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj |
Compose started at Thu Jul 16 07:15:03 UTC 2015
New package: java-hll-1.6.0-1.fc23
Java library for the HyperLogLog algorithm
New package: nghttp2-1.1.1-1.fc23
Experimental HTTP/2 client, server and proxy
New package: osmpbf-1.3.3-5.20150712git17fd0cc.fc23
From 39772c4d5d66035cddd9cbed1bfda74405daffd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:03:43 +0200
Subject: Specify all dependencies
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Untaint.spec b/perl-CGI-Untaint.spec
index d25340f..9f531c5 100644
---
From 39772c4d5d66035cddd9cbed1bfda74405daffd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:03:43 +0200
Subject: Specify all dependencies
diff --git a/perl-CGI-Untaint.spec b/perl-CGI-Untaint.spec
index d25340f..9f531c5 100644
---
- Original Message -
Greetings.
For a while now it's been possible for desktops to have their own mime
info (which is great), but it seems we have also gotten rid of the
generic one, which causes some strange behavior:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243049
ie,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||947022
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
Pavel Raiskup prais...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On|947022 |
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243855
Bug ID: 1243855
Summary: perl-Math-BaseCnv-1.8.B59BrZX-12.fc24 FTBFS:
undeclared dependency on
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Math-BaseCnv
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243862
Bug ID: 1243862
Summary: perl-Test-Routine-0.020-4.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared
dependency on Math::Trig
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Test-Routine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243871
Bug ID: 1243871
Summary: perl-Net-SNMP-6.0.1-13.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared
dependency on Math::BigInt
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Net-SNMP
Assignee:
There's already plenty of console ROM types in shared-mime-info.
To add more, please make sure to contribute the new items upstream, following
the HACKING file in the shared-mime-info git repository.
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
hi
I'm in
From 2d1bb723ca663877160d953cb029a042aa21414c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:57:32 +0200
Subject: Specify all dependencies
diff --git a/perl-Math-Base85.spec b/perl-Math-Base85.spec
index 5dc04b1..8a79d6f 100644
---
From 2d1bb723ca663877160d953cb029a042aa21414c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:57:32 +0200
Subject: Specify all dependencies
diff --git a/perl-Math-Base85.spec b/perl-Math-Base85.spec
index 5dc04b1..8a79d6f 100644
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243863
Bug ID: 1243863
Summary: perl-Crypt-X509-0.51-5.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared
dependency on Math::BigInt
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Crypt-X509
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243849
Bug ID: 1243849
Summary: perl-Convert-PEM-0.08-17.fc24 FTBFS: Undeclared
dependency on Math::BigInt
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Convert-PEM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243858
Bug ID: 1243858
Summary: perl-VOMS-Lite-0.20-5.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared
dependency on Math::BigInt
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-VOMS-Lite
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243867
Bug ID: 1243867
Summary: perl-Panotools-Script-0.28-5.fc24 FTBFS: undeclared
dependency on Math::Trig
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: perl-Panotools-Script
Hi folks,
I would like to share my experience with multiple monitors.
I have installed Fedora 22.
Nowadays I have ThinkPad T430 notebook and dockstation where are joined
two external LCD monitors.
First problem:
If I insert notebook to docking station then after entering crypt
password
From 954d872b2d4939afe3bfe2c59e5370366ff1cdcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:58:49 +0200
Subject: Add perl(Math::Trig) as a BR and clean-up
diff --git a/Test-Routine-0.015-Test-Simple-0.98_05-outputs-subtest-names.patch
From 805ffa5a33ade3d46464dee9b9ec348a40684de8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:01:37 +0200
Subject: Rewrite the dep list and fix the FTBFS (#1243849)
- Modernize the spec somewhat
diff --git a/perl-Convert-PEM.spec
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 03:18:01 -0400 (EDT)
Kamil Paral kpa...@redhat.com wrote:
I've been working towards migrating qadevel out of the current cloud
setup for a while now and I'd like to finish that migration before
we get too far into F23 testing.
The current plan is to do the migration
From 4bfb6f9c932f31e091ebe14cd779cdb474850c19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:28:27 +0200
Subject: Disable hardening due to some run-time failures
This is a temporary hack until we find the real cause. /usr/bin/perl
- Original Message -
From: Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com
To: EPEL Development List epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, Discussion
of RPM packaging standards and
practices for Fedora packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org, Fedora Python SIG
python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org,
From 805ffa5a33ade3d46464dee9b9ec348a40684de8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?= con...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:01:37 +0200
Subject: Rewrite the dep list and fix the FTBFS (#1243849)
- Modernize the spec somewhat
diff --git a/perl-Convert-PEM.spec
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 05:02:42PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 02:25:11PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote:
You could read
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel/208954 about
poor implementation of Fedora 23 hardening feature.
It turned out that perl is
From 4bfb6f9c932f31e091ebe14cd779cdb474850c19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:28:27 +0200
Subject: Disable hardening due to some run-time failures
This is a temporary hack until we find the real cause. /usr/bin/perl
I can't tell you anything about your first problem, but the second one
sounds similar to this one (last paragraph):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225629#c0
Have you tried switching VTs to the one hosting the previous session?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Hardening disabled in:
perl-5.22.0-349.fc23
perl-5.22.0-349.fc24
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
I remember frequently (to my dismay) getting messages from yum saying that
another process had a lock on the RPM database.
Due to a recent rash of issues with the akmods package I have been
investigating why the kmods are not getting installed.
Out of curiosity I tried running two dnf update
I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my
machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it
did say that it was waiting on a process. So unless it broke from an update
last night / this morning then idk
On Jul 16, 2015 11:20 AM, Richard Shaw
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1238804
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com ---
Known failures:
smartmatch-engine-core: tests segfaul on x86_64
perl-Algorithm-CurveFit: tests fails in this pure Perl code
perl-B-Utils: tests fail on x86
perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot: tests
From 6b1eccd4e06cea687625ba27dea372ab98cd2d2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:58:49 +0200
Subject: Add perl(Math::Trig) as a BR and clean-up
diff --git a/Test-Routine-0.015-Test-Simple-0.98_05-outputs-subtest-names.patch
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Przemek Klosowski
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote:
On 07/16/2015 01:19 PM, Eric Griffith wrote:
I tried to do an install and an update on two different terminals on my
machine yesterday. The second one didn't yell about an rpmdb lock but it did
say that it
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:04:12PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:53:31 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:53:31 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} anachronistic (*), and much prefer the
fedpkg / distgit
On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} anachronistic (*), and much prefer the
fedpkg / distgit approach of having
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES}
On 07/16/2015 12:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I
On Tuesday, July 14, 2015 01:11:53 PM Bruno Wolff III wrote:
This is being post to remixes, test and devel since people on test and devel
may not ordinarily be involved with remixes, but might want to comment.
Replies have been pointed back to the remixes list (hopefully won't be
munged) and
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPSCo weekly meeting on 2015-07-17 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
At e...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2542/
___
epel-devel
On 07/16/2015 07:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES} anachronistic (*), and much prefer the
fedpkg / distgit approach of having
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
246
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3989/cross-binutils-2.23.88.0.1-2.el7.1
130
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087/dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
113
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1181
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
246
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-4008/cross-binutils-2.23.51.0.3-1.el6.1
97
On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 08:22:36 +0200
Jakub Jelen jje...@redhat.com wrote:
It happened to me yesterday also during updates. Usually first and
the second attempt failed and then it succeed so I managed to push
all updates I wanted during day. Is the cause know at the moment?
Yes, it was a selinux
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
1181
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
635
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
400
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 02:12:37PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/16/2015 12:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 07/16/2015 11:53 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when
From 4196f57ccfee2749fd83f9a3602f24d6b60a510f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bruno Postle br...@postle.net
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:58:01 +0100
Subject: Fix for Bug #1243867
diff --git a/perl-Panotools-Script.spec b/perl-Panotools-Script.spec
index fea8c0d..268b075 100644
---
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 12:28:04AM +0200, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On 07/16/2015 07:53 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
One thing which I find very annoying when creating new packages is the
need to use bare rpmbuild commands. I find the split between
~/rpmbuild/{SPECS,SOURCES}
Compose started at Thu Jul 16 17:00:04 UTC 2015
New package: felix-scr-1.6.2-3.fc24
Apache Felix Declarative Services Runtime
New package: go-srpm-macros-1-1.fc24
RPM macros for building Golang packages for various architectures
New package: java-hll-1.6.0-1.fc24
71 matches
Mail list logo
