No CMap files in fontconfig.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 2:51 PM, wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Interesting, I wasn't aware of these being packaged separately... mind
>> collaborating to integrate this into poppler-data (which also contains a
>> copy of most/all
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Interesting, I wasn't aware of these being packaged separately... mind
> collaborating to integrate this into poppler-data (which also contains a
> copy of most/all of these)?
IIRC it is also duplicated in fontconfig
--
devel mailing list
d
On 9 Sep 2015 4:07 am, "Ben Rosser" wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> Ben Rosser wrote:
>>
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > I am not certain if any packages other than my python-pdfminer are
>> > currently using my packages of the Adobe CMap resources (
>> > https:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Ben Rosser wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am not certain if any packages other than my python-pdfminer are
> > currently using my packages of the Adobe CMap resources (
> > https://github.com/adobe-type-tools/cmap-resources), but--
> >
> >
Ben Rosser wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am not certain if any packages other than my python-pdfminer are
> currently using my packages of the Adobe CMap resources (
> https://github.com/adobe-type-tools/cmap-resources), but--
>
> The package versions have changed when the upstream repository was
Il 08/09/2015 06:54, Michel Alexandre Salim ha scritto:
The 14 day period is only for critical path packages though. This is odd.
-
Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi
I could be wrong but these are not updates that may have requirements
which you mentioned
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/
OCaml is a statically-safe programming language derived from ML which
compiles to very fast native code. It contains native code backends
for most architectures (all Fedora primary & secondary arches except
s/390x in fact).
Currently Fedora downstream carries two non-upstream backends:
For ppc64
Hi everyone,
I am not certain if any packages other than my python-pdfminer are
currently using my packages of the Adobe CMap resources (
https://github.com/adobe-type-tools/cmap-resources), but--
The package versions have changed when the upstream repository was moved
from Sourceforge to github
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6218#comment:9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248100
--
Regards, Irina.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud base Disk i386
Kde Disk armhfp
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150907
Images in 23 Branched 20150907 but not this:
Cloud base Disk i386
Failed openQA tests: 10 of 18
ID: 1766Test: x86
Missing expected images:
Kde Live i386
Workstation Live i386
Cloud base Disk i386
Cloud base Disk x86_64
Kde Live x86_64
Cloud atomic Disk x86_64
Kde Disk armhfp
Workstation Live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150907
Images in Rawhide 20150907 but not this:
Security Live x86
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their em
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not int
Jerry James writes:
> I tried this morning and tonight to push this update to stable:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14375
>
> Both times, bodhi told me that this update has not yet met the minimum
> testing requirements defined in the Package Update Acceptance Criteria.
On 08/09/15 17:29 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
I can see in your spec file you use %global. I couldn't find any entry
in the Fedora documentation about rpmbuild.
My issue is a variable environment one. If I source manually the two
scripts, build goes well. When sourcing from the spec file, it fai
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 5:04 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jonathan Underwood
> wrote:
>> I see what you're trying to do is build a package using the intel
>> compiler suite rather than the usual gcc toolchain.
> Exactly. And this is not an easy affair, especially as
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Jonathan Underwood
wrote:
> I see what you're trying to do is build a package using the intel
> compiler suite rather than the usual gcc toolchain.
Exactly. And this is not an easy affair, especially as it is my first
rpmbuild. I can build the package from source wi
I see what you're trying to do is build a package using the intel
compiler suite rather than the usual gcc toolchain. A few years ago I
needed to do that for packaging molpro locally, so I am attaching that
spec file which may give you some hints on how to go about it. Bare in
mind that I haven't t
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> These fail to compose because Bodhi 2 failed in the middle of the
>> push of: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-14271
>> and sent parts of the update to stable, parts not. As a result, the
>> whole KF5 stack has broken dependencies.
>
> I'm not sure how you
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/09/15 14:11 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Arnaud,
>>>
>>> I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in
>>> %build
>>> section. Can you be mo
Thanks Mat!
I was able to touch base with Keiran on IRC...
Affix
I will be updating the package in a few days
been a bit hard pressed with work issues recently
swilkerson
Ok, great! Let me know if you need any help.
Affix
will do thanks for pointing it out
Scott Wilkerson
On 08/09/15 14:11 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
Hi Arnaud,
I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in %build
section. Can you be more specific which commands are you running? %build
section is interpreted as a bash
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:11 PM, arnaud gaboury wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
>> Hi Arnaud,
>>
>> I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in %build
>> section. Can you be more specific which commands are you running? %build
>> section is i
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
> Hi Arnaud,
>
> I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in %build
> section. Can you be more specific which commands are you running? %build
> section is interpreted as a bash script so source and unset should work.
>
On 08/09/15 12:15, Jan Chaloupka wrote:
I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in
%build section. Can you be more specific which commands are you running?
%build section is interpreted as a bash script so source and unset
should work. Without the concrete example it i
Compose started at Tue Sep 8 07:15:04 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[ScientificPython]
ScientificPython-2.8-20.fc22.armv7hl requires libmpi.so.1
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.jud
Compose started at Tue Sep 8 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
[ScientificPython]
Hi Arnaud,
I am assuming all scripts you are referring to are sourced and run in
%build section. Can you be more specific which commands are you running?
%build section is interpreted as a bash script so source and unset
should work. Without the concrete example it is hard to guess what is
go
I am building a rpm package. For make to success and have the correct
env variables, I need to source a few scripts and unset a few
variables.
rpmbuild does not understand the source and unset commands.
How shall I proceed to get the desired variables?
Thank you
--
google.com/+arnaudgabourygab
On 4 September 2015 at 19:26, Scott Wilkerson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've been trying to get some old CVE's fixed in the nagios package and it
> appears to be falling on deaf ears
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958305
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1046333
> https://bug
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 10:04 AM, arnaud gaboury
wrote:
> First try at building a rpm package and as feared, errors are returned.
>
> Fedora 22
>
> I wrote my own .spec file based on this package[0]. My goal is to
> build R using Intel Compiler and MKL. The whole part of the spec file
> is untouche
First try at building a rpm package and as feared, errors are returned.
Fedora 22
I wrote my own .spec file based on this package[0]. My goal is to
build R using Intel Compiler and MKL. The whole part of the spec file
is untouched, except for the configure, variables and flag part.
At the begini
On Mon, 2015-09-07 at 21:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> As scheduled [1], Fedora 23 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4) is now
> available
> for testing. Please help us complete as much of the validation
> testing
> as we can!
>
> In case you're wondering what happened to TC2 and TC3, there were
> some
33 matches
Mail list logo
