Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:06 PM, Les Howell wrote: > Hi, everyone... > I have been trying for three days now to mount a galaxy phone to my F22 > system. > Problems: Phone does not mount. > Things checked: > 1. Nautilus does not have the side pane any longer. I re

Re: F23 broke dependencies

>> >> > [trustedqsl] >> >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.i686 requires tqsllib(x86-32) = >> >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23 >> >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.x86_64 requires tqsllib(x86-64) = >> >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23 >> > >> > >> > This is due to the fact that upstream puts both the application and libra

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 14:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > This isn't the right place to be asking this question. The users > list > or IRC would be better. > > On 09/24/2015 02:35 PM, Les Howell wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 14:07 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > > > > > > Check the logs when you p

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

On 21/09/15 03:00 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: >> Given that we are now post-Beta for F23, it seems a little late in the >> cycle to be introducing a new llvm runtime. Is it guaranteed to be >> backwards-compatible? > OTOH, having OpenGL 4 support in Fedora 23 (at least for certain cards) is a > strong

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On 24/09/15 01:06 PM, Les Howell wrote: > Hi, everyone... > I have been trying for three days now to mount a galaxy phone to my F22 > system. > Problems: Phone does not mount. > Things checked: > 1. Nautilus does not have the side pane any longer. I really > miss that

Re: F23 broke dependencies

On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 04:05:26 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> > [trustedqsl] > >> > tqsllib-devel-2.4-9.fc23.1.i686 requires tqsllib(x86-32) = > >> > 0:2.4-9.fc23 > >> >

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

hi I don't know if I can help you, but some android phones use mtp, so need the gvfs-mtp package to mount. Nautilus does have teh side pane, all you need to do is press f6 to access it. At least I think the side pane is the list of places, home, videos, etc, right? If it's been disabled, there's a

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

Kalev Lember wrote: > aws landgraf Here's a patch to include the missing library that prevents installation of aws-tools. To get it to build I had to disable PDF generation and build only HTML documents. There is a PDF file in the latest built package so it must have worked be

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

This isn't the right place to be asking this question. The users list or IRC would be better. On 09/24/2015 02:35 PM, Les Howell wrote: On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 14:07 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: Check the logs when you plug in the phone. Watch for lines from "org.gtk.vfs.Daemon". Run "journalc

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 14:07 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 09/24/2015 01:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Some newer cellphones aren't actually capable of acting as USB mass > > storage devices, they only support sync in a couple of other modes. > > MTP > > should work in Nautilus, but will not be

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On 09/24/2015 01:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Some newer cellphones aren't actually capable of acting as USB mass storage devices, they only support sync in a couple of other modes. MTP should work in Nautilus, but will not be visible in a terminal. Try setting the phone to MTP mode, then lookin

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 01:39:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Some newer cellphones aren't actually capable of acting as USB mass > storage devices, they only support sync in a couple of other modes. MTP > should work in Nautilus, but will not be visible in a terminal. Try > setting the phone

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Am 21.09.2015 um 11:07 schrieb Matthew Miller: > Fedora-Cloud-Base-20141203-21.x86_64.qcow2: 151M > Fedora-Cloud-Base-23_Beta-20150915.x86_64.qcow2: 275M > > In just one year — 82% more awesome? > > I'd really like this to stay below 200MB as a competitive threshold. > Or, if we're goin

Re: Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 13:06 -0700, Les Howell wrote: > Hi, everyone... > I have been trying for three days now to mount a galaxy phone to my > F22 > system.   > Problems:  Phone does not mount. > Things checked: > 1.  Nautilus does not have the side pane any longer.  I > r

Fedora 23 Branched 20150924 compose check report

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150923: Cloud disk raw i386 Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 Generic boot x86_64 Cloud disk qcow x86_64 Cloud docker x86_64 Generic boot i386 Cloud vagrant libvirt x86_64 Cloud vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic disk qcow x8

Mounting a Samsung S5 phone for reading

Hi, everyone... I have been trying for three days now to mount a galaxy phone to my F22 system. Problems: Phone does not mount. Things checked: 1. Nautilus does not have the side pane any longer. I really miss that because my file structure is very diverse.

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20150923 compose check report

On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 01:38:56 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 10:25 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > Missing expected images: > > > > Cloud disk raw i386 > > Cloud disk raw x86_64 > > Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 > > Generic boot i386 > > Generic boot x86_64 > > http

Fedora Rawhide 20150924 compose check report

No missing expected images. Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150923: Xfce disk raw armhfp Cloud docker x86_64 Games live x86_64 Games live i386 No images in Rawhide 20150923 but not this. -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-comp

Re: Applications missing from Fedora 23

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:28:44AM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > postbooks: specified icon '/usr/share/postbooks/images/icon128x32.png' > does not exist The png is in the rpm... What's going on here? Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

hi svnkit is only used for generate ${scmBranch}. should be easily removed from dependencies regards gil Il 24/09/2015 19:12, Christopher ha scritto: mimepull (maintained by: goldmann, gil) mimepull-1.9.5-2.fc23.src requires mvn(org.tmatesoft.svnkit:svnkit) = 1.8.5 -

Re: virtual provides/metapackage for various OpenCL implementations

On Thursday, 24 September 2015 at 14:44, Fabian Deutsch wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > wrote: > > Dear maintainers, > > I've just enabled OpenCL support in the gromacs package[1] and would > > like to express a weak dependency on an OpenCL implementatio

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Algorithm-Diff-XS (master) to 'Approved'

limb changed ppisar's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Algorithm-Diff-XS (master) to 'Approved' https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Algorithm-Diff-XS/ -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedora

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:20 PM, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 09/24/2015 07:12 PM, Christopher wrote: >> I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform >> package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have >> any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

IIRC, sqljet needs netbeans-platform (swing-smth to be precious from netbeans) for its db browser UI which is a subpackage so disabling this part to build (and killing the browser subpackage) should remove the need for netbeans platform Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team - Original Me

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 09/24/2015 07:12 PM, Christopher wrote: > I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform > package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have > any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try to dive in and figure out what's > breaking, does anybody have

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 24 September 2015 at 11:12, Christopher wrote: > I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform > package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have > any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try to dive in and figure out what's > breaking, does anybo

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

I don't really understand what's going on with the netbeans-platform package, or why accumulo would be affected. Upstream accumulo doesn't have any dependencies on netbeans. Before I try to dive in and figure out what's breaking, does anybody have any insight into what's going on with this, and wha

Self Introduction: Phil Sutter

Hi, I recently took over maintenance of the iproute package in Fedora. After having become maintainer of it for RHEL, this was the logical next step. Having a strong background in embedded build systems (I was a core developer of FreeWRT until it deceased and am still contributing to OpenADK), I

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 09/24/2015 05:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 24.9.2015 16:34, Kalev Lember wrote: >> python-Fionachurchyard, group::python-sig > > > This one cannot work with Fedora 23 due to GDAL 2. Feel free to retire it. Can you retire it yourself if it is unfixable, please? 'fedpkg ret

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

Looks like we do have some progress on that topic :) So plan B would be: 1. automate EPEL rebuilds in CBS 2. have CI run automated test suite over EPEL rebuilds Correct me if I'm wrong but we would be ok to enable CentOS folks to fix EPEL packaging. It would be easier if we do create an epel-prov

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Dave Johansen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: >> >> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: >> > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: >> > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm >> > > release

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

Hi Ralph, On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Ralph Bean wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: >> nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy ralph This package is missing needed dependency npm(file-sync-cmp) to be packaged in Fedora. >> nodejs-grunt-saucelabs ralph, piotrp This p

Re: llvm 3.7 for rawhide and then f23

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 6:27 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 21:00 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > On 9/20/15, David Airlie wrote: > > > It's llvm, there is never a good time to upgrade it and no llvm > release is > > > backwards compatible. > > > > Yes, so unless someone is p

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On 24.9.2015 16:34, Kalev Lember wrote: > python-Fionachurchyard, group::python-sig This one cannot work with Fedora 23 due to GDAL 2. Feel free to retire it. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.f

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check-EntersubForCV psabata, iarnell, perl-sig > perl-Data-Dump-Streamer psabata, iarnell, perl-sig > perl-Devel-BeginLiftpsabata, iarnell, perl-sig > perl-Devel-FindRef orphan, perl-sig > perl-Method-Signature

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > nodejs-grunt-contrib-copy ralph > nodejs-grunt-saucelabs ralph, piotrp > nodejs-proxy-agent ralph, piotrp These three got rebuilt this morning (made possible by piotrp's hard work on the rest of the dep chain). signature.asc D

Erroneous automated comments on some Review Request tickets

This morning we deployed a new release of 'the-new-hotness'[1], which is the service we run that monitors new upstream releases from release-monitoring.org, as well as koji builds, and uses this information to file and comment on bugzilla tickets. The release adds a new feature[2] that adds commen

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:13 AM, gil wrote: > > > Il 24/09/2015 16:43, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: > > > > > tritonuslimb, bsjones >> >> Depending on: tritonus (1) >> vorbisspi (maintained by: hicham) >> vorbisspi-1.0.3-10.fc23.noarch requires tritonus = >> 0.3

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 11:00 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 00:59 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > Bummer. The reason for libxkbcommon dependency is to be able to > > make > > sure that the new config is valid. Before that was added we had a > > set > > of rules a

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

Il 24/09/2015 16:43, Jon Ciesla ha scritto: tritonuslimb, bsjones Depending on: tritonus (1) vorbisspi (maintained by: hicham) vorbisspi-1.0.3-10.fc23.noarch requires tritonus = 0.3.7-0.23.20101108cvs.fc22 vorbi

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 00:59 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Bummer. The reason for libxkbcommon dependency is to be able to make > sure that the new config is valid. Before that was added we had a set > of rules and heuristics implemented in localed and regular bug reports > when typos

Re: Applications missing from Fedora 23

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 15:15:16 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > With a bit of gimp'ing, isn't the one on the top right of > http://www.uzbl.org/ good enough to install? That looks a lot like > 64x64. Actually, keis pointed me to an SVG that had already been made: https://github.com/uzbl/uzbl-

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

tritonuslimb, bsjones > > Depending on: tritonus (1) > vorbisspi (maintained by: hicham) > vorbisspi-1.0.3-10.fc23.noarch requires tritonus = > 0.3.7-0.23.20101108cvs.fc22 > vorbisspi-1.0.3-10.fc23.src requires tritonus = > 0.3.7-0.23.20101108

Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F23 tree

Hi all, In less than three weeks we will be entering the F23 Final Freeze. At that point, Fedora release engineering retires any packages that still have broken dependencies in the F23 tree. Based on today's Branched report [1], we still have a number of unfixed packages with broken dependencies

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-09-21)

On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 10:36:05 +0200 Matthias Runge wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:35:30AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for sure that the pack

Re: Applications missing from Fedora 23

On 20 September 2015 at 15:50, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Is this something any app with a too-small icon (or without, I suppose) > can do? For example, uzbl has an icon, but I have no source to make a > scaled up one (and contacting the original author has gotten nothing). With a bit of gimp'ing, isn'

Minutes from Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-09-24)

== #fedora-meeting-2: Env and Stacks (2015-09-24) == Meeting started by hhorak at 12:03:08 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-2/2015-09-24/env-and-stacks.2015-

Re: virtual provides/metapackage for various OpenCL implementations

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Dear maintainers, > I've just enabled OpenCL support in the gromacs package[1] and would > like to express a weak dependency on an OpenCL implementation, but I > have no way of doing so at the moment. > > We have three packa

F-23 Branched report: 20150924 changes

Compose started at Thu Sep 24 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [apache-scout] apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws) apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:

Re: Updating to f23 beta from f22

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda > wrote: > > I followed [1] and tried the section "Fedora 22 -> Fedora 23". But in the > > package list to be downloaded, I find gnome packages with 3.17 rather > than > > 3.18. For exam

rawhide report: 20150924 changes

Compose started at Thu Sep 24 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [IQmol] IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0 IQmol-2.3.0

Re: Updating to f23 beta from f22

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > I followed [1] and tried the section "Fedora 22 -> Fedora 23". But in the > package list to be downloaded, I find gnome packages with 3.17 rather than > 3.18. For example, > > gnome-session x86_64 3.17.92-1.fc23 fedora 3

Re: Updating to f23 beta from f22

I followed [1] and tried the section "Fedora 22 -> Fedora 23". But in the package list to be downloaded, I find gnome packages with 3.17 rather than 3.18. For example, gnome-session x86_64 3.17.92-1.fc23 fedora 378 k Shouldn't f23-beta contain gnome 3.18 packages? am I missing som

Re: Updating to f23 beta from f22

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > How can I update to f23 beta from f22? > > Same way as on other releases, with fedup (see thread on this list > against the release announcement for details)

Re: Updating to f23 beta from f22

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > Hi all, > > How can I update to f23 beta from f22? Same way as on other releases, with fedup (see thread on this list against the release announcement for details) or "dnf distro-sync" as per docs [1] Peter [1] https://fedoraproject

virtual provides/metapackage for various OpenCL implementations

Dear maintainers, I've just enabled OpenCL support in the gromacs package[1] and would like to express a weak dependency on an OpenCL implementation, but I have no way of doing so at the moment. We have three packages which provide OpenCL implementations: beignet - Intel GPUs mesa-libOpenCL - AMD

Updating to f23 beta from f22

Hi all, How can I update to f23 beta from f22? -- Best Regards, Kalpa Welivitigoda +94776509215 http://about.me/callkalpa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: dnf upgrade won't upgrade, but yum-deprecated does!!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265336 -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://awk.io -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

On 09/24/2015 11:10 AM, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Richard Hughes > wrote: > > On 24 September 2015 at 10:04, Kalpa Welivitigoda > mailto:callka...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Will the GNOME 3.18 updates be available to f2

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 24 September 2015 at 10:04, Kalpa Welivitigoda > wrote: > > Will the GNOME 3.18 updates be available to f22 as well? > > There's no plan to do this, sorry. > Thanks for the info. Seems we need to wait till f23 is out :-) > > Richard

dnf upgrade won't upgrade, but yum-deprecated does!!

Hi, I'm running F23. I tried to upgrade the gnome bulk update by using dnf, but nothing happens: sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing Last metadata expiration check performed 0:59:27 ago on Thu Sep 24 10:06:44 2015. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! But using yum-depr

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

On 24 September 2015 at 10:04, Kalpa Welivitigoda wrote: > Will the GNOME 3.18 updates be available to f22 as well? There's no plan to do this, sorry. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http:

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

Hi Kalev, Will the GNOME 3.18 updates be available to f22 as well? On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 09/21/2015 12:12 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > GNOME 3.18.0 is going to be released this week and I'll be wrangling the > > builds for Fedora. Same as with

Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2015-09-24)

WG meeting will be at 12:00 UTC (9:00 EST, 14:00 Brno, 8:00 Boston, 21:00 Tokyo, 22:00 Brisbane) in #fedora-meeting-2 on Freenode. = Topics = * Fedora dockerfiles -- versions, size, more involvement from E&S * Software Collections use cases in semi-containerized world Honza -- devel mailing l

Re: Fedora 23 Branched 20150923 compose check report

On Wed, 2015-09-23 at 10:25 -0400, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud disk raw i386 > Cloud disk raw x86_64 > Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64 > Generic boot i386 > Generic boot x86_64 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mash/branched-20150923/logs/pungify-x86_64.log 2

[Bug 1265966] New: Upgrade perl-Nagios-Plugin to 0.990000

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265966 Bug ID: 1265966 Summary: Upgrade perl-Nagios-Plugin to 0.99 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Nagios-Plugin Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: psab...@red

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2015-09-21)

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:35:30AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: > htt

Re: GNOME 3.18.0 megaupdate

On 09/21/2015 12:12 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > Hi all, > > GNOME 3.18.0 is going to be released this week and I'll be wrangling the > builds for Fedora. Same as with the pre-releases we've built so far, we > are still using the f23-gnome side tag in koji for preparing everything. > If you are helpi

Re: Fedora 23 cloud image (and, for that matter, minimal anything) bloat

Dne 22.9.2015 v 11:07 Matej Stuchlik napsal(a): > > When it comes to python3, one way to shave off ~9MiB from python3-libs, and > possibly quite a bit more overall, would be to not install both optimized and > unoptimized bytecode, as we do now, but just the unoptimized one (the > performance > hi