f0bc18b49ee9fe07273c639dd135a67f Net-SSH2-0.56.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Net-SSH2/Net-SSH2-0.56.tar.gz/md5/f0bc18b49ee9fe07273c639dd135a67f/Net-SSH2-0.56.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270507
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270507
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Net-SSH2-0.56-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2e0cd6b407
--
You are receiving this mail
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
From d28be5d3aa54264406b4524029a4a330533dd879 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:20:04 +0200
Subject: 0.56 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Net-SSH2.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
From f4fca96fd91a136814aee4fea83045a9d6c58cf4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:51:33 +0200
Subject: Remove bogus requirement on TARGET_CLASS found by
perl-generators-1.06
---
perl-Sys-Info-Base.spec | 8 +++-
1
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2015-10-12
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's QA meeting time again tomorrow, however I'm likely not going to be
around as it's a vacation
From 9e0ce57f43d6d1dbfd54212a531fa37c033d6a1b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 09:20:04 +0200
Subject: 0.56 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Net-SSH2.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
From b2e92e90224b223257fe55cc564f35b81df8841a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:47:03 +0200
Subject: 1.05 bump; Resolves: bug #1267267
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-generators.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3
From db0aea5819928cc6d96cddd6d8004883be3c543d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:34:06 +0200
Subject: 1.06 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
sources| 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.gitignore
From d0dcde064a0cbc84945889501d243a4df8a51f55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:30:53 +0200
Subject: 1.06 bump
---
perl-generators.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-generators.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270090
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270090
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Unicode-Normalize-1.21-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 10/10/2015 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Then you try to port the application to the new APIs, and if it's not
> possible, you revert the library commit that removed the old API.
Well, hold on: you now have the problem of maintaining a local fork.
Surely that is more than a package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267267
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-generators-1.06-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-cdf9928134
--
You are receiving this mail
Hi all,
It's GNOME 3.18.1 release this week and I'll be wrangling the builds for
Fedora. Same drill as with previous megaupdates: if you are helping with
builds, please use f23-gnome build target.
$ fedpkg build --target f23-gnome
I'll take care of submitting them all in a single bodhi update
Dne 9.10.2015 v 17:46 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:05:00 +0200
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> This does not scale unfortunately ... and it is common excuse to not
>> support it properly. IOW, I want to have package foo-1.0 installed
>> side by side with foo-2.0
Dne 10.10.2015 v 02:50 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Chris Adams wrote:
>> Is that short-sighted? IMHO yes. Can Fedora fix that? Doubtful.
>> There are three choices:
>>
>> - Fedora attempts to patch in a stable(-enough) ABI, build shared
>> libraries, and unbundle all consumers of said
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
- Original Message -
> Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Bundling is _not_ intrinsically poor practice. Firefox is a good
> > example of this,
>
> Firefox is exactly an example of how NOT to do things, and I'm fed up of it
> getting a blanket exception to our packaging guidelines. And now the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267267
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-generators-1.06-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-764bf750c1
--
You are receiving this mail
From c4ec01f26a65138bd344cab4faa193e3a1b51e0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:47:03 +0200
Subject: 1.05 bump; Resolves: bug #1267267
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-generators.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3
From 42169323fafbeebae6dcd51b00f682778df499c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:30:53 +0200
Subject: 1.06 bump
---
perl-generators.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-generators.spec
From b91aaf787bffe8fff15a161878f729221d29440c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:34:06 +0200
Subject: 1.06 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
sources| 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.gitignore
Hello all,
I've orphaned openct and ctapi-common packages on Rawhide as I do not
use them anymore. If nobody picks them they can be safely retired by the
automated process as nothing seems to depend on them. If you pick them,
please consider mailing me and asking for transfer of the ownership
From 8cdaa2108229f5f0786c18bc82347a74eeeb4d3d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:34:06 +0200
Subject: 1.06 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
sources| 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/.gitignore
From 594e3b3921358558773b72d451fe0080f0b688b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 09:47:03 +0200
Subject: 1.05 bump; Resolves: bug #1267267
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-generators.spec | 6 +-
sources | 2 +-
3
From 45f95dd3adc55145be97020f507da2ce17562101 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:30:53 +0200
Subject: 1.06 bump
---
perl-generators.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-generators.spec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267267
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-generators-1.06-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fda676f6c9
--
You are receiving this mail
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, opensou...@till.name wrote:
zziplib orphan, thias1 weeks ago
I picked up zziplib as it is needed for texlive and by extension of
that, to krb5 builds.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Ian Malone wrote:
> Maybe there's some confusion about the point I was making. I'm
> referring to the case where the bundled library has functions that are
> no longer present in the fedora version and the application requires
> them.
And I already answered that point:
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
57 packages were orphaned
-
alliance [el6, el5] was orphaned by kevin
VLSI EDA System
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/alliance
archimedes [f23, f22,
Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 10/10/2015 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Then you try to port the application to the new APIs, and if it's not
>> possible, you revert the library commit that removed the old API.
>
> Well, hold on: you now have the problem of maintaining a local fork.
> Surely that
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Precisely RPM Fusion is recently example which does not work ... Where
> are Rawhide builds? Where are the F23 builds ...
They are in the middle of an infrastructure transition and decided to not do
any more branches on the old infrastructure, which is really an RPM Fusion
Dne 12.10.2015 v 17:20 Kevin Kofler napsal(a):
> Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> and we ignore the rest of the world who could build something useful on
>> the top of the Fedora.
> They just need to rebuild their stuff as well. It works fine for RPM Fusion.
>
> Kevin Kofler
>
Precisely RPM Fusion
- Original Message -
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Because adding downstream features to a system library really is the way
> > to keep ABI (not). We wouldn't even be able to use Ubuntu binaries in
> > Fedora.
>
> As long as we only ADD features, using foreign binaries on Fedora should
>
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Because adding downstream features to a system library really is the way
> to keep ABI (not). We wouldn't even be able to use Ubuntu binaries in
> Fedora.
As long as we only ADD features, using foreign binaries on Fedora should
work fine. The opposite might not, but
Vít Ondruch wrote:
> and we ignore the rest of the world who could build something useful on
> the top of the Fedora.
They just need to rebuild their stuff as well. It works fine for RPM Fusion.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Adam Jackson wrote:
> You can compute this statically. You know the DT_NEEDED tree for every
> dynamic object.
… only if dlopen is not used (which, as I am going to explain below, is not
anywhere near as harmless as you think).
> For applications that don't call dlopen (themselves or in their
>
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> 2 distributions add slightly different versions of the same functionality
> -> incompatible
I said that carrying more feature patches makes it "more likely" that
packages from other distros will work, not "100% certain" (which is
obviously not possible when there are
2876ae35f464e14b491afe75ff349ed5 DateTime-Format-Atom-v1.2.0.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-DateTime-Format-Atom/DateTime-Format-Atom-v1.2.0.tar.gz/md5/2876ae35f464e14b491afe75ff349ed5/DateTime-Format-Atom-v1.2.0.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
On Saturday, 10 October 2015 at 01:01, Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
> On 10/9/2015 1:54 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >You could ask to become the maintainer in EPEL:
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer
> >
> >>That looks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270500
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-DateTime-Format-Atom-1.2.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2683f2ea2e
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270503
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270504
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-File-Path-2.12-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=691171
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270508
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.042-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=691178
--
You are receiving this mail
bf733d45db14cc55c19e41c95bf12098 experimental-0.016.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-experimental/experimental-0.016.tar.gz/md5/bf733d45db14cc55c19e41c95bf12098/experimental-0.016.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Compose started at Mon Oct 12 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[CableSwig]
CableSwig-3.20.0-13.fc23.i686 requires gccxml
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270500
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270502
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fdb202b2d8
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268632
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-fdb202b2d8
--
You are receiving this
1cc071ccb01ea19bef12a8540f64c7b8 ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280224.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder/ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280224.tar.gz/md5/1cc071ccb01ea19bef12a8540f64c7b8/ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280224.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270503
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280224-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b4b54fa805
--
You are receiving
e6616ca24c071d03654e56a35d51f683 PPIx-Regexp-0.042.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-PPIx-Regexp/PPIx-Regexp-0.042.tar.gz/md5/e6616ca24c071d03654e56a35d51f683/PPIx-Regexp-0.042.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
From 8232613b3d959290767748ad328ae3706eca0146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:04:08 +0200
Subject: 1.2.0 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-Atom.spec | 18 ++
sources
From b339c9c122ecb1c0c24708b021a009d8723eefbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:30:20 +0200
Subject: 0.280224 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec | 7 +--
sources
75e983ccb2523bd16af93582de10443c File-Path-2.12.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-Path/File-Path-2.12.tar.gz/md5/75e983ccb2523bd16af93582de10443c/File-Path-2.12.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270504
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
From 8232613b3d959290767748ad328ae3706eca0146 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:04:08 +0200
Subject: 1.2.0 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-Atom.spec | 18 ++
sources
From e2ba87d07cde12d1b43f23c618683879f0e53e25 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:18:06 +0200
Subject: 0.016 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-experimental.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files
From f8ccd625fd56f6281312cb53753fd5830eec0fee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:18:06 +0200
Subject: 0.016 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-experimental.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270502
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270503
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder-0.280224-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=691149
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270507
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
From f8ccd625fd56f6281312cb53753fd5830eec0fee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:18:06 +0200
Subject: 0.016 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-experimental.spec | 5 -
sources| 2 +-
3 files
Compose started at Mon Oct 12 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[389-ds-base]
389-ds-base-1.3.4.4-1.fc23.armv7hl requires librpmio.so.3
389-ds-base-1.3.4.4-1.fc23.armv7hl requires librpm.so.3
[CableSwig]
From b339c9c122ecb1c0c24708b021a009d8723eefbb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:30:20 +0200
Subject: 0.280224 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder.spec | 7 +--
sources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270502
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=691144
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270502
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5ba9ca017e
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268632
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-experimental-0.016-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5ba9ca017e
--
You are receiving this
From 45dacb135d2b4879d881e83154761ff5d16200f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:51:26 +0200
Subject: 2.12 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-Path.spec | 16 +---
sources | 2 +-
3
From a8ae9480467cbcf1b97f4762e2e5ee2cf1008025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:13:29 +0200
Subject: 0.042 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-PPIx-Regexp.spec | 12 +---
sources | 2 +-
=
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel
=
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-10-12/fedora-qadevel.2015-10-12-14.01.html
Minutes (text):
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270508
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-PPIx-Regexp
---
On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 01:51 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> * Scanning binary packages for conflicting symbols does not work either
> because they are only a problem if the conflicting libraries get dragged
> into the same executable at runtime.
You can compute this statically. You know the
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
722 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
487 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
337
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> 2 distributions add slightly different versions of the same functionality
>> -> incompatible
>
> I said that carrying more feature patches makes it "more likely" that
> packages from other
On 12 October 2015 at 16:27, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ian Malone wrote:
>> Maybe there's some confusion about the point I was making. I'm
>> referring to the case where the bundled library has functions that are
>> no longer present in the fedora version and the application
On 10/12/2015 04:29 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/2015 12:12 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> Then you try to port the application to the new APIs, and if it's not
>>> possible, you revert the library commit that removed the old API.
>>
>> Well, hold on: you now have the
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20151011
Images in 23 Branched 20151011 but not this:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Soas disk raw armhfp
Server disk raw armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 8 of 52
ID: 5552Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 5551
I want to get taskotron-stg rebuilt with f22 before final freeze
tomorrow. Hopefully I got all the kinks worked out of the playbooks
when I updated dev so this shouldn't take too long.
I'll send another email when it's done.
Tim
pgpbutXwXqWPo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
217 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
113 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
46
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
113 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
96 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
90
Il 08/10/2015 18:11, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto:
On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 04:57:27PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 8.10.2015 v 16:44 gil napsal(a):
hi
i missing somethings...
how can set InitialCC with java-sig in pkgdb for a new package?
regards
thanks in advance
gil
On 10/10/2015 01:25 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
Hello all,
Over the last few weeks, I've been working on a number of packages that use
CMake for the build system for various distros, and I've noticed something
rather peculiar. Of all the distros I've built packages for (Fedora/CentOS,
openSUSE,
Greetings,
For the entire history of Fedora adding new packages, requesting new
branches for existing packages and other similar requests have been
done via copying and pasting a template into a bugzilla bug, where it
was scraped by a script to process the requests.
With recent additions to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267267
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270500
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270507
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268632
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270502
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
4e3de70a8ce2ab0815daf90b73b6db6e HTML-Scrubber-0.15.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-HTML-Scrubber/HTML-Scrubber-0.15.tar.gz/md5/4e3de70a8ce2ab0815daf90b73b6db6e/HTML-Scrubber-0.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270503
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
> You need to open a ticket and request that version bump.
>
> Note that this may conflict with EPEL updates policy, then the
> alternatives would be providing a parallel installable version of
> Erlang packages.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL_Updates_Policy
>
> Regards,
> H.
Ah right,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242918
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1082168
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1082168=edit
[patch] Update to 1.25 (#1242918)
--
You are
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo