https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285428
--- Comment #5 from Till Maas ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Crypt-ScryptKDF
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
till changed dfateyev's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Term-Size (epel7) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Size/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
till changed dfateyev's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Term-Size (epel7) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Size/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
till changed dfateyev's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Term-Size (epel7) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Size/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
till changed dfateyev's 'commit' permission on perl-Term-Size (epel7) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Size/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
till created the branch 'epel7' for the package 'perl-Term-Size'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Size/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
till changed dfateyev's branch request for perl-Term-Size in epel7 from
Awaiting Review to Approved
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Term-Size/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 14:06 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I recently added the package python-rpdb to F22/23/rawhide. The build
> failed in Koji due to having a BuildRequires on python3-devel. It seems
> that it is called python34-devel in EL 7. This leads me to wonder on a
> few
On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 10:24 -0500, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Failed openQA tests: 48 of 49
new dracut broke the world:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285903
KDE also seems to be booting to a Plasma shell error, I'll check that
out.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285914
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11989214
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285915
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11989222
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285418
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285913
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11989212
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285909
Bug ID: 1285909
Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-5.042 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dist-Zilla
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285915
Bug ID: 1285915
Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.007 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal-Encoder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285914
Bug ID: 1285914
Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.007 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal-Decoder
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285913
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1099503
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1099503=edit
[patch] Update to 3.007 (#1285913)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285914
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1099504
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1099504=edit
[patch] Update to 3.007 (#1285914)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285915
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1099505
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1099505=edit
[patch] Update to 3.007 (#1285915)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285418
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-gettext-1.07-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285913
Bug ID: 1285913
Summary: perl-Sereal-3.007 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Sereal
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279831
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Carp-1.38-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279831
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Carp-1.38-1.fc24
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48361
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48361/0001-Ticket-48361-
Expand-389ds-monitoring-capabilities.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282914
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Lingua-Translit-0.23-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279831
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Carp-1.38-1.fc24
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279831
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Carp-1.38-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPSCo weekly meeting on 2015-11-27 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC
At e...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/2542/
___
epel-devel
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
263 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
159 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6813
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el7
67
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
159 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828
chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6
141 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031
python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6
135
msuchy set the monitor flag of perl-Schedule-Cron-Events to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285518
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
>From 1292f901f5fc8dc35d7aa465e93877d370e75ab6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:06:02 +0100
Subject: Rebuild against the latest libxml2
---
perl-XML-LibXML.spec | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-XML-LibXSLT to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
jplesnik set the monitor flag of perl-XML-LibXML to nobuild
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>From 7fcba3d0ebbebae1c5bdf8ade10628adf034bdec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:54:16 +0100
Subject: Rebuild against the latest libxml2
---
perl-XML-LibXML.spec | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
>From 9554b6cbf04815374429b679f96c66d5d473603f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:06:08 +0100
Subject: Rebuild against the latest libxml2
---
perl-XML-LibXML.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279401
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar ---
I checked all perlish packages built with the broken file packages in the Koji
(53) and the only affected package was postgrey, so I rebuild it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 05:59:28PM +0100, Petr Pisar wrote:
> There was a bug in `file' package that could break generating Perl
> dependencies while building RPM packages.
>
612 packages were rebuilt with a broken file package. 53 of them were perlish
packages. I checked all of them and I found
* Petr Pisar [26/11/2015 12:25] :
>
> 612 packages were rebuilt with a broken file package. 53 of them were perlish
> packages. I checked all of them and I found only one broken package. I rebuild
> the broken postgrey package.
Thank you for doing all this, Petr.
Emmanuel
--
Fedora Extras Perl
734869458f52b9ccdc84a2cdee48c42c File-DesktopEntry-0.21.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-File-DesktopEntry/File-DesktopEntry-0.21.tar.gz/md5/734869458f52b9ccdc84a2cdee48c42c/File-DesktopEntry-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
>From 8c6e63ac7fc632fa4cbcabb13f37c11422290836 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:53:20 +0100
Subject: 0.21 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-File-DesktopEntry.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285566
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed
63286ff320b20977d663f7c639a3039a App-perlbrew-0.74.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perlbrew/App-perlbrew-0.74.tar.gz/md5/63286ff320b20977d663f7c639a3039a/App-perlbrew-0.74.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
>From 14d8975831dd406aabd1c0b6c3a66b07c8f0fd36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 14:55:07 +0100
Subject: 0.74 bump
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perlbrew.spec | 23 ---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285554
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Fixed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285807
Bug ID: 1285807
Summary: Opening About Slic3r dialog window crashes slic3r
Product: Fedora
Version: 23
Component: slic3r
Assignee: mhron...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285807
--- Comment #1 from Tom Georgoulias ---
Found these upstream bugs
https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/2881
https://github.com/alexrj/Slic3r/issues/2984
$ slic3r --debug --gui
wxWidgets version wxWidgets 2.8.12, Wx version
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285807
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok ---
Thanks for reporting and pairing with upstream bug. Let's just see what
Alessandro finds out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
131896dd0842312d7c1e819ca6074c6c Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0203.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS/Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0203.tar.gz/md5/131896dd0842312d7c1e819ca6074c6c/Cpanel-JSON-XS-3.0203.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
From 37844ab84c78fc9945eb3c752d982176ff185e6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:14:41 +
Subject: Update to 3.0203
- New upstream release 3.0203
- Simplify handling of references, removing all the complicated work-around
for
From 37844ab84c78fc9945eb3c752d982176ff185e6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:14:41 +
Subject: Update to 3.0203
- New upstream release 3.0203
- Simplify handling of references, removing all the complicated work-around
for
> dracut itself contains the configuration about what modules get built
> into the initramfs in what situations. Live images use a generic (--no-
> hostonly) initramfs. I'd talk to the dracut maintainer about the
> appropriate way to add these.
Hmm, it looks like dracut-live contains the module
On 25.11.2015 10:03, Tomas Hozza wrote:
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
>
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Robert Mayr wrote:
>
> Il 25/nov/2015 07:50 PM, "Jan Kurik" ha scritto:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Robert Mayr
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Il 24/nov/2015 09:27 AM, "Jan Kurik"
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>> dracut itself contains the configuration about what modules get built
>> into the initramfs in what situations. Live images use a generic (--no-
>> hostonly) initramfs. I'd talk to the dracut maintainer about the
>>
As the Fedora 21 support is going to be EOL, we are going to close all
the Fedora 21 bugs which remains open the next Tuesday 2015-12-01 [1].
You have the last chance to submit your updates to the Fedora 21, if
you have any, before the F-21 release becomes unsupported.
[1]
Planned Outage: Copr upgrade - 2015-11-30 08:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2015-11-30 08:00 UTC, which will last
approximately 4 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run:
date -d '-MM-DD HH:MM UTC'
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
Compose started at Thu Nov 26 05:15:02 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
On 25 November 2015 at 22:01, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-25 at 15:40 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>> On 11/25/2015 03:25 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Adam Williamson
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Fri,
Heads up for Rawhide users. It seems that
gnome-shell-3.19.2-1.fc24.x86_64 is broken so avoid updates to this
version if you can. Downgrading back to
gnome-shell-3.19.1-3.20151110.fc24 and
gnome-shell-extensions-3.19.1-1.fc24 workarounds the issues for me.
Would be nice if Gnome people can take a
I have a feeling I just missed some information, so rather asking prior
submitting a ticket to infra. The problem is that after the migration,
I'm not able to login as mail-list admin to approve mails.
I get the mail notice that goes to
env-and-stacks-ow...@lists.fedoraproject.org, so I
Hi there,
the license of the aubio package has changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ in
versions 0.4.0 and later. This only affects Rawhide/F-24 and later as
the changes in aubio-0.4.x are quite extensive and require a package to
be built against the new version. Not many packages require aubio --
> OK, so what are the risks under Wayland?
>
...
>
> Since the security is improved under Wayland, are non-elevated applications
> still able to eavesdrop or falsify input/output of elevated applications?
> The opposite direction is not that important, I think, because if you run
> something as
On 2015-11-26, Honza Horak wrote:
> I have a feeling I just missed some information, so rather asking prior
> submitting a ticket to infra. The problem is that after the migration,
> I'm not able to login as mail-list admin to approve mails.
>
> I get the mail notice that
Missing expected images:
Cloud disk raw i386
Cloud disk raw x86_64
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20151125
No images in Rawhide 20151125 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 48 of 49
ID: 9071Test:
> It's probably defined in the lorax template [1] which is part of what
> live-media-creator uses. Currently for F-23 we actually use
> livecd-creator but in F-24 we'll be moving to lmc because it then uses
> the same code paths etc as the rest of the tools we use to build the
> distro so that's
Hi team,
please, review my patch for lib389 repo.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48360
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48360/0001-Ticket-48360-Refactor-the-delete-agreement-function.patch
Thank you,
Simon
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@%(host_name)s
After unorphaning oidentd package, I corrected review sources and
corrected license tag in Fedora 24 from (GPLv2) to
(GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ and BSD and MIT and GFDL).
-- Petr
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Should be fixed by http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=701581
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hello!
I recently added the package python-rpdb to F22/23/rawhide. The build
failed in Koji due to having a BuildRequires on python3-devel. It seems
that it is called python34-devel in EL 7. This leads me to wonder on a
few things:
0) Should I call my package python34-rpdb in EL 7 for
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 09:25:39AM +0600, Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have an issue with building a package under arm arch [1]. i686 and
> x86_64 builds completed with no errors but not arm. It is running
> (or staled) already more then for 10 hours.
>
> The question: could I
74 matches
Mail list logo