https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295592
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294724
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar ---
*** Bug 1295592 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
1b91edb15953a8188f011ab5ff433300 Mozilla-CA-20160104.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Mozilla-CA/Mozilla-CA-20160104.tar.gz/md5/1b91edb15953a8188f011ab5ff433300/Mozilla-CA-20160104.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Compose started at Tue Jan 5 05:15:02 UTC 2016
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
From e6a3028c1db5b68676b477cf4957ae5772c8db6e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:29:00 +0100
Subject: 20160104 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
>From 2c2d44eda5a11c37f84627e9e9e2101f5e0c106e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:13:14 +
Subject: Update to 0.13
- New upstream release 0.13
- Fix #12 (conflict with multiple chunks)
---
perl-Test-Synopsis.spec | 7 +--
sources
Which one do you use? Having both is confusing, as noted in [1], so I'm
planning to remove one of them. What do you think should be the default?
Please, write what *you* think/use, not what you guess that other people
might want to use.
For me, it's emacs.desktop, since clicking the desktop icon
On 05/01/16 10:23, Jan Synacek wrote:
For me, it's emacs.desktop, since clicking the desktop icon is then
simply consitent with the rest of the icons. The emacsclient behavior is
just weird.
Agreed, emacs.desktop is the application.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295594
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-Mozilla-CA-20160104-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709112
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295594
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
519b8eaea055df75be31fde7190f6209 Test-Synopsis-0.13.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Test-Synopsis/Test-Synopsis-0.13.tar.gz/md5/519b8eaea055df75be31fde7190f6209/Test-Synopsis-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
Quoting Jan Kurik (2015-12-07 16:28:22)
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: sen - terminal user interface for
> docker engine =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/sen--tui-for-docker
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Tomas Tomecek
>
> sen enables you to manage your containers and images
>From 2c2d44eda5a11c37f84627e9e9e2101f5e0c106e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 09:13:14 +
Subject: Update to 0.13
- New upstream release 0.13
- Fix #12 (conflict with multiple chunks)
---
perl-Test-Synopsis.spec | 7 +--
sources
Michael Schwendt writes:
> On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 15:35:51 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
>> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific files
>> there. I believe it was done the
Am 05.01.2016 um 11:17 schrieb Jan Synacek:
Michael Schwendt writes:
2) A dependency on emacs-filesystem is primarily for packages, which store
files in those directories, but which do _not_ need Emacs to be installed.
Splitting off emacs- subpackages is not always the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295594
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In
On 5 Jan 2016 11:28, "Tom Hughes" wrote:
>
> On 05/01/16 10:23, Jan Synacek wrote:
>
>> For me, it's emacs.desktop, since clicking the desktop icon is then
>> simply consitent with the rest of the icons. The emacsclient behavior is
>> just weird.
>
>
> Agreed, emacs.desktop is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295760
--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
ppisar's perl-Pod-Usage-1.68-1.fc24 completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=709187
--
You are receiving this mail
pghmcfc changed robert's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Socket6 (f23) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pghmcfc changed robert's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Socket6 (f22) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pghmcfc changed robert's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Socket6 (f22) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pghmcfc changed robert's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Socket6 (master) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
From 73ca92168b69978a9969f2ec0057f8d56ca70d7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 16:44:01 +0100
Subject: List the CGI dependency
---
perl-HTML-Mason.spec | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
>From afd10fddbe40ed02a758aeb12025dfbd89dbd496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:30:19 +0100
Subject: Switch to %global
---
perl-DateTime-Format-Builder.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
>From 10aeb8a6b8b5105de40e16f72fc7dd8cdaa21d0d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:32:05 +0100
Subject: Switch to %global
---
perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
I did get a response from Jeff Ortel (Suds upstream and Fedora maintainer)
with his input on this proposal (forwarded with his permission).
Regards,
Scott
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 12:18:45 -0600
From: Jeff Ortel
To: Scott Talbert
On 12/23/2015 10:57 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I'm trying to build the ppc64le branch of OpenBLAS on EPEL7. But, I get the
>> following error message in the setup phase:
>>
>> DEBUG util.py:393: Error: No Package found for /usr/bin/execstack
>>
>> Why would this binary not exist on ppc64le?
>
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:01:02PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> coccinelle (rjones)
coccinelle.spec has:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")}
TBH I have no idea if this is correct or not,
>From 72054007b457d4416b7353b815558dd69341f5ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:27:01 +0100
Subject: Switch to %global
---
perl-BSD-Resource.spec | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
>From 441c4e2b16392cf78465e4292fd3c46f84550640 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 17:33:09 +0100
Subject: Switch to %global
---
perl-Spreadsheet-ParseExcel.spec | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015 23:42:58 -
" mastaiza" wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114370
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114007
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285277
Christoph is likely busy... but I'm happy to
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 02:13:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> perl-HTML-Mason-1.42-2.el6.src.rpm
Should be fixed in perl-HTML-Mason-1.42-3.el6.
P
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
epel-devel mailing list
pghmcfc changed robert's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Socket6 (master) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pghmcfc changed robert's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Socket6 (f23) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Summary
===
Bugzilla is a Web-based bug-tracking system used by a large number of
software projects. The following security issues have been discovered
in Bugzilla:
* Unfiltered HTML injected into a dependency graph could be used to
create a
Today we are releasing 5.0.2, 4.4.11, and 4.2.16. All releases fix
two security issues found since the last releases.
Bugzilla 5.0.2 is our latest stable release. It contains several
important bug fixes for the 5.0 branch.
Bugzilla 4.4.11 and 4.2.16 are security fix updates for the 4.4
>From what I gather from the logs, it appears that COPR just choked during
this build. Is that true? Or am I missing something else?
Thanks,
Dave
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:21 AM
Subject: daveisfera's llvm_3.7 copr
Hi,
Are there users of website meta-language using fedora? I use it for
some projects and thought it would be a useful addition. If you are a
user of it please do the review for it at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295710
regards,
Nikos
--
devel mailing list
pghmcfc changed robert's 'commit' permission on perl-Socket6 (master) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
5eee1f6d7c20715f77e887d78cf77432 Pod-Usage-1.68.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Pod-Usage/Pod-Usage-1.68.tar.gz/md5/5eee1f6d7c20715f77e887d78cf77432/Pod-Usage-1.68.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel
Missing expected images:
Kde disk raw armhfp
Cloud_atomic disk raw x86_64
Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160104:
Lxde live x86_64
Images in Rawhide 20160104 but not this:
Scientific_kde live i386
Games live x86_64
Server disk raw armhfp
Scientific_kde live x86_64
Games live i386
pghmcfc changed robert's 'commit' permission on perl-Socket6 (f22) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
pghmcfc changed robert's 'commit' permission on perl-Socket6 (f23) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Socket6/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295760
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
This requires Pod::Text >= 4, suitable for Fedora >= 24 only.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
I was testing an update to a package and the mock build worked just fine
when doing builds on EL 7 and Fedora 22/23, but failed with the following
error when trying to do a rawhide build:
~> mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --rebuild
~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/hgsubversion-1.8.4-1.el7.centos.src.rpm
INFO:
On 01/05/2016 07:16 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 03:01:02PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
coccinelle (rjones)
coccinelle.spec has:
%{!?python_sitelib: %define python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from
distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: sen - terminal user interface for
> docker engine =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/sen--tui-for-docker
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Tomas Tomecek
>
> sen enables you to manage your
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 8:08 AM, Dave Johansen
wrote:
> From what I gather from the logs, it appears that COPR just choked during
> this build. Is that true? Or am I missing something else?
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295760
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In
>From 69f6917d8010f327e020d0e0a7aad179edeef92c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 15:01:24 +0100
Subject: 1.68 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Pod-Usage.spec | 18 ++
sources | 2 +-
3
> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi writes:
TK> We would have been in a lot better place today if we had separate
TK> packaging of python2 and python3 packages in Fedora so that they
TK> were never in sync there but that's not something we can probably
TK> change now
Nothing
So, I've started packaging up a bunch of python3 only packages for EPEL7
for packages that were already in RHEL7. I've started by packaging the
latest version of the modules:
python34-py.noarch 1.4.30-2.el7 epel-testing
python34-setuptools.noarch 19.2-3.el7
So, I've started packaging up a bunch of python3 only packages for EPEL7
for packages that were already in RHEL7. I've started by packaging the
latest version of the modules:
python34-py.noarch 1.4.30-2.el7 epel-testing
python34-setuptools.noarch 19.2-3.el7
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48399
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48399/0001-Ticket-48399-
Add-helper-makefile-to-lib389-to-build-.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
When I am building evas-generic-loaders-1.16.0-1.el7.src.rpm,
I see this:
Error: No Package found for LibRaw-devel
LibRaw-devel for epel7 is retired, but is available in
@rhel-7-workstation-optional-beta-rpms
What should I do to let koji know where to get LibRaw-devel?
Regards,
--
Ding-Yi Chen
> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi writes:
TK> We would have been in a lot better place today if we had separate
TK> packaging of python2 and python3 packages in Fedora so that they
TK> were never in sync there but that's not something we can probably
TK> change now
Nothing
On 01/05/2016 07:26 PM, Thomas Daede wrote:
That's all x86 assembly, not ARM.
It looks like all that program is doing is trying to select a bundled
software mesa implementation. None of those are probably included in the
Fedora build anyway, I'd suggest patching to not build that executable
at
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
808 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893
libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5
573 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626
puppet-2.7.26-1.el5
422
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:07:22PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> So, I've started packaging up a bunch of python3 only packages for EPEL7 for
> packages that were already in RHEL7. I've started by packaging the latest
> version of the modules:
>
> python34-py.noarch 1.4.30-2.el7
On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:07:22PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> So, I've started packaging up a bunch of python3 only packages for EPEL7 for
> packages that were already in RHEL7. I've started by packaging the latest
> version of the modules:
>
> python34-py.noarch 1.4.30-2.el7
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:17:15 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> > 2) A dependency on emacs-filesystem is primarily for packages, which store
> > files in those directories, but which do _not_ need Emacs to be installed.
> > Splitting off emacs- subpackages is not always the most wise/convenient
> >
On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> long time ago, there was a request to create the emacs-filesystem
> package [1], so other packages could drop their emacs-specific files
> there. I believe it was done the other way around... Those files are
>
On Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:23:02 +0100, Jan Synacek wrote:
> Which one do you use? Having both is confusing, as noted in [1], so I'm
> planning to remove one of them. What do you think should be the default?
> Please, write what *you* think/use, not what you guess that other people
> might want to
Jonathan Underwood writes:
> On 4 January 2016 at 14:35, Jan Synacek wrote:
>> ...
>> Any comments? Maybe there are still people that were involved with the
>> change?
>
> Those unaware of history are doomed to repeat it :)
That's why I'm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295759
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Dist-Zilla-5.043-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-76ed580393
--
You are receiving this mail
From 04a87dd0e90e21895cd8d0732998d60b44482cc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:59:22 +0100
Subject: 5.043 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Dist-Zilla.spec | 7 ++-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed,
877d1efd11089b4da5049320117da9d1 Dist-Zilla-5.043.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Dist-Zilla/Dist-Zilla-5.043.tar.gz/md5/877d1efd11089b4da5049320117da9d1/Dist-Zilla-5.043.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
From 04a87dd0e90e21895cd8d0732998d60b44482cc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20=C5=A0abata?=
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 13:59:22 +0100
Subject: 5.043 bump
---
.gitignore | 1 +
perl-Dist-Zilla.spec | 7 ++-
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed,
Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses
for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the
unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
addresses in FAS). If they're not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295975
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 981
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=981=edit
[patch] Update to 3.08 (#1295975)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295975
Bug ID: 1295975
Summary: perl-libnet-3.08 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-libnet
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295978
Bug ID: 1295978
Summary: perl-Math-BigInt-1.999715 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Math-BigInt
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295978
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Failed to kick off scratch build.
list index out of range
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295975
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12426490
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295759
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292989
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Dave Johansen
wrote:
> I was testing an update to a package and the mock build worked just fine
> when doing builds on EL 7 and Fedora 22/23, but failed with the following
> error when trying to do a rawhide build:
> ~> mock -r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284623
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285486
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
303 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
95 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-925e9374c9
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.el7
65
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295759
Bug ID: 1295759
Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-5.043 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Dist-Zilla
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292989
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-App-cpm-0.112-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-23dc13952c
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295760
Bug ID: 1295760
Summary: perl-Pod-Usage-1.68 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Pod-Usage
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295760
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 815
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=815=edit
[patch] Update to 1.68 (#1295760)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295760
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Scratch build completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12418552
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the
= Proposed Self Contained Change: Cloud MOTD =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Cloud_MOTD
Change owner(s):
* Kushal Das
After logging in the running Cloud instance, the user should get the
pending updates (including security) details as MOTD (message of the
day).
== Detailed Description
paraview is failing to build on arm:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC3-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c:
In function '__cpuid':
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-v5.0.0-RC3-source/fedora/CommandLineExecutables/paraview-config-forward.c:95:3:
error: impossible
That's all x86 assembly, not ARM.
It looks like all that program is doing is trying to select a bundled
software mesa implementation. None of those are probably included in the
Fedora build anyway, I'd suggest patching to not build that executable
at all.
On 01/05/2016 06:12 PM, Orion Poplawski
92 matches
Mail list logo