Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

2016-02-15 Thread Jakub Filak
It looks like that there are no opponents of this change but several supporters and few of them even want to have suid_dumpable=2 in all releases. I was thinking about it and Richard W.M. Jones' email about safeness of suid_dumpable=2 without ABRT gave me an idea to teach ABRT to set suid_dumpab

Re: GCC6: failure with -isystem /usr/include

2016-02-15 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On 2 February 2016 at 07:54, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > That said, why does it bother to do such a mess? Does it think the g++ > driver is not able to do that itself? > I am not sure why qmake-qt5 doesn't want to trust gcc for the system include dirs, but well.. it doesn't. I reduced the problem do

GCC 6 and polymake

2016-02-15 Thread Jerry James
Would one of you C++ experts help me out with a polymake build failure with gcc 6? Polymake defines a Vector class in lib/core/include/Vector.h (also see lib/core/include/GenericVector.h). Unlike with gcc 5 and earlier, everywhere in the code that something like this is done: Vector x = ...; Vec

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:46:32 +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > you are welcome, there will be more packages suffering from the same > problem (I own at least one :-)), sometimes appending "-fsigned-char" > to CFLAGS will be easier. A couple of narrowing-conversion problems had turned up in Oct 2015 alrea

Re: Fedora Rawhide 20160215 compose check report

2016-02-15 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 19:58 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Kde disk raw armhfp > Cloud disk raw i386 > Kde live i386 > Minimal disk raw armhfp > Kde live x86_64 KDE seems to have dependency issues. I'm not sure what's going on with the cloud images. > Images

Re: GCC 6 Binaries segfaulting

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/15/2016 07:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > > I have one package where several of the binaries used for unit testing > are > > segfaulting. > > > > I'm guessing that's not likely a direct GCC 6 issue but some googling > leads > > me to b

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Igor Gnatenko
Here I totally agree with Till and usually I'm doing the same (it doesn't happen often, but anyway). Because I also not available day to day. For example today I have time and next time I will have time like month.. Just wanted to share my opinion. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016, 7:23 PM Josh Boyer wrote

Fedora Rawhide 20160215 compose check report

2016-02-15 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde disk raw armhfp Cloud disk raw i386 Kde live i386 Minimal disk raw armhfp Kde live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide 20160214: Cloud disk qcow x86_64 Cloud disk raw x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant virtualbox x86_64 Cloud_atomic vagrant libvirt x86_64 No imag

Re: GCC 6 Binaries segfaulting

2016-02-15 Thread Florian Weimer
On 02/15/2016 07:44 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > I have one package where several of the binaries used for unit testing are > segfaulting. > > I'm guessing that's not likely a direct GCC 6 issue but some googling leads > me to believe that it could be an ABI breakage with a dependency that has > not

GCC 6 Binaries segfaulting

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Shaw
I have one package where several of the binaries used for unit testing are segfaulting. I'm guessing that's not likely a direct GCC 6 issue but some googling leads me to believe that it could be an ABI breakage with a dependency that has not been rebuilt. Is that the most likely cause? Thanks, R

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:47:08AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> You misunderstand. I was not suggesting you ask for permission. I >> was stating that IRC contact alone, for whatever reason, is not >> necessarily sufficient as an attempt to co

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:47:08AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > You misunderstand. I was not suggesting you ask for permission. I > was stating that IRC contact alone, for whatever reason, is not > necessarily sufficient as an attempt to contact a maintainer. You can > convey _much_ more informat

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-15 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the > global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;" in the global > namespace, in a header. That causes the 'function' struct and > 'std::function' to be ambiguous. Was

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 02/15/2016 04:54 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:46:32PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:35:03 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dan Horák wrote: On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:34:31 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: Can someone point me in

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 04:46:32PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:35:03 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:34:31 -0600 > > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > > > Can someone point me in the right d

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 09:35:03 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:34:31 -0600 > > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > > > Can someone point me in the right direction? My package > > > openCOLLADA is FTBFS in rawhide with the following

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 15-02-16 14:15, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-02-16 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure for dist-git might very much help in these situations. Being able to send a pull req

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:34:31 -0600 > Richard Shaw wrote: > > > Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is > > FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: > > > > > /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac1

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

2016-02-15 Thread Pete Travis
On Feb 10, 2016 6:29 AM, "Josh Boyer" wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Jared K. Smith > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > >> And aren't we supposed to *not* do stuff like this > >> anymore? > > > > > > > > If I had to guess, I'd say that this was

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 08:34:31 -0600 Richard Shaw wrote: > Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is > FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: > > /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac164e68b2512a40914b14c74db260e6ff7d/COLLADABaseUtils/src/COLLADABUUR

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote on 02/15/2016 11:34 PM: > >> Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is >> FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: >> >> >> /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac164e68b2512a409

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Mamoru TASAKA
Richard Shaw wrote on 02/15/2016 11:34 PM: Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac164e68b2512a40914b14c74db260e6ff7d/COLLADABaseUtils/src/COLLADABUURI.cpp:57:2: error: n

openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

2016-02-15 Thread Richard Shaw
Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac164e68b2512a40914b14c74db260e6ff7d/COLLADABaseUtils/src/COLLADABUURI.cpp:57:2: error: narrowing conversion of '-1' from 'int' to 'ch

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Let's Encrypt client now in Fedora

2016-02-15 Thread Jan Kurik
I just deferred this Change as it is not needed anymore. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LetsEncrypt Regards, Jan On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:27 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > On 10 February 2016 at 14:57, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 9:41 AM, James Hogarth >> wrote: >>

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

2016-02-15 Thread Jakub Filak
I'm not a security expert but I would rather start with something less ambitious and more secure. Just for sure. Regards, Jakub On 02/15/2016 11:22 AM, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote: The issue described in the article was fixed by requiring an absolute path in core_pattern (If I understand it corre

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Peter Robinson
>>> > While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure >>> > for dist-git might very much help in these situations. Being able >>> > to send a pull request with your changes easily means you've fixed >>> > it, the maintainer just needs to pull it in. All of the >>> > informatio

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

2016-02-15 Thread nobody
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 32 packages were orphaned - acpitool [f23, f22, master] was orphaned by kevin Command line ACPI client https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/acpitool gmm [f23

Re: liborigin FTBFS

2016-02-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 14/02/16 19:55 +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Yesterday I was notified that liborigin failed to build in rawhide: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307729 The problem is that the package defines a type 'function' in the global namespace, but also puts 'using namespace std;" in

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 15/02/16 13:57 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 15-02-16 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure for dist-git might very much help in these situations. Being able to send a pull request with your changes easily means you've fixed it,

Re: Is my package a special Conflict: snowflake?

2016-02-15 Thread Peter Lemenkov
Hello All! Fortunately this particular issue will be resolved soon. For those who curious - we decided to switch to rds13 as a new upstream for erlang-xmlrpc. It looks more promising since it's actively maintained (last commit to the original xmlrpc repo was ~5 years ago). 2016-02-13 15:59 GMT+01

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:09 AM, Dan Horák wrote: > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:57:39 +0100 > Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 15-02-16 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >> >> >> > While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure >> > for dist-git might very much help in these situ

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 15-02-16 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > >> While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure >> for dist-git might very much help in these situations. Being able to >> send a pull request with your changes easil

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Dan Horák
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 13:57:39 +0100 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 15-02-16 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure > > for dist-git might very much help in these situations. Being able > > to send a pull request with your chan

Re: System CA certificate trust store management meeting

2016-02-15 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2016-02-02 at 17:13 +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > Hello, > for anyone interested in the subject and visiting DevConf in Brno on  > this Friday - we will be holding an informal meeting to gather use-cases  > for needed improvements in this area. We are interested in feedback from  > Fedora/RHEL

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 15-02-16 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: While I'm still very much on the fence about this, moving to pagure for dist-git might very much help in these situations. Being able to send a pull request with your changes easily means you've fixed it, the maintainer just needs to pull it in. All

Re: Please stop modifying other people's packages without coordinating with them first

2016-02-15 Thread Josh Boyer
On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 04:29:38PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > >> I'm not going to weigh in on the changes, but I did want to address >> this in public so others can learn. > > IMHO the kind of changes are important here. The situation was that >

Re: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

2016-02-15 Thread Andrew Clayton
On Mon, 15 Feb 2016 07:00:36 +0100, Jakub Filak wrote: > On 02/12/2016 07:57 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > > We could change the kernel to add suid_dumpable == 3 which is like > > suid_dumpable==2 but only if the core_pattern is a pipe. > > > I didn't know that 3 is supported for suid_dumpable.

Re: dnf remove qemu-img uninstall kernel

2016-02-15 Thread Michal Luscon
On 02/15/2016 08:53 AM, Jan Zelený wrote: On 12. 2. 2016 at 18:42:50, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Sex, 2016-02-12 at 19:36 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: Il 12/02/2016 19:22, Sérgio Basto ha scritto: On Sex, 2016-02-12 at 19:18 +0100, Mattia Verga wrote: I've installed qemu to play with arm virtualiza

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Romain Philibert

2016-02-15 Thread Lubomir Rintel
Hello Romain, On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 10:14 +, Romain Philibert wrote: > Hello, > > I am working at Worldline, we are using massively CentOS and EPEL. > Unfortunately somes packages installed on our serveurs are becoming > retired from EPEL. I would like to be part of the Fedora community in >

Re: ntpstat

2016-02-15 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 08:48:41AM -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 02/12/2016 06:10 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > >It has been included in the ntp package for a very long time, but it's > >not actually part of the upstream ntp package (and can't be as it's > >licensed under GPL). I guess ntpst

Re: Fwd: Use suid_dumpable=2 for development releases

2016-02-15 Thread Miroslav Vadkerti
> The issue described in the article was fixed by requiring an absolute > path in core_pattern (If I understand it correctly). > > If core_pattern is unsafe, the process is not dumped at all (man 5 proc). > > The kernel commit adds a warning, because kernel was silently ignoring > crashes and no

Subject: Self Introduction: Romain Philibert

2016-02-15 Thread Romain Philibert
Hello, I am working at Worldline, we are using massively CentOS and EPEL. Unfortunately somes packages installed on our serveurs are becoming retired from EPEL. I would like to be part of the Fedora community in order to maintain such packages. On my free time, I love playing with OpenSource,