> What would be proper other places to confirm the fingerprint?
The following criteria might be reasonable:
- a place that has authority, that people might trust.
- a place that is hard to impersonate, that has some protection
against unauthorized use
- a place that is visib
Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my
secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it
works just fine after restart)? It used to work. If it didn't work right
away, opening control panel typically helped, but nowadays, it does not
appear to work
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my
> secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it
> works just fine after restart)? It used to work. If it didn't work right
> away, opening control pan
Dne 7.3.2016 v 11:47 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my
>> secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it
>> works just fine after restart)? It used to wor
Hi
I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18)
I will also rebuild dependent packages:
- fastd
- usbguard
- zeromq
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Dne 7.3.2016 v 11:47 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Not sure where should I report this issue, but I am wondering, why my
>>> secondary monitor is not detected after docking my Rawhide laptop (it
>>> works just fine after restart)? It used to
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:30:15AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 4.3.2016 v 23:36 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
> > I finally pushed the split of the systemd package to Rawhide and F24 today
> > [https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/systemd_package_split].
> > If you up
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:32:05AM -, Ralf Senderek wrote:
> > What would be proper other places to confirm the fingerprint?
> The following criteria might be reasonable:
> - a place that has authority, that people might trust.
> - a place that is hard to impersonate, that has some p
On 03/05/2016 07:13 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 23:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>> On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
>>>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Yeah, I think the best approach wou
psabata changed jplesnik's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Test-Output (f22)
to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-Output/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Somewhere like archive.org too maybe -- again totally separate
inrastructure + it could be used as a un-official 'official' hash
vault for checking.
On 03/07/2016 08:27 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 08:32:05AM -, Ra
Hi all,
Tomorrow, on Tuesday 2016-Mar-08 is an important day on the Fedora 24
schedule [1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all,
tomorrow is the Bodhi activation point [2]. That means that from
tomorrow all Fedora 24 packages must be submitted to updates-testing
and pass the relevant r
psabata changed owner of perl-Test-CPAN-Meta (f23) to 'jplesnik'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Test-CPAN-Meta/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproj
Change in package status over the last 168 hours
12 packages were orphaned
-
mingw-SDL2 [f23, f22, master, epel7, f24] was orphaned by kevin
MinGW Windows port of SDL2 cross-platform multimedia library
https://admin
On 03/05/2016 03:09 PM, Haïkel wrote:
2016-03-04 23:36 GMT+01:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
Hi,
I finally pushed the split of the systemd package to Rawhide and F24 today
[https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/systemd_package_split].
If you upgrade with dnf you should see som
psabata changed jplesnik's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-version (f24) to
'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-version/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
On Thursday, February 25, 2016 09:29:26 PM Ralf Senderek wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2016, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Which fingerprint? There is a number of keys
> >
> > Dennis
>
> The one you were referring to in your posting and which
> an ordinary user would verify with:
>
> gpg --list-keys --fin
Le 07/03/2016 12:34, Remi Collet a écrit :
> Hi
>
> I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18)
>
> I will also rebuild dependent packages:
>
> - fastd
> - usbguard
> - zeromq
and php-pecl-libsodium
Rebuild done.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http:/
On 7 March 2016 at 01:32, Ralf Senderek wrote:
>> What would be proper other places to confirm the fingerprint?
>
> The following criteria might be reasonable:
> - a place that has authority, that people might trust.
> - a place that is hard to impersonate, that has some protection
>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Does this mean we can install systemd into a base container without
> systemd-udev?
> And without systemd-container?
Yep. That's more or less the point of the change.
Zbyszek
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http:
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Hope that helps to find such places.
Not really. Everything above is subjective. In the past, when I have
looked for sites that meet such criteria no one agrees that the place
meets such criteria.
We put it in redhat.com and people who hate co
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
No images in this compose but not 24-20160306.n.0
No images in 24-20160306.n.0 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 67 of 78
ID: 7897Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso default_install@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedo
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 7 March 2016 at 01:32, Ralf Senderek wrote:
>>> What would be proper other places to confirm the fingerprint?
>>
>> The following criteria might be reasonable:
>> - a place that has authority, that people might trust.
>> -
psabata changed eseyman's 'watchbugzilla' permission on
perl-Data-Dumper-Concise (el6) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Data-Dumper-Concise/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists
psabata changed eseyman's 'watchcommits' permission on perl-Data-Dumper-Concise
(el6) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Data-Dumper-Concise/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.
Dear Fedora Developpers,
Due of a lack of time, I'm not able to take care of i7z package
anymore. There is 2 bz tickets opened agains't it that need intensive
work. I hope someone will take care of it.
Best regards,
Matthieu Saulnier
--
Autorité de Certification: http://casperlefantom.net/root.p
psabata changed owner of perl-Text-PDF (master) to 'eseyman'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-PDF/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/ad
psabata changed eseyman's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
(f23) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
psabata changed eseyman's 'approveacls' permission on perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
(f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fed
psabata changed eseyman's 'watchbugzilla' permission on perl-Text-MultiMarkdown
(f24) to 'Approved'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.f
psabata changed owner of perl-Text-MultiMarkdown (f23) to 'eseyman'
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Text-MultiMarkdown/
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fed
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160306.n.0
No images in Rawhide-20160306.n.0 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 64 of 78
ID: 7976Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso default_inst
On Mon, 2016-03-07 at 17:14 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
>
> Cloud raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> Cloud raw-xz x86_64
>
> No images in this compose but not 24-20160306.n.0
>
> No images in 24-20160306.n.0 but not this.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 67 of 78
Remi Collet schrieb am Mo., 7. März 2016, 16:11:
> Le 07/03/2016 12:34, Remi Collet a écrit :
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18)
> >
> > I will also rebuild dependent packages:
> >
> > - fastd
> > - usbguard
> > - zeromq
> and php-pecl-libsodium
>
>
34 matches
Mail list logo
