Le 26/02/2016 10:47, Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
> The glibc in Fedora rawhide and F24 is now split by
> language packs. We have over 180 supported languages
> in glibc, and those have been split into langpacks
> for transparent install and support via dnf.
I may understand the need.
But what abou
I'm looking for reviewers for:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315910
python-libarchive-c - Python interface to libarchive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315912
diffoscope - In-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cg
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 14:23 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> So splitting out networkd would be possible, but it's smallish (<1MB)
> and doesn't bring in extra deps.
It would, however, allow us to finally solve all incarnations of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313085 a
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
No images in this compose but not 24-20160307.n.0
Images in 24-20160307.n.0 but not this:
Cloud docker x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 61 of 78
ID: 8127Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso default_install
URL:
Hi folks! Time for a first F24 Alpha blocker bug status mail.
tl;dr work summary
--
QA folks:
* help figure out what's going on in #1315541
* ensure all Alpha validation tests are covered with recent composes
anaconda devs:
* review/merge https://github.com/rhinstaller/anaconda/p
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 06:42:31PM +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
> > lists.fedoraproject.org
> > regards
> I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
> for this one question :D
Note that with Hyperki
Missing expected images:
Cloud raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Cloud raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
No images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160307.n.0
No images in Rawhide-20160307.n.0 but not this.
No openQA tests found for compose.
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedora
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 19:48 +0100, gil wrote:
> i uploaded a patch for resolve the problem some time ago
> why you don't want use it?
OH! RIGHT! I missed that completely, some how! Sorry about that! Too
many FTBFS bugs today I guess.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproj
Il 08/03/2016 19:42, Ankur Sinha ha scritto:
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 18:55 +0100, gil wrote:
Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
lists.fedoraproject.org
regards
I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
for this one question :D
i
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 18:55 +0100, gil wrote:
> Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List java-devel@
> lists.fedoraproject.org
> regards
I was kinda hoping I wouldn't have to subscribe to another mailing list
for this one question :D
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
Sure, but you should use the Fedora Java Development List
java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
regards
.g
Il 08/03/2016 18:17, Ankur Sinha ha scritto:
Hiya,
Could someone with more knowledge of Java please help with this bug? If
it's because the package is outdated, I'll just retire it.
https://
Hiya,
Could someone with more knowledge of Java please help with this bug? If
it's because the package is outdated, I'll just retire it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307287
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
signature.as
On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 17:54 +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
Then it was probably broken by this update:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-606ca05253
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/li
Hi all,
Today's an important day on the Fedora 24 schedule[1], with several
significant cut-offs. First of all today is the Bodhi activation point
[2]. That means that from now all Fedora 24 packages must be submitted
to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements[3] before they
will be mar
3e455aec77a21d2e2ef0b52b3d561c79 ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012.tar.gz
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler/ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012.tar.gz/md5/3e455aec77a21d2e2ef0b52b3d561c79/ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedorapro
"Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Anyone has any suggestion?
>
> Does setting LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 help?
Yes. This makes it work. Thanks a lot.
Later, Juan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproj
On 03/08/2016 09:05 AM, Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi, Fedora developers!
>
> My name is Jun Aruga.
> I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat.
>
> I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
> I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore
> for 3
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:25:05PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Anyone has any suggestion?
Does setting LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=1 help?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-
On 03/08/2016 09:05 AM, Jun Aruga wrote:
> Hi, Fedora developers!
>
> My name is Jun Aruga.
> I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat.
>
> I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
> I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore
> for 3 ye
Hi
since last Monday or so, I have been able to run firefox over ssh
anymore. I thought it was my setup, but further investigation showed
that it is something specific to firefox.
My setup is a bit more convoluted than this, but I am able to do:
$ ssh -X localhost gnome-terminal
And it shows
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:11:52AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2016-03-07 at 15:56 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > > Does this mean we can install systemd into a base container without
> > > systemd-udev?
> >
Hi, Fedora developers!
My name is Jun Aruga.
I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat.
I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years.
I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore for
3 years.
Now I am preparing my first Fedora package for Ru
On 03/08/2016 12:20 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hello ,
Packages not signed in F24 are breaking copr builds , but I need copr
to test packages for F24 ...
What should we do ? to workaround this problem.
Thanks,
Wait for tomorrow. The packages should be signed starting today, as it
is the bodhi ac
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Hi
Hi Remi
>
> I'm upgrading libsodium from 1.0.5 (soname 13) to 1.0.8 (soname 18)
>
> I will also rebuild dependent packages:
>
> - fastd
> - usbguard
> - zeromq
I'll rebuild dnsdist which also depends on libsodium.
Kind regards,
Ruben
--
Hello ,
Packages not signed in F24 are breaking copr builds , but I need copr
to test packages for F24 ...
What should we do ? to workaround this problem.
Thanks,
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedorapr
Thank you all, I know F24 isn't stable, I'm installing it to try to help
tracking bugs.
Kind regards,
Gregorio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Gregorio . wrote:
> I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my
> system to Fedora 24.
>
> I used the following command: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever 24
>
> After this command the system downloads a lot of packages, but there is an
>
On Mo, 2016-03-07 at 15:56 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:21:38AM -0500, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> > Does this mean we can install systemd into a base container without
> > systemd-udev?
> > And without systemd-container?
> Yep. That's more or less the point of
On 8 Mar 2016 08:26, "Gregorio ." wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my
system to Fedora 24.
>
I suspect you're not aware of this, being new to Fedora, but Fedora 24
isn't released yet, and is still under development. Since you mention
you'r
Hello,
I'm new and I'm not an expert. I've Fedora 23 and I tried to upgrade my system
to Fedora 24.
I used the following command: # dnf system-upgrade download --releasever 24
After this command the system downloads a lot of packages, but there is an
error:
Error: Package system-python-libs-3
30 matches
Mail list logo
