pngquant license change to GPLv3+

pngquant-2.7.0-1 changed license from BSD with advertising to GPLv3+ . -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 24-20160509.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 7/72 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386) ID: 16723 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/16723 ID: 16725 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL:

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EXCEPTION REQUEST] librepo/libsolv/hawkey override in EPEL7

On Mon, 9 May 2016 09:52:00 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: > They would still conflict on files, since libsolv uses the same > soversion and have the same binary compatibility. I suppose if the > build was patched to use a different library name, it could work. Yes, that would be part of making it para

Re: A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance

Hey Richard, It looks like this one is definitely not related to MATE as it reportedly occurs in GNOME. I can't imagine gnome-software is the right place for the bug to live, though. Could you try guessing a component to move the issue to? udev, kernel, or fwupd, perhaps? Michael -- devel mailing

Re: A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance

Hey Richard, It looks like this one is definitely not related to MATE as it occurs in GNOME. Could you try guessing a component to move the issue to? udev, kernel, or fwupd, perhaps? Michael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists

[Test-Announce] Fedora 24 Cloud/Atomic test day tomorrow (2016-05-10)

Hi all, We are organizing a test day for Fedora Cloud/Atomic images tomorrow. [1] is the event page, more details about individual tests can be found at [2]. Please find some time in the to test one or more features, and submit back the results to the testdays application. Happy testing :)

RE: A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance

Well I have no problem with that at all, but at least you could just leave a comment about that it's on low propriety right now or maybe you are busy with something else, or that I should debug it myself instead of maybe waiting it to get fixed, that's what it's all about. Thanks. Date: Mon, 9

comps and spin-kickstarts migration this friday (2016-05-13)

Greetings. This friday (2016-05-13) at 16UTC we will be migrating: https://fedorahosted.org/comps/ https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/ to https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/ https://pagure.io/fedora-kickstarts/ With this migration we will be changing the workflow for changes to these repos

Re: A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance

Plus, I've been on annual PTO for the last 10 days. Its fair to say I basically ignore MATE bugs (typically the bugs were fixed upstream in the last two years, or the obsolete framework parts contribute to the misbehavior...) so unless there's a stacktrace that looks interesting or a lot of dupes i

Re: Review swaps

On 6 May 2016 17:24, "Jerry James" wrote: > > I've got another small pile of GAP packages that need reviews. These > are all pretty simple, and follow practices established for existing > GAP packages. Let me know what I can review for you in exchange. > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/05/2016 02:29 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2016-05-05 10:59, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> I would think that it requiring S3TC would be more of a blocker. But >> then again, maybe it's possible for someone to cook up their own game >> content that doesn't use compressed textures, but I

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/06/2016 05:30 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Tom Callaway > wrote: > > On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > Does this mean that most console emulators (i.e. > > NES/SNES/MasterSystem/Genesis emulators) ar

Re: Creating updates for Fedora 24

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'd like to push a glibc update to Fedora 24. It does not matter if it goes > into the release, it is just a collection of minor security fixes and > corrections to user-reported bugs. We are currently preparing an update for > Fedora 23 wi

2016-05-09 Fedora QA Devel Meeting Minutes

= #fedora-meeting-1: fedora-qadevel = Minutes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-09/fedora-qadevel.2016-05-09-14.00.html Minutes (text): https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-05-09/fedora-

Re: Creating updates for Fedora 24

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > I'd like to push a glibc update to Fedora 24. It does not matter if it goes > into the release, it is just a collection of minor security fixes and > corrections to user-reported bugs. We are currently preparing an update for > Fedora 23 w

Fedora Rawhide-20160509.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 29/72 (x86_64), 5/17 (i386) ID: 16624 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/16624 ID: 16626 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload

Creating updates for Fedora 24

I'd like to push a glibc update to Fedora 24. It does not matter if it goes into the release, it is just a collection of minor security fixes and corrections to user-reported bugs. We are currently preparing an update for Fedora 23 with similar content, and we want to avoid that an update to

Re: pidgin, was Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

On Mon, 9 May 2016, Jan Synacek wrote: I got a few of these warnings in the last few weeks and I'd like those to stop :) Is there any interest in supporting SILC? It's an old encryption chat protcol that I never used or never heard of someone using. Do the pidgin maintainers want to take the p

Re: Unannounced boost ABI break in Rawhide

On 08/05/16 21:51 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Sunday, 08 May 2016 at 16:59, Tomasz Torcz wrote: Hi, It seems that this boost build: * Tue May 03 2016 Jonathan Wakely - 1.60.0-6 - Rebuilt for GCC 6.1 (#1331983) broke ”rbd” from ceph-common-10.2.0-2.fc25.x86_64: $ /usr

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EXCEPTION REQUEST] librepo/libsolv/hawkey override in EPEL7

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 9 May 2016 13:44:41 +0100 > Peter Robinson wrote: > >> >> Sorry for delay for writing this. We wanted to provide latest DNF >> >> stack in EPEL7 which means we also need newer components like >> >> libsolv, hawkey, librepo, etc. >> >> >

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-06)

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> to answer the question about dates of FESCo elections: we have a >> schedule for it [1]. The exact dates of Elections are driven by Fedora >> release. We typically start a week after

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-06)

On 05/09/2016 09:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >> Hi, >> >> to answer the question about dates of FESCo elections: we have a >> schedule for it [1]. The exact dates of Elections are driven by Fedora >> release. We typically start a week after GA with p

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EXCEPTION REQUEST] librepo/libsolv/hawkey override in EPEL7

On Mon, 9 May 2016 13:44:41 +0100 Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Sorry for delay for writing this. We wanted to provide latest DNF > >> stack in EPEL7 which means we also need newer components like > >> libsolv, hawkey, librepo, etc. > >> > >> Some of those are in RHEL7.2 and unfortunately it's not t

Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainer - jkang

Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for this package maintainer is no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email addresses in FAS). If they're not int

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-06)

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi, > > to answer the question about dates of FESCo elections: we have a > schedule for it [1]. The exact dates of Elections are driven by Fedora > release. We typically start a week after GA with preparations; two > weeks after the GA we start wi

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-06)

Hi, to answer the question about dates of FESCo elections: we have a schedule for it [1]. The exact dates of Elections are driven by Fedora release. We typically start a week after GA with preparations; two weeks after the GA we start with Nominations period; etc... If a Fedora release slips, the

Re: A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance

Dne 9.5.2016 v 14:43 M.Hanny Sabbagh napsal(a): > So what can I do furthermore about this? > Thanks. Although it can be painful for you, there is pretty high chance that it is not priority for developer. Especially if it cannot be reproduced on his own hardware. Being pushy to maintainer is very

Re: 2016-05-09 @ 14:00 UTC - Fedora QA Devel Meeting

of the wiki page for this meeting: > > https://phab.qadevel.cloud.fedoraproject.org/w/meetings/20160509-fedoraqadevel/ > > Tim > > > Proposed Agenda > === > > Announcements and Information > - > - Please list announcements or

[EPEL-devel] Fwd: Reminder: please test Xfce 4.12 packages on EL-7

Reminder for those using (or planning to use) Xfce on EL-7. Please test Xfce 4.12 packages in epel-testing. Details are below. In the absence of adverse reports, I will push this to epel repo in next few days. Mukundan. Forwarded Message Subject: Reminder: please test Xfce 4

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EXCEPTION REQUEST] librepo/libsolv/hawkey override in EPEL7

>> Sorry for delay for writing this. We wanted to provide latest DNF >> stack in EPEL7 which means we also need newer components like libsolv, >> hawkey, librepo, etc. >> >> Some of those are in RHEL7.2 and unfortunately it's not that easy to >> get them updated: >> - librepo >> - libsolv >> - hawk

A Problem Regarding GNOME Software Maintenance

Hello Everyone. I am contacting this list in order to see what I can do more about this bug in GNOME software: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322259' The developer is just not responding on me, even after I tested what he requested, the bug report has been there for more than 40 d

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EXCEPTION REQUEST] librepo/libsolv/hawkey override in EPEL7

On 9 May 2016 at 02:38, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > Hi all, > > Sorry for delay for writing this. We wanted to provide latest DNF > stack in EPEL7 which means we also need newer components like libsolv, > hawkey, librepo, etc. > > Some of those are in RHEL7.2 and unfortunately it's not that easy to > g

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel5 (2016-05-09)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2016-05-09)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-05-09)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-09)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-05-09)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If y

Re: pidgin, was Re: Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-05-03)

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 3 May 2016, opensou...@till.name wrote: > >> libsilcorphan, cicku, nosnilmot 9 weeks ago > > >> Depending on: libsilc (12), status change: 2016-02-26 (9 weeks ago) >> pidgin (maintained by: jsynace

[Test-Announce] 2016-05-09 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 24 Blocker Review

# F24 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2016-05-09 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 5 proposed Final blockers to review. Please come join us and help us determine which of them are blockers. We'll be missing AdamW at least, so we will definite

[Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2016-05-09 Fedora QA Meeting

Hello, I propose to cancel today's QA meeting. We're somewhat out of people, Adam is on vacation, and both I and Petr have some chance of time slots conflicts. Probably the most important part is to find out the status of upcoming graphical upgrade and cloud test days. I'll email relevant people

[EPEL-devel] Re: [EXCEPTION REQUEST] librepo/libsolv/hawkey override in EPEL7

> Sorry for delay for writing this. We wanted to provide latest DNF > stack in EPEL7 which means we also need newer components like libsolv, > hawkey, librepo, etc. Delayed so much you've already pushed them to testing I see.I'd like to see those unpushed until a decision is made. This isn't "push