Koschei update

2016-05-17 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
TL;DR Koschei now supports targets other than rawhide (not enabled yet) and should correctly handle weak and rich deps. Full version: Last week Koschei [1] was updated to latest upstream release (1.6.1). The new version comes with one particularly interesting feature - Koschei is now able to trac

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Roberto Ragusa
On 05/17/2016 04:48 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > Sure. I always find annoying when there are two entities: > > something.conf > something.d/ > > so in order to expend the directory, I need to tab twice. I hope there > will be no repos.conf :-) Right. Wouldn't have been better to go with the foll

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:22 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >I can't recall Fedora shipping with a > mainline kernel. Ha, well that's obviously wrong. Often Fedora has rc's in alpha and ships with that released kernel. So never mind on that point! In any case it's up to the kernel team. I don't think a

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > >> I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x >> kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update. > > > There is more extensive testing performed before GA release th

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 17:44:43 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update. There is more extensive testing performed before GA release the

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 05/17/2016 05:25 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: I refuse the premise that the kernel team is going to release a 4.6.x kernel that isn't ready as a 0 day update. There is more extensive testing performed before GA release then there is in the update process hence what get's shipped in the GA relea

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window f

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: Your argument sounds like yum.repos.d would be the best name for the repo definitions that are recognised by the yum parser and other implementations for this format. More accurate and more distro agnostic would be system like rpm or npm etc >.repos.d

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Till Maas wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:58:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> > Nothing says that in the future, we couldn't handle other kinds. >> > Fundamentally, libsolv can process rpm-md/yum, susetags/

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Till Maas
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:58:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > Nothing says that in the future, we couldn't handle other kinds. > > Fundamentally, libsolv can process rpm-md/yum, susetags/yast2, hdlist2 > > (mdk), and helix repos. And those are j

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Chris Murphy
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > > On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: >> >> With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had >> to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The >> decision has been made to ship F2

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 05/17/2016 02:48 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: With a symlink /etc/yum.repos.d to it. And for other type repository's -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Kernel plans for Fedora 24

2016-05-17 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 03/16/2016 04:01 PM, Justin Forbes wrote: With the 4.5 kernel out and the merge window for 4.6 opened up, we had to make a decision on what the release kernel for F24 would be. The decision has been made to ship F24 with the 4.5 kernel with 4.6 available as an update once it is ready. Timi

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Lukas Zapletal
> >> /etc/repos.d is less typing. Yes, please! With a symlink /etc/yum.repos.d to it. > The .d suffix is a meaningful distinction. It denotes a drop-in directory > (where > anything placed in it is meant to be automatically picked up and used, > assuming > it is in the correct format). Sure.

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Jóhann B . Guðmundsson
On 05/17/2016 02:14 PM, Honza Šilhan wrote: there are a lot of good suggestions about the path name in the discussion. `/etc/distro.repos.d` probably wasn't the best chosen path so we've changed it to `/etc/repos.d` in the proposal. Moreover I've mentioned there possible path name alternatives

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

2016-05-17 Thread Honza Šilhan
> From: "Ted W." > > I'll jump on the /etc/repos.d bandwagon. It follows a convention > commonly found in lots of other configuration directories and I feel > it's much more concise and clear than /etc/distro.repos.d. > > I'm not sure I fully understand the rationale behind using > distros.repos

Fedora 24-20160517.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/60 (x86_64), 2/15 (i386) ID: 17916 Test: x86_64 Server-d

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: corsepiu

2016-05-17 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/16/2016 09:39 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> The Coin3 package has a serious bug[1] that was only recently uncovered >> > by GCC 6. >> > > The big question here is, whether this issue is a bug in Coin at all or > actually is a bug in G

Fedora 24 compose report: 20160517.n.0 changes

2016-05-17 Thread Fedora Branched Report
OLD: Fedora-24-20160516.n.0 NEW: Fedora-24-20160517.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 44 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 309 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 3.15 MiB Size of dropped packages:10.67 MiB

Fedora Rawhide-20160517.n.0 compose check report

2016-05-17 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 27/60 (x86_64), 3/15 (i386) ID: 17829 Test: x86_64 Atomic-b

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160517.n.0 changes

2016-05-17 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160516.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160517.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 31 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 15 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00