On Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:28:05 AM CEST Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes:
> PR> Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
> PR> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
>
> Why would you bump a three year old ticket for this?
Jason, because
I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you mean why don't
I like KDE? I don't have any dislike for KDE. I was simply suggesting
using another DE as a troubleshooting measure. Sometimes breakage is
confined to a particular one and switching to another will allow you to
work around or
Hello,
I wish to make a fedora rpm package from my open-source at
http://clownix.net. I am ready to change the licence to gpl if the
current cloonix rpl licence cannot be accepted in the fedora
distribution. Cloonix is an open source to create qemu-kvm machines
and connect them, it is provided as a
Hi,
during the meeting we were able to check the status with all the team
representatives and there is no know blocking issue, except the NO-GO
status as published at [1].
For more details please check the meeting minutes at [2][3].
Thanks all the participants on the meeting for coming and provid
Hi,
We have recently started updating all Fedoras to the latest stable
release of WebKitGTK+ in order to provide effective security support.
I'm pleased that so far we have had no bug reports related to these
updates.
Recently, FESCo wisely adopted a policy to ban stable release updates
that brea
The decision of the Fedora 24 Final Go/No-Go Meeting is NO-GO.
Due to a blocker bug [1] and subsequently missing Fedora 24 Final RC
compose it has been agreed on the Go/No-Go meeting to slip the Final
release of Fedora 24 for one week.
The next Go/No-Go meeting is planned on the next Thursday 2016
> "PR" == Pavel Raiskup writes:
PR> Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
PR> https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
Why would you bump a three year old ticket for this? Just open a new
one.
- J<
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.f
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 21466 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21466
ID: 21537 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fed
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz
wrote:
> W dniu 09.06.2016 o 00:18, gil pisze:
>
> I have no idea why but most of your mails end in my spam folder ;(
>
> Il 08/06/2016 21:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:07:26 +0200
>>> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>>>
>>
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 15/71 (x86_64), 5/16 (i386)
ID: 21360 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
OLD: Fedora-24-20160608.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160609.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 00:18:47 +0200
gil wrote:
> who did you of bad kde?
> regards
I'm not sure I understand the question, but perhaps you mean why don't
I like KDE? I don't have any dislike for KDE. I was simply suggesting
using another DE as a troubleshooting measure. Sometimes breakage is
confi
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:07 PM, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > See:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338054
> >
> > Pushing a reasonable version of keepassx for f24 is apparently an
> accepted
> > freeze exception,
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160608.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160609.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 4
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 61
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 748.06 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> I maintain a package which comes with some benchmarking tools. I
> would like to package these, but they have very generic names like
> "boot-benchmark", "analysis". Also the tools are very specialized --
> you would only want them if
I maintain a package which comes with some benchmarking tools. I
would like to package these, but they have very generic names like
"boot-benchmark", "analysis". Also the tools are very specialized --
you would only want them if you already know you need them.
I wonder if people have opinions o
On 2016-06-09, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 09/06/16 08:02 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Think about it: you can't build 32-bit software **at all** unless you
>>> install glibc-devel.i686, not even just "int main() { }" with no
>>> headers at all.
>>>
>>That'
Hi.
My name is Lumir Balhar and I am new member of Python maintenance team
in Red Hat. I will work on porting Python packages to Python 3.
I have no previous experience with RPM packages.
My first review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344245
Have a nice day. Lumir
--
d
The bug was rejected as a blocker but instead it has a suggestion to be a
freeze exception.
You should use official application to properly refile it as a freeze
exception, there's no tracker bug number in the blocks box. FE has its own
tracker.
https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs
- Click
Thanks to Vit for the link, I'd like to see the discussion in:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/312
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
W dniu 09.06.2016 o 00:18, gil pisze:
I have no idea why but most of your mails end in my spam folder ;(
Il 08/06/2016 21:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:07:26 +0200
Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
Any ideas (other than "switch to F24/Ubuntu/Debian/Umbaumba" ones)?
the lates
W dniu 08.06.2016 o 21:15, Kevin Fenzi pisze:
> On Wed, 8 Jun 2016 21:07:26 +0200
> Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
>> I used 4.7-rc0.git3 kernel for few days. In the morning I did an
>> update to fresh rawhide and then fork() stopped forking.
>>
>> Thunderbird was crashing on start, Chrome refused to
On 09/06/16 08:02 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 08/06/16 15:43 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Also, since gcc%{?_isa} **doesn't work** then yes, not using %_isa for
gcc seems sensible! :-)
Why both gcc.i686 and gcc.x86_64
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 08:02:55AM +, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > Think about it: you can't build 32-bit software **at all** unless you
> > install glibc-devel.i686, not even just "int main() { }" with no
> > headers at all.
> >
> That's because gcc.x86_64 accepts -m32 but cannot produce 32-bit
> exe
On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 08/06/16 15:43 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>On 2016-06-08, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>>> Also, since gcc%{?_isa} **doesn't work** then yes, not using %_isa for
>>> gcc seems sensible! :-)
>>>
>>Why both gcc.i686 and gcc.x86_64 are available in the x86_64 repo
25 matches
Mail list logo
