Rex Dieter writes:
> I'd suggest you track library sonames instead of using globs as is current:
> %files libs
> %{_libdir}/libasprintf.so.*
> %{_libdir}/libgettextpo.so.*
> ...
>
> using something like:
> %files libs
> %{_libdir}/libasprintf.so.0*
> %{_libdir}/libgettextpo.so.0*
> ...
> instead.
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 11:01 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> > Leaking session processes have been a perennial problem that
> > we have been battling forever (gconf, ibus, pulseaudio, the list
> goes
> > on...). And they are causing ac
on release validation testing, see:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
>
> Aren't they named incorrectly? Looking at spins [1] and isos [2]
> they're using the nightly naming scheme (24-20160611.n.0) rather than
> 24-1.1 like I'd expect.
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 3/78 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 21931 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21931
ID: 21938 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_se
ect.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Aren't they named incorrectly? Looking at spins [1] and isos [2]
they're using the nightly naming scheme (24-20160611.n.0) rather than
24-1.1 like I'd expect.
[1]
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/24/Spins/x86_64/iso/
[2]
http://dl.f
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 21841 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21841
ID: 21914 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fed
Daiki Ueno wrote:
> I am very sorry that the recent build of gettext-0.19.8-1 package, which
> has already been pushed to F24, had an unintentional soname bump of
> libgettextpo
I'd suggest you track library sonames instead of using globs as is current:
%files libs
%{_libdir}/libasprintf.so.*
%
OLD: Fedora-24-20160610.n.0
NEW: Fedora-24-20160611.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 17/79 (x86_64), 6/17 (i386)
ID: 21726 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/21726
ID: 21727
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160610.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160611.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:10
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 4
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 43
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.49 MiB
Size of dropped packages
On 06/10/2016 09:26 AM, Davide Olivieri wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> My name is Davide Olivieri, I've been a Linux user for some years and
> lately I became particularly interested in Fedora and its community. I
> hold the RHCSA certification and have knowledge of bash scripting.
>
> I would like to
Daiki Ueno writes:
> I am very sorry that the recent build of gettext-0.19.8-1 package, which
> has already been pushed to F24, had an unintentional soname bump of
> libgettextpo that affected the following packages:
I was able to unpush the update. Sorry for the noise (though it is
still the c
Hello,
I am very sorry that the recent build of gettext-0.19.8-1 package, which
has already been pushed to F24, had an unintentional soname bump of
libgettextpo that affected the following packages:
fcitx
gtranslator
kdesdk-thumbnailers
poxml
May I ask to rebuild those?
Thanks,
--
Daiki Ueno
-
14 matches
Mail list logo
