[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL-ANNOUNCE Major Nginx update for EL7, EL6, EL5

2016-07-02 Thread Robert Scheck
Hello Jamie, On Sat, 02 Jul 2016, Jamie Nguyen wrote: > One notable feature is HTTP/2 (except EL5, where OpenSSL is too old). I'm not sure if it helps in this specific case, but in general there is (additionally) the same version of OpenSSL for EL-5 available like EL-6 is shipping:

[Bug 1343521] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.206 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343521 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1343521] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.206 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343521 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1175420 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1175420=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

Review swap?

2016-07-02 Thread Ben Rosser
Hi, Is anyone interested in a review swap for cmap-resources ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350260)? This should be pretty straightforward, I'd be willing to take any small package in return. Note that this is a rename of several other packages (cmap-cns1-6, cmap-gb1-5,

[Bug 1343521] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.206 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343521 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora

[Bug 1343521] perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.206 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343521 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.204 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[OT] Re: [OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-07-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Sex, 2016-07-01 at 21:40 -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Bruno Wolff III said: > > > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 00:48:14 +0200, > >  Michael Scherer wrote: > > > > > > So that's rather fast to explain. Libero.it use this SPF record: > > Isn't SPF

[Bug 1352246] New: perl-Devel-Pragma-1.1.0 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352246 Bug ID: 1352246 Summary: perl-Devel-Pragma-1.1.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Devel-Pragma Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: [OT] Tim, Gil, et. al. (e-mail address settings)

2016-07-02 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Joel Rees wrote: > To keep this off-list as much as possible, the rant is here: > > http://reiisi.blogspot.com/2016/07/to-gil-tim-fedora-et-al.html > > (The blame lies elsewhere. I wish I had the network and social cred to > get a real

Re: multi-CPU optimization inside a distribution

2016-07-02 Thread Solomon Peachy
On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 02:08:48PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > So the thing is, I'm genuinely curious why you would want to run a > desktop OS on either architecture. For the same reason Fedora puts out releases targeting those architechures? :) I'm not wedded to any particular hardware

[EPEL-devel] Major Nginx update for EL7, EL6, EL5

2016-07-02 Thread Jamie Nguyen
Hi, As previously agreed on epel-devel and by the EPEL Steering Committee, I have pushed Nginx 1.10.x packages to epel-testing on EL7, EL6, and EL5. This resolves numerous security flaws that were too difficult to backport to ancient, unmaintained versions of Nginx. These updates will sit in

[Bug 1351354] amavisd-new: additional systemd hardening

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351354 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2016-07-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 481 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 244 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 110

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2016-07-02 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 377 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-6828 chicken-4.9.0.1-4.el6 360 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 354

[Bug 1300870] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300870 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1300870] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300870 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fusioninventory-agent-2.3.1

[Bug 1349202] perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349202 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1349202] perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349202 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-Junctions-0.00

[Bug 1300870] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300870 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1300870] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300870 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fusioninventory-agent-2.3.1

[Bug 1349202] perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349202 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-autobox-Junctions-0.00

[Bug 1349202] perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349202 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

Re: Is bodhi's stable request policy confused?

2016-07-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sat, 2 Jul 2016 07:14:54 -0700 Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > The web UI would not let me push my update to stable despite having > plenty of karma > (https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/fish-2.3.0-2.fc24). The > options were "Edit" and "Unpush". > > I was able to request

[Bug 1331528] Please build perl-Unicode-CaseFold for EPEL

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331528 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Unicode-CaseFold-1.00-6.el6.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1331528] Please build perl-Unicode-CaseFold for EPEL

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331528 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1300870] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300870 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1300870] fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300870 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- fusioninventory-agent-2.3.18-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1349202] perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349202 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1349202] perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349202 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-autobox-Junctions-0.002-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1349212] perl-Test-Moose-More-0.038 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349212 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1349212] perl-Test-Moose-More-0.038 is available

2016-07-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349212 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Moose-More-0.038-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Fedora Rawhide-20160702.n.0 compose check report

2016-07-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Minimal raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 21/78 (x86_64), 2/16 (i386) ID: 24418 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL:

Re: autoconf test for deprecated readdir_r

2016-07-02 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Qui, 2016-06-30 at 17:42 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/30/2016 05:38 PM, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > > > > Cut & paste example code solution from lvm2: > > > > #if !defined(__GLIBC__) || (__GLIBC__ < 2) || ((__GLIBC__ == 2) && > > (__GLIBC_MINOR__ < 23)) > > /* readdir_r is

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160702.n.0 changes

2016-07-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160701.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160702.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 72 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.27 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00

Broken dependencies: perl-Algorithm-Permute

2016-07-02 Thread buildsys
perl-Algorithm-Permute has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Algorithm-Permute-0.12-21.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386:

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2016-07-02 Thread buildsys
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages

2016-07-02 Thread Tomas Orsava
- Original Message - > So, the "problem" with --majorver-provides occurs when either of the > two conditions are true: > > * There's no dependency on a specific version of the Python ABI > ("python(abi) = X.Y") in the modules > * There's more than one package providing a python

Re: %python_provide question

2016-07-02 Thread Igor Gnatenko
I would like to fix %python-provide. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1351136 I mentioned PIL case there as well. -Igor Gnatenko On Jul 2, 2016 11:27 AM, "Sandro Mani" wrote: > Hi > > I'm looking at modernizing the python-pillow spec and have a question >

%python_provide question

2016-07-02 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'm looking at modernizing the python-pillow spec and have a question about %python_provide: The python{2,3}-pillow also provide the legacy python{,2,3}-imaging names, how should this be handled with %python_provide? I.e. %package -n python2-pillow %{?python_provide:%python_provide

Re: Anyone know how to contact maintainer Salimma?

2016-07-02 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi Avram, Let's continue this in Bugzilla. Best regards, - Michel On Sat, Jul 2, 2016, 01:08 Avram Lubkin wrote: > Thanks Haïkel. I'll take you up on that if needed, but assuming I don't > hear from him soon, I'll put in a request to take over the package. Sphinx > sees