Re: Please Mark bz#1164414 for EPEL7

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 8:16 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 02:07 +, Christopher wrote: > > Ah, my mistake. I was under the impression that it was missing, > > because > > related to gnome-python2-desktop ( > >

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On Sáb, 2016-08-20 at 11:24 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 16:19:08 +, >   opensou...@till.name wrote: > > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for sure > >

Re: Review swap: Grand Hotel and Molot fonts

On 20/08/16 04:53 PM, gil wrote: > > > Il 21/08/2016 01:41, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto: >> Hello team, >> >> I am looking for reviewers on those fonts needed for Fedora Magazine >> template: >> >> Grand Hotel (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606) >> Molot

Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

Kai Engert wrote: > I've just used f24 qupzilla to access a site with a relevant > configuration. I'm using the suggested configuration on my system, and the > site loads fine. > > So apparently QT uses one of the fixed underlying libraries. QupZilla is a bit special in that it uses QtWebEngine,

Fedora 25-20160820.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 14/89 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 28853 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/28853 ID: 28854 Test:

Fedora Rawhide-20160820.n.1 compose check report

Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 54/75 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 28751 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL:

Re: Review swap: Grand Hotel and Molot fonts

Il 21/08/2016 01:41, Luya Tshimbalanga ha scritto: Hello team, I am looking for reviewers on those fonts needed for Fedora Magazine template: Grand Hotel (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606) Molot (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368611) I have contacted the

Review swap: Grand Hotel and Molot fonts

Hello team, I am looking for reviewers on those fonts needed for Fedora Magazine template: Grand Hotel (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606) Molot (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368611) I have contacted the author of Molot fonts who okay for the licensing. Thanks

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core On i386: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core On armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-12.fc25.noarch requires root-core

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

Re: aarch64 machine for packagers?

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Sadly, I don't know of any right now... but we hope to stand some up > soon. We have new aarch64 builder hardware (which will also run arm7 in > vms faster than our existing arm7 builders), and hopefully it will be > online

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On 20/08/16 09:19, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: aarch64 machine for packagers?

On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 15:02:32 -0600 Jerry James wrote: > One of my packages has a crashing test suite on aarch64: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367571 > > I'd like to debug the issue, but do not have access to any aarch64 > hardware. I looked at >

aarch64 machine for packagers?

One of my packages has a crashing test suite on aarch64: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367571 I'd like to debug the issue, but do not have access to any aarch64 hardware. I looked at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers, but those armv7

Unresponsive maintainer: mrceresa

We have bug in InsightToolKit[0] for > half year that it doesn't work properly on ARM, but maintainer doesn't respond neither to bugzilla nor to email. It's blocking me from importing 4 packages as all of them failing on ARM due to ITK bug. Probably it just needs update, probably some

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:53:52 +0200 (CEST) > "Francisco J. Tsao Santin" wrote: > > > > supervisor orphan, arg, jlaska, tzero 0 > > > weeks ago > > > > I've just take supervisor (I use it), but co-maintainers

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On Sat, 20 Aug 2016 18:53:52 +0200 (CEST) "Francisco J. Tsao Santin" wrote: > On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, opensou...@till.name wrote: > > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On Sat, 20 Aug 2016, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure [...] > supervisor orphan, arg, jlaska, tzero 0 weeks ago I've just

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Moose (perl-Moose-2.1805-1.fc25). "Update to 2.1805 (..more)"

From 4c9146587511914f97b03768a0bbe0b5365adcfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:53:58 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.1805 - New upstream release 2.1805 - BR: perl(MooseX::NonMoose) and perl(Specio) for further test coverage - Use

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Moose (perl-Moose-2.1805-1.fc26). "Update to 2.1805 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Moose.git/commit/?h=perl-Moose-2.1805-1.fc26=4c9146587511914f97b03768a0bbe0b5365adcfd -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel7 (2016-08-20)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

[EPEL-devel] Orphaned Packages in epel6 (2016-08-20)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

I'm going to maintain these sagitter: gnustep-base, qwtplot3d, libavc1394 On 08/20/2016 06:19 PM, opensou...@till.name wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package

Re: Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 16:19:08 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:

Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-08-20)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in branched (2016-08-20)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2016-08-20)

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Moose (f25). "Update to 2.1805 (..more)"

From 4c9146587511914f97b03768a0bbe0b5365adcfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:53:58 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.1805 - New upstream release 2.1805 - BR: perl(MooseX::NonMoose) and perl(Specio) for further test coverage - Use

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Moose (master). "Update to 2.1805 (..more)"

From 4c9146587511914f97b03768a0bbe0b5365adcfd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 16:53:58 +0100 Subject: Update to 2.1805 - New upstream release 2.1805 - BR: perl(MooseX::NonMoose) and perl(Specio) for further test coverage - Use

pghmcfc uploaded Moose-2.1805.tar.gz for perl-Moose

c8632a127c0602b65f851f4e2de9f3ca Moose-2.1805.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Moose/Moose-2.1805.tar.gz/md5/c8632a127c0602b65f851f4e2de9f3ca/Moose-2.1805.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue

On Aug 20, 2016 4:50 PM, "Andrew Lutomirski" wrote: > > > How about ordinary earlyprintk to serial? > > Try booting with nokaslr, though. There was a bug, now fixed upstream (I think) that broke AMD early microcode if kaslr was used. You would likely trigger it only on systems

Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue

On Aug 20, 2016 4:38 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga > wrote: > > On 19/08/16 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 18:53 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > >>> On 19/08/16

Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 11:16 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > On 19/08/16 08:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 18:53 -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >>> On 19/08/16 12:58 AM, Kamil Paral wrote: > Possibly as I boot the livemedia from the plain old

Re: Please Mark bz#1164414 for EPEL7

On Sat, 2016-08-20 at 02:07 +, Christopher wrote: > Ah, my mistake. I was under the impression that it was missing, > because > related to gnome-python2-desktop ( > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177390) which > contains gnome-python2-gnomekeyring. Maybe gnome-python2-desktop can