The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
551 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
313 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
76
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Kde raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 5/85 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20160908.n.0):
ID: 33357 Test: x86_64 universal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285807
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
slic3r-1.2.9-8.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285807
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|slic3r-1.2.9-8.fc24
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 10:44 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Fedora Infrastructure currently maintains two sites for general open
> source code hosting: fedorahosted.org and pagure.io.
>
> Fedorahosted.org was established in late 2007 using Trac for issues and
> wiki pages, Fedora
We still have a few miscellaneous things hosted in:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git
since fedorahosted is dying next February, what should we do with them?
Is this the point where we should finally decide whether to use
Phabricator's built-in repository support or Pagure for this
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting
# Date: 2016-09-12
# Time: 15:00 UTC
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto)
# Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net
Greetings testers!
It's meeting time again on Monday! We haven't had a meeting for a while
and everyone should be
# F25 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2016-09-12
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Hi folks! We currently have 9 proposed Beta blockers and 9 proposed
Final blockers to review (whew - this might be a long one).
If you have time this weekend, you can take a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372494
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374879
Bug ID: 1374879
Summary: perl-Config-Grammar-1.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Config-Grammar
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374879
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374879
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1199671
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1199671=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374879
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-Config-Grammar-1.11 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
On 09/09/2016 10:50 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:22:19AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 09/09/2016 08:24 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>>> There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API
>>> changed in a backwards-incompatible way.
>>
>> If they broke
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 17:45 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
>
> Let me know if you think I should submit this upstream somewhere.
Probably to gnome-shell on bugzilla.gnome.org , I guess.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin .
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372504
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372498
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372498
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.40-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372492
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372510
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sys-Syslog-0.35-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372503
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-3.015-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372504
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372503
Bug 1372503 depends on bug 1372505, which changed state.
Bug 1372505 Summary: perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372505
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372492
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Config-Model-Tester-2.057-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372503
Bug 1372503 depends on bug 1372504, which changed state.
Bug 1372504 Summary: perl-Sereal-Decoder-3.015 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372504
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372505
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372510
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372505
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Sereal-Encoder-3.015-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372503
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370801
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Redis-1.991-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372985
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372982
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370801
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372982
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-IO-Interactive-1.022-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372985
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Module-Metadata-Changes-2.11-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
On 09/09/2016 04:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 15:53 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
>> Just a couple of smallish things after upgrading (via dnf) from F23 to
>> F24 a couple of months ago:
>>
>> 1. deja-dup gui:
>>
>> one has to deselect then reselect the Overview option
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Adam Williamson wrote:
2. fingerprint identification:
The laptop has a fingerprint reader and it works fine. However
I prefer not to use it. The user set up specifies that fingerprint login
is disabled.
However whenever I am asked for a password the
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 11:00:21PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If it requires actions from releng, then it's system-wide change. But
> it's not about changing existing process of building distro, it's just
> bugfixing releng tools.
>
> So I'm not sure.
>
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:38 PM,
If it requires actions from releng, then it's system-wide change. But
it's not about changing existing process of building distro, it's just
bugfixing releng tools.
So I'm not sure.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:38 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2016-09-09 at
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 15:53 -0400, Roger Wells wrote:
> Just a couple of smallish things after upgrading (via dnf) from F23 to
> F24 a couple of months ago:
>
> 1. deja-dup gui:
>
> one has to deselect then reselect the Overview option in order
> to be offered the "Backup Now" option.
>
Just a couple of smallish things after upgrading (via dnf) from F23 to
F24 a couple of months ago:
1. deja-dup gui:
one has to deselect then reselect the Overview option in order
to be offered the "Backup Now" option.
The details option in the progress dialog will only display
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016 08:37:19 +0200
Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Kevin, help me please with cleanup:
>
> [ignatenkobrain@people02 ~][PROD]$ rm -rf
> /home/fedora/ignatenkobrain/public_git/*
> rm: cannot remove
>
ok. With excellent help from walters we got the atomic updates composes
working again and everything has now pushed out. (Although
fedora-24-updates-testing just pushed out so it will take it a few to
mirror).
So, all the updates/updates-testing repos should now have weak deps.
Can folks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373678
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-CPAN-Uploader-0.103013-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373911
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Inline-Filters-0.18-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See
On 09/09/2016 07:37 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Friday, 09 September 2016 at 18:22, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 09/09/2016 08:24 AM, Jerry James wrote:
There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API
changed in a backwards-incompatible way.
If they broke
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Next-1.16-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-Next-1.16-1.fc25
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 10:22:19AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/09/2016 08:24 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API
> > changed in a backwards-incompatible way.
>
> If they broke ABI, why wasn't the soname bumped?
>
> > If the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-File-Next-1.16-1.fc25
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346513
--- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-File-Next-1.16-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
On Friday, 09 September 2016 at 18:22, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/09/2016 08:24 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> > There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API
> > changed in a backwards-incompatible way.
>
> If they broke ABI, why wasn't the soname bumped?
>
> > If the
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-09-09)
===
Meeting started by kalev at 16:00:26 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-09-09/fesco.2016-09-09-16.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On 09/09/2016 08:24 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API
> changed in a backwards-incompatible way.
If they broke ABI, why wasn't the soname bumped?
> If the suitesparse maintainer does not object, I would also like to
> fix something I
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48978
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48978/0001-Ticket-48978-Fine-tune-error-severity-levels-part-1.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2016-09-09 3:25 GMT-06:00, Florian Weimer :
> I would like to build (S)RPMs directly from a Git repository (which
> contains the .spec file in the top-level directory). This is for a
> CI-style project, with a quick release cycle.
>
Tito can help you:
Hi,
here is the latest correction to the changelog fix, in fact it is
Thierry's version of teh fix which simplified the logic a bit
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48766/0001-PATCH-use-a-consumer-maxcsn-only-as-anchor-if-suppli.patch
Ludwig
On 05/23/2016 03:06 PM, Ludwig
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 01:27:54PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * Node.js 4.x and 6.x both *strictly* require functionality from OpenSSL
> > 1.0.2
> > and cannot run (or indeed build) against OpenSSL 1.0.1. Currently, both
> > EPEL 6
> > and EPEL 7 have 1.0.1 in their buildroots. I am not
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 5:25 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> I would like to build (S)RPMs directly from a Git repository (which
> contains the .spec file in the top-level directory). This is for a
> CI-style project, with a quick release cycle.
>
> I have a Lua script fragment
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 16:54 +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
Problem with tito as it doesn't really do proper archive for
build/release and doesn't work properly in many cases:
1. Version is specified in spec -> all builds will be unordered.
Example: Version: 2.0.0 -> 2.0.0-1.git.tree-ish
I don't have
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 12/92 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160908.n.0):
ID: 33211 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/33211
ID: 33232
Problem with tito as it doesn't really do proper archive for
build/release and doesn't work properly in many cases:
1. Version is specified in spec -> all builds will be unordered.
Example: Version: 2.0.0 -> 2.0.0-1.git.tree-ish
2. Replaces archive. Source: https://.../%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz is
= Proposed System Wide Change: DNF 2.0 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DNF-2.0
Change owner(s):
* Jan Silhan
* Michal Luscon
* Igor Gnatenko
DNF rebase to version 2.0.
== Detailed Description ==
DNF-2.0 is the next upcoming major version of DNF package manager.
Unfortunately, it
On Fri, 2016-09-09 at 11:25 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
I would like to build (S)RPMs directly from a Git repository (which
contains the .spec file in the top-level directory). This is for a
CI-style project, with a quick release cycle.
I have a Lua script fragment which generates a proper
[This message BCC'd to affected maintainers.]
A new version of tbb has been released. With this release, the
license changes from "GPLv2 with exceptions" to "ASL 2.0".
There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API
changed in a backwards-incompatible way. Therefore, I
From 94aebfad82e5520ce67c43806afc013ed0c8d0af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:33:19 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.805
- New upstream release 1.805
- Fixed bug in MCE::Queue (GH#4)
- Improved support for running MCE with Tk; added Tk
From 1c9406a351044126790bb542bcfd2c1e16885c5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:27:41 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-MCE.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4
From 5cbe115114507326bf88220f4c6c8871788d0b53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2016 17:50:22 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.706
- New upstream release 1.706
- Time::HiRes sleep resolution is 15 milliseconds on Windows and Cygwin;
adjusted timeout
From bd2e370b7ed93d10894e4b414093462a364ec033 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 14:13:44 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.22 rebuild
---
perl-MCE.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-MCE.spec
From 36bf73d1cee055bf36e3cf138326252351dc6f2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 11:58:13 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.800
- New upstream release 1.800
- Fixed dequeue (count) in MCE::Queue for standalone mode
- On Windows, improved stablity
From 7cd33775f53ec7bd752c1a21001caa98d73dd3f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 13:31:05 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.708
- New upstream release 1.708
- Improved import routine in MCE Models and MCE::Subs; this resolves an issue
where
From e1233268adb14c1af1ecd81b3a6c4b33d641fd0b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:16:58 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.803
- New upstream release 1.803
- Re-enabled Sereal 3.008+ for Perl < v5.12.0, if available
- Optimized dequeue methods in
From 94aebfad82e5520ce67c43806afc013ed0c8d0af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 09:33:19 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.805
- New upstream release 1.805
- Fixed bug in MCE::Queue (GH#4)
- Improved support for running MCE with Tk; added Tk
From 44f0546968a08f4d3a39a6f86e28bc32b93889ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 10:27:26 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.802
- New upstream release 1.802
- Default to Storable for serialization in Perl less than v5.12.0;
Sereal 3.008+, if
From 76e08bfe1244cb1a065634a1a7a0893ce69ae157 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:51:05 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.804
- New upstream release 1.804
- Removed the sleep statement in MCE->restart_worker
- Added FCGI::ProcManager
From 97a09593f16fab6bd16d4b97983dbd95f8127fbf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:56:19 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.707
- New upstream release 1.707
- Fixed logic when workers exit; improved reliability on Windows
- Applied
From c245315fc5ae2c250c658bc172df630668668959 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 07:59:41 +0200
Subject: Perl 5.24 rebuild
---
perl-MCE.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/perl-MCE.spec
From 68a931fb9c6cb1c8c2be14b7df9fbd40a87a69df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2016 15:25:01 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.801
- New upstream release 1.801
- Fixed race condition in Queue->await
- MCE 1.801 is stable on all supported platforms
-
From d3810b40442cc8aab0ff2826e1fa8d9abb33763c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 13:35:30 +
Subject: Update to 1.703
- New upstream release 1.703
- Completed IPC optimizations for 1.7
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-MCE.spec | 6 +-
From 28638ad2bb8b2208bc01e5b5d263071a78c0297a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 12:26:44 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.705
- New upstream release 1.705
- Bumped version for Test::More to 0.88
- BR:/R: perl(Sereal) where available
---
.gitignore
From d2284c0d4116bb308348b3f0c9ea248dcf536672 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dennis Gilmore
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 04:14:14 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
---
perl-MCE.spec | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
From a09360852bf8fa108e85d1735f6784ac9386cf4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:46:38 +
Subject: Update to 1.702
---
.gitignore | 1 +
MCE-1.700-provides.patch | 108 +
From 679710953c169b389a0590edabc8146af6effb0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 14:57:49 +0100
Subject: Update to 1.704
- New upstream release 1.704
BUG FIXES
- Fixed restart on the Windows platform, bug introduced in 1.700
- Reached
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit)
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.i686 requires
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 25 Branched 20160909.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Christopher Meng wrote:
> 100 is not enough at all, even .
100 is enough for all practical purposes. Even kdelibs3, which has had no
upstream release for 8 years, is only at -75. And in the unlikely event you
really reach 99, you can go to 99.1, 99.2, …
> Since efl has higher version, just
On 09/09/16 14:39, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
Dear list,
There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version usage.
Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
It wouldn't be that difficult
W dniu 09.09.2016 o 14:25, gil pisze:
>> Could we learn anything from this? Fedora is not a rolling
>> distribution, but the guidelines are. Would it be a good idea to
>> actually provide versions of the guidelines? To track the last version
>> checked in the packages?
>>
>> If not for anything
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Alec Leamas wrote:
> Dear list,
>
>
> There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version usage.
> Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
>
> The basic package lifecycle is that it is reviewed to current
Il 09/09/2016 14:13, Alec Leamas ha scritto:
Dear list,
There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version
usage. Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
The basic package lifecycle is that it is reviewed to current
standards, and after that start
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374686
--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1199450
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1199450=edit
Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374686
--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patches were not touched. All were applied properly
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374686
--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Patching or scratch build for perl-PDF-Create-1.34 failed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374686
Bug ID: 1374686
Summary: perl-PDF-Create-1.35 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-PDF-Create
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374685
Bug ID: 1374685
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI-0.15 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-CHI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Dear list,
There is an ongoing thread in debian-devel on their Standards-Version
usage. Reading this, it strikes me that Fedora lacks this info.
The basic package lifecycle is that it is reviewed to current standards,
and after that start lagging from the actual standards. To which extent
In DNF CI we use rpm-gitoverlay[0], but due to RPM we have to prepare
archive from git, replace path for %(auto)setup, and some other magic,
so you can't use it as is in Fedora. But you can easily use it with
COPR as you don't have to follow all guidelines.
When I deal with one project I just do:
Il 09/09/2016 11:46, Sandro Mani ha scritto:
Hi
I need the following packages reviewed to update licensecheck and
perl-String-Copyright:
perl-Path-Iterator-Rule -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373244
perl-Number-Range - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374642
Hi
I need the following packages reviewed to update licensecheck and
perl-String-Copyright:
perl-Path-Iterator-Rule -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373244
perl-Number-Range - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374642
Happy to review in exchange.
Sandro
--
devel
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo