Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 09:52 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang > wrote: > > This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my > > laptop: > > [fedora] > > name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch > >

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 21:43:21 -0500 Bowen Wang wrote: > Hi Stan, > I am not sure if I know what you are saying, can you explain it again? > Thanks. I wasn't really paying attention to the conversation, but it sounded like you wanted to have rawhide on your machine.

Re: Resultsdb v2.0 - API docs

the id, so it's available in the end, at report time). We are going to use something like `uuid.uuid3("OpenQA in Fedora", "Build Fedora-Rawhide-20160928.n.0")` (pseudocode to some extent), to create the same group UUID for the same build. This approach can be easily repli

Bind update (CVE-2016-2776)?

Could someone with sufficient access please spin up an update of bind for F-24 and other flavours of Fedora. That CVE looks like a pretty serious DoS. This has already been fixed in RHEL. Thanks, -- Bojan ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1375103] perl-App-Daemon missing in EPEL7

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375103 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

Hi Stan, I am not sure if I know what you are saying, can you explain it again? Thanks. Bowen On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 9:12 PM, stan wrote: > On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:30 +0800 > Christopher Meng wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

Hi Chris, I have clicked the address https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=fedora-rawhide=x86_64 I got the following stuff: # repo = rawhide arch = x86_64 country = US country = CA

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 09:52:30 +0800 Christopher Meng wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang > wrote: > > This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my > > laptop: > > [fedora] > > name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch >

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 1:31 AM, Bowen Wang wrote: > This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my > laptop: > [fedora] > name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch > failovermethod=priority >

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 570 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 332 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 95

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 840 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 689 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849 sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 332

[Bug 1380211] New: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380211 Bug ID: 1380211 Summary: perl-Clownfish-CFC-0.6.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Clownfish-CFC Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1380212] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380212 Bug ID: 1380212 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 12:31 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote: > I think maybe it is just a coincidence, after I run the > dnf upgrade --refrsh > at the first time, the mirror I am using just got the latest update. So > I can upgrade my system when running the second time. To be clear, the mirror system

Re: Orphaning avogadro

Antonio Trande wrote: > I'm going to maintain Avogadro. Thanks! I see you already addressed all the open bugs, that was quick. :-) Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 1376996] perl-DateTime-1.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376996 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA

Re: Non-numeric lz4 package version

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 09:05:13PM +0200, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > You do rsplit() by the '-'. Right part is R.A. you remove arch and get > release. Ah got it, because the release field can't contain a '-'. > What exactly you want to do? RPM and DNF have proper --queryformat. I don't have the RPM

[389-devel] please review: Ticket 48978 - convert slapi_log_error() to a variadic macro

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48978/ https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48978/0001-Ticket-48978-Convert-slapi_log_error-to-a-variadic-m.patch ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

[Bug 1380152] New: perl-HTTP-Tiny 0.068 pulls in lots of new dependencies including Xorg

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380152 Bug ID: 1380152 Summary: perl-HTTP-Tiny 0.068 pulls in lots of new dependencies including Xorg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-HTTP-Tiny

Re: Non-numeric lz4 package version

You do rsplit() by the '-'. Right part is R.A. you remove arch and get release. What exactly you want to do? RPM and DNF have proper --queryformat. -Igor Gnatenko On Sep 28, 2016 8:52 PM, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > Is it permitted to have a non-numeric Version field? >

Non-numeric lz4 package version

Is it permitted to have a non-numeric Version field? The guidelines are at best unclear on this topic: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning#Version_Tag The lz4 package has version "r131": http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/lz4.git/tree/lz4.spec#n5 Corollary question: If I'm

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-09-29 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2016-09-29 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. rktime): 2016-09-29 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2016-09-29 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2016-09-29

Re: [HEADS UP] python-matplotlib-2.0.0 major update

On Monday, 26 September 2016 at 13:58, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 22 September 2016 at 15:41, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hello, > > I've just pushed (but not built) python-matplotlib-2.0.0b4 to rawhide. > > I'll be attempting to rebuild all the affected

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

> 1. NSS > 2. GNUTLS (with nettle as crypto backend, but nettle never used > directly by applications) > 3. OpenSSL > 4. libgcrypt > > and it might be reasonable to keep this as a "if possible, please prefer" policy rather than a mandate. Seems preferring gnutls over openssl is

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

This is the content of the file /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora.repo on my laptop: [fedora] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/$releasever/Everything/$basearch/os/

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 Node.js Uplift

Will bring up at the meeting.. but assume this is approved. On 28 September 2016 at 11:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:54:27 -0400 > Neal Gompa wrote: > > ...snip... > >> That's a lot of work for an update that's going to die off literally >>

Fedora Rawhide-20160928.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Workstation live x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/91 (x86_64), 1/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20160927.n.1): ID: 36765 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default

Fedora 25-20160928.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Failed openQA tests: 3/102 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20160927.n.0): ID: 36985 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL:

[Bug 1380096] New: perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.24.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380096 Bug ID: 1380096 Summary: perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.24.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Search-Xapian Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1380094] New: perl-Prima-1.49 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380094 Bug ID: 1380094 Summary: perl-Prima-1.49 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Prima Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com

[Bug 1380086] New: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.80 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380086 Bug ID: 1380086 Summary: perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.80 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-WWW-Mechanize Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 10:43 -0500, Bowen Wang wrote: > I just got up and run > dnf upgrade --refresh > It still didn't work, then I tried > dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide > The terminal output is error: no kernel packages were found. > After that I run > dnf upgrade --refresh

[Bug 1380082] New: perl-Time-HiRes-1.9740 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380082 Bug ID: 1380082 Summary: perl-Time-HiRes-1.9740 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Time-HiRes Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1380081] New: perl-Test2-Suite-0.000060 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380081 Bug ID: 1380081 Summary: perl-Test2-Suite-0.60 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test2-Suite Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - zeenix, theinric, ifarkas, mchalk

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:15:53 - "jack smith" wrote: > 2 others maintainers don't respond > > Craig Barnes (Discount) > > Eric Smith (Gsmartcontrol) Feel free to start the process for them.

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 Node.js Uplift

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 08:54:27 -0400 Neal Gompa wrote: ...snip... > That's a lot of work for an update that's going to die off literally > within days... I suggest just pushing forward with nodejs 6.x. I agree. Just push 6.x ;) kevin pgp8RlMTIS5w0.pgp Description: OpenPGP

[Bug 1380079] New: perl-Test-Needs-0.002005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380079 Bug ID: 1380079 Summary: perl-Test-Needs-0.002005 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Test-Needs Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

I just got up and run dnf upgrade --refresh It still didn't work, then I tried dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide The terminal output is error: no kernel packages were found. After that I run dnf upgrade --refresh again. My system start to upgrade. I found it pretty weird because I

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:13:34PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Is it any official Fedora policy/call to move away from openssl? As far as I know, no. There was this attempt: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation but as the top of the page notes, the effort has been

[Bug 1343053] perl-Gtk3-0.029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343053 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Following patches has been deleted: ['Gtk3-0.026-Fix-Pango-font-syntax.patch'] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1380057] perl-Params-Validate-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380057 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Failed to kick off scratch build. [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/tmp/thn-VDrNjp' -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1380057] perl-Params-Validate-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380057 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Rebase helper failed. See logs and attachments in this bugzilla RAN: '/usr/bin/git clone

[Bug 1380057] New: perl-Params-Validate-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380057 Bug ID: 1380057 Summary: perl-Params-Validate-1.25 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Params-Validate Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 447 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 441 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 373

[Bug 1380054] New: perl-PDF-Reuse-0.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380054 Bug ID: 1380054 Summary: perl-PDF-Reuse-0.39 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PDF-Reuse Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

On 28 Sep 2016, at 4:13 PM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > BTW openssl changes. > It would be good to form kind of official guidline about using those > alternative libraries and start pushing to use only one. This is not always possible. I spent a long time debugging

[Bug 1343053] perl-Gtk3-0.029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343053 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Gtk3-0.026 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1380053] New: perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380053 Bug ID: 1380053 Summary: perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Math-MatrixReal Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

* Tomasz Kłoczko [28/09/2016 15:13] : > > Is it any official Fedora policy/call to move away from openssl? We had plans to that effect a while back : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 1343053] perl-Gtk3-0.029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343053 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1205519 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1205519=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1343053] perl-Gtk3-0.029 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343053 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1380044] perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.100 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380044 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Following patches has been deleted: ['Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.01-Recode-README-to-UTF-8.patch'] -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug 1380044] perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.100 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380044 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.01.1 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug 1380044] perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.100 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380044 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1205510 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1205510=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1380044] New: perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.100 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380044 Bug ID: 1380044 Summary: perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep-1.100 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Authen-SASL-SASLprep Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Survey: What do you care about internationalization and localization, anyway?

Hi All, I am posting this for broader distribution, please help us understand how you work on i18n and l10n, thanks! http://developers.redhat.com/blog/2016/09/26/survey-what-do-you-care-about-internationalization-and-localization-anyway/ Yu Shao According to a survey conducted by Common Sense

Re: F26 System Wide Change: OpenSSL 1.1.0

BTW openssl changes. Is it any official Fedora policy/call to move away from openssl? I'm asking because I've noticed that some packages seems have been switched from openssl to gnutls. Examples of those packages is wget: * Tue Jul 26 2016 Tomas Hozza - 1.18-2 - Switched

Re: Cloud and Server Q

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 05:11:52PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > I was asked to start this in today's Server meeting. The genesis for > me was, I have more questions than answers and I'm fairly convinced > I'm not the only person who's kinda shrugging not knowing what all the > questions even are.

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-1.fc26.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.aarch64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 7 Node.js Uplift

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I updated the Bodhi update in EPEL to the latest 6.7.0 security release last > night. I just want to remind people that there remain only three days until > EOL > of 0.10.x, so I think we really need to make the

[Bug 1380005] perl-Crypt-ECB-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380005 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1380005] perl-Crypt-ECB-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380005 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1205486 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1205486=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1380005] New: perl-Crypt-ECB-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380005 Bug ID: 1380005 Summary: perl-Crypt-ECB-2.21 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Crypt-ECB Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1380005] perl-Crypt-ECB-2.21 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380005 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Crypt-ECB-2.20 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1377503] perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.9 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377503 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1205481 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1205481=edit Rebase-helper rebase-helper-debug.log log file.

[Bug 1377503] perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.9 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377503 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1377503] perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.9 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377503 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patches were not touched. All were applied properly -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1377503] perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.9 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377503 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Patching or scratch build for perl-Date-Holidays-DE-1.7 failed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 1379999] New: perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution-1.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=137 Bug ID: 137 Summary: perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution-1.54 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPAN-ParseDistribution Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1379997] New: perl-Canary-Stability-2012 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1379997 Bug ID: 1379997 Summary: perl-Canary-Stability-2012 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Canary-Stability Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] EPEL 7 Node.js Uplift

I updated the Bodhi update in EPEL to the latest 6.7.0 security release last night. I just want to remind people that there remain only three days until EOL of 0.10.x, so I think we really need to make the cut-over today or tomorrow by providing karma to push the update to stable. It takes at

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.39-1.fc26). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

This commit already existed in another branch. http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-DateTime.git/commit/?h=perl-DateTime-1.39-1.fc26=6e2e37678253df6f17a202ed542e14712ced06c7 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (perl-DateTime-1.39-1.fc25). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

From 6e2e37678253df6f17a202ed542e14712ced06c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:01:50 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.39 - New upstream release 1.39 - Replaced Params::Validate with Params::ValidationCompiler and Specio - In my benchmarks

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (f25). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

From 6e2e37678253df6f17a202ed542e14712ced06c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:01:50 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.39 - New upstream release 1.39 - Replaced Params::Validate with Params::ValidationCompiler and Specio - In my benchmarks

Re: Missing dependency in glibc package

On 09/27/2016 09:32 PM, Roman Tsisyk wrote: My package uses getprotobyname(3), getaddrinfo(3), getnameinfo(3) functions which read /etc/protocols, /etc/hosts, /etc/services and other network configuration files under the hood. Despite the fact that all these functions is an integral part of

[Bug 1376996] perl-DateTime-1.39 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376996 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pghmcfc's perl-DateTime-1.39-1.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=805080 -- You are receiving this mail

pghmcfc pushed to perl-DateTime (master). "Update to 1.39 (..more)"

From 6e2e37678253df6f17a202ed542e14712ced06c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:01:50 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.39 - New upstream release 1.39 - Replaced Params::Validate with Params::ValidationCompiler and Specio - In my benchmarks

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - zeenix, theinric, ifarkas, mchalk

Eric Smith recently give me commit rights to gsmartcontrol. ср, 28 сент. 2016 г. в 11:16, jack smith : > 2 others maintainers don't respond > > Craig Barnes (Discount) > > Eric Smith (Gsmartcontrol) > ___ > devel mailing list

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 839 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1626 puppet-2.7.26-1.el5 688 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-3849 sblim-sfcb-1.3.8-2.el5 331

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - zeenix, theinric, ifarkas, mchalk

2 others maintainers don't respond Craig Barnes (Discount) Eric Smith (Gsmartcontrol) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160927.n.1 compose check report

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 07:06:30PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > OK, I wrote a really long explanation which is below, but I'll put a > summary up here: there's some clever stuff that goes on involving the > Fedora mirror system and the repository metadata, a consequence of > which is that with

Re: Missing dependency in glibc package

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Björn Esser wrote: > > Yes, because it usually gets installed by `basesystem` and `filesystem` > packages; if those packages are missing, you broke your system anyways… > docker run -t -i fedora:24 /bin/bash [root@896ac6d48718 /]# dnf remove