On Monday, October 3, 2016 8:12:50 AM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:45:32 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for this discussion. I'll go (probably) the hacky
> > ExclusiveArch way, just because I want to give it a try. Once this
> > becomes too tiring
On Mon, 2016-10-03 at 06:10 +0200, Björn Esser wrote:
> Chain-build is running:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15917326
However it doesn't seem to work:
Error: nothing provides libjsoncpp.so.1()(64bit) needed by cmake-3.6.2-
4.fc26.x86_64
Also fc25 buildroot is broken for
On Thursday, September 22, 2016 12:45:32 PM CEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Thanks a lot for this discussion. I'll go (probably) the hacky
> ExclusiveArch way, just because I want to give it a try. Once this
> becomes too tiring (because the package has non-trivial amount of
> run-time-only dependenc
Hi folks! Sorry for the late notice - I forgot I hadn't sent this mail
- but I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting this week, as I don't
think there's anything that really needs covering. We'll have the
blocker review meeting to check in on F25 Beta status. If anyone does
have anything to discuss,
On 01/10/16 09:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/01/2016 09:30 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Now hitting an issue related to the %build part, this time failing on
>> make section.
>> The scratch build is available for viewing to see whe
Chain-build is running:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15917326
Am 03.10.2016 um 05:38 schrieb Björn Esser:
I'm upgrading jsoncpp to v1.7.7 in Rawhide. This will bump the
so-name to libjsoncpp.so.11.
Affected packages:
cmake
engrid
mrpt
orthanc
paraview
pcl
vfrnav
vrpn
I'm upgrading jsoncpp to v1.7.7 in Rawhide. This will bump the so-name
to libjsoncpp.so.11.
Affected packages:
cmake
engrid
mrpt
orthanc
paraview
pcl
vfrnav
vrpn
vtk
I'll chain-rebuild all affected packages when pushing the new version of
jsoncpp. If there isn't any trouble, I'll consider an
On 10/02/2016 02:21 AM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
On 2 October 2016 at 04:46, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 10/01/2016 02:00 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
Hi,
I'm just looking at the rpmlint errors for the xpra package, and one I
am stuck on is this:
xpra.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-var-run /var/
On 01/10/16 09:16 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 09/30/2016 11:21 PM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Removing these lines from the spec file below
>>
>> # -DBoost_INCLUDE_DIR=%{_includedir} \
>> # -DLUXRAYS_DISABLE_OPENCL:BOOL=OFF \
>> # -DCMAK
On 01/10/16 09:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>
> /builddir/build/BUILD/luxrender-lux-b3f85cf7742f/luxrender-luxrays-abd6faa839d5/src/luxrays/core/bvh/bvhembreebuild.cpp:26:40:
> fatal error: embree2/rtcore_bvh_builder.h: No such file or directory
> #include
>
> Perhaps this helps:
> http://www.lu
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Failed openQA tests: 7/102 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161001.n.0):
ID: 38006 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/38006
ID: 38011 Tes
Hi,
I have two pending reviews that I believe should be very simple to
perform, because both packages are quite small C libraries. I worked
upstream to make them packaging-friendly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=vmod-querystring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=libslz
Th
Missing expected images:
Kde live i386
Workstation live i386
Kde live x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 10/80 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161001.n.0):
ID: 37925 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_dep
On 2 October 2016 at 04:46, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 10/01/2016 02:00 PM, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm just looking at the rpmlint errors for the xpra package, and one I
>> am stuck on is this:
>>
>> xpra.x86_64: E: dir-or-file-in-var-run /var/run/xpra
>>
>> The package drops a
14 matches
Mail list logo