Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 9/92 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161014.n.0):
ID: 41462 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://open
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 140
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 08:10:53PM +0200, Björn "besser82" Esser wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a small plugin for libpurple waiting for review [1].
Reviewed.
Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 2016-10-15, 21:55 GMT, Ian Malone wrote:
> I apologise, I have clearly failed in my obligation to answer
> every one of your questions in detail and debate the use and
> existence of TeX purely on your terms. Please continue in your
> campaign to have it discontinued, I suggest you now write
On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 21:26:36 +0100
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 15 October 2016 at 18:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> [..]
>
> > * If you have specific ideas for improvements, do file bugs and
> > attach your patches or explain what you think would help. I'm sure
> > he would love to hear it.
> >
>
>
On 15 October 2016 at 20:58, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 15 October 2016 at 12:55, Ian Malone wrote:
>>
>> > What was scarry 9 years ago now is even more scary today.
>> > Will try to present you what is in texlive today over now available rpm
>> > packages.
>>
>> What exactly are you using TeX fo
On 2016-10-15, 19:58 GMT, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> You are losing the point.
> It doesn't matter how and for what I'm using TeX. I've not said even single
> word about how I'm using TeX.
Back to the point. Do you have some suggestions what to do? Any
reply to my previous email?
Matěj
--
https:/
On 15 October 2016 at 18:39, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[..]
> * If you have specific ideas for improvements, do file bugs and attach
> your patches or explain what you think would help. I'm sure he would
> love to hear it.
>
1) Package base texlive binaries with base set of necessary packages
(alph
On 15 October 2016 at 12:55, Ian Malone wrote:
> > What was scarry 9 years ago now is even more scary today.
> > Will try to present you what is in texlive today over now available rpm
> > packages.
>
> What exactly are you using TeX for? The following examples suggest you
> aren't very clear on
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:39:35AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * Perhaps we could split things up a little. I have often wondered if
> just splitting things in 5-10 packages could help, but I would
> absolutely defer to Tom here since he's been doing the work and he
> was my sponsor 10 years
Hi there,
I have a small plugin for libpurple waiting for review [1]. Any
offers?
Cheers,
Björn
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1385180
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-l
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:33:00 +0100
Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 14 October 2016 at 16:02, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Making personal attacks or calling people names is not acceptable.
> >
>
> Did I call someone name? .. hmm ??
Yes, as Adam noted you called people morons. Don't do that.
...sni
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016 08:57:19 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
...snip...
> So, we can migrate it anytime. If FESCo would like I can do so later
> today or this weekend.
>
> kevin
I've now moved this instance. Please let me or any other fesco member
know if you see anything misset or missing.
https://
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/103 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161014.n.0):
ID: 41345 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/41345
ID: 41347 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso de
OLD: Fedora-25-20161014.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161015.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 157
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 274.32 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size
Il 15/10/2016 14:21, Gerard Ryan ha scritto:
Hi all,
I no longer use the following packages nor have the time to maintain
them, so I'm going to orphan them:
Hi
for now i take these
- dtdparser
- javaewah
- jhighlight
- minimal-json
- okhttp
- openshift-java-client
regards
.g
Thanks,
Ger
Hi all,
I no longer use the following packages nor have the time to maintain
them, so I'm going to orphan them:
- aether-connector-okhttp
- dtdparser
- eclipse-jbosstools
- eclipse-m2e-core
- eclipse-webtools
- javaewah
- jboss-classpool-scoped
- jboss-reflect
- jbossxb
- jdf-stacks-client
- jhig
On 15 October 2016 at 00:03, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> "TeX live is maintained IMO by real MORONS."
>
>> is what you wrote.
>
> Yes it is.
>
> Probably you never had occasion to have closer look what exactly is
> maintained in texlive source tree.
> I had fist time been trying to contemplate what e
On 2016-10-14, 23:03 GMT, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> Probably more than 50% (if not more than 80%) of the TeX live
> is like this. Most of the resources should be archived and
> preserved for next generation cyber archeologist however now
> they should not be served as regular rpm packages because
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 09:34:50AM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:
> libmongo-client is orphaned upstream (once upon a time it was created,
> because the official driver was not properly maintained, but it's not
> the case any more). For syslog-ng we changed to the official
> mongo-c-driver with syslog
20 matches
Mail list logo
