On Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:50:33 -0600
Tim Flink wrote:
> One of the features for Taskotron that we've been planning since the
> beginning was a way for contributors to maintain their own automated
> tasks/tests which would be run during a package's lifecycle.
>
> I'm happy to say that we're almost t
Missing expected images:
Workstation live i386
Workstation live x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 8/92 (x86_64), 3/16 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20161015.n.0):
ID: 41684 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/test
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161016.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 25
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Hi all.
I'm going to orphan following packages because of lacking upstream
support or because i don't need them anymore:
ascend: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ascend/
|
|- tktable: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/thtable/
Rodent: https://admin.fedora
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 12:16:53PM +0200, Philippe Makowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firebird 3.0.1 is released, I can upgrade the package in Fedora, I have a
> Copr repo with it :
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/makowski/firebird/
>
> The problem is that Firebird 3 don't provide anymore f
On 10/04/2016 10:18 AM, Björn Esser wrote:
> All packages have been rebuilt, except for 'paraview', which FTBFS [1]
> [2]. It seems it needs a little patching for some small change in
> jsoncpp. I will do that during the next few days.
Have you had a chance to look at this? In addition to paravi
On 10/15/2016 08:32 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 11:39:35AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> * Perhaps we could split things up a little. I have often wondered if
>> just splitting things in 5-10 packages could help, but I would
>> absolutely defer to Tom here since he's been
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 09:26:36PM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> 3) Package *only* what is really need or requested by at last one person
What exactly is the *harm* in having things you are not using packaged
in Fedora? How does it affect you (or any other user of Fedora) if the
number of people
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/103 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161015.n.0):
ID: 41565 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/41565
ID: 41642 Test: x86_64 univers
OLD: Fedora-25-20161015.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161016.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 5
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 60
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 5.59 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
10 matches
Mail list logo