On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:02:43AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:15 +0100, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> > I
> > just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!!
>
> This has got to be a bug, please report it.
There are several bug reports about the
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:15 +0100, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
>> I
>> just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!!
>
> This has got to be a bug, please report it.
Since offline updates are the default, and package
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 18:30 -0500, den...@ausil.us wrote:
> I hope you really mean f25 final validation :)
yas i TYPRE gud!!111!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
I hope you really mean f25 final validation :)
Dennis
On 30 October 2016 5:44:41 pm GMT-05:00, Adam Williamson
wrote:
>Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
>any topics lined up, and we are mostly focused on Fedora 24 Final
>release validation now I think, apa
On Fri, 2016-10-28 at 22:02 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> # F25 Blocker Review meeting
> # Date: 2016-10-31
> # Time: 16:00 UTC
> # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
Of course, the correct date is 2016-10-31. Sorry for the mistake.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monke
Hi folks! I'm proposing we cancel the QA meeting tomorrow. I don't have
any topics lined up, and we are mostly focused on Fedora 24 Final
release validation now I think, apart from the re-scheduled hybrid
graphics Test Day which Sumantro and I will prepare for (that's on
2016-11-03).
If you think
On Sat, 2016-10-29 at 12:38 -0700, Evan Klitzke wrote:
> [SNIP]
> C++, Python, and Go. I write a lot about my interests on my blog at
> https://eklitzke.org/ , which lately has been a lot of low-level
> stuff related to things like x86 assembly, linkers and loaders,
> ptrace, and so on which is wha
On 10/28/2016 02:58 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> What AVC's are you seeing?
Plenty of AVC messages in the form:
type=AVC msg=audit(1477853452.023:1338): avc: denied { setattr } for
pid=23456 comm="chown" name="app_model.MYD" dev="dm-0" ino=10879938
scontext=system_u:system_r:container_t:s0:c140,
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 7/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161029.n.0):
ID: 45039 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/45039
Old failures (same test failed in R
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 10:02:43AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:15 +0100, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> > I
> > just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!!
>
> This has got to be a bug, please report it.
My packagekit cache regularly fills up
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Server boot x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Server dvd i386
Server dvd x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Server boot i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 1/22 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25-20161029.n.0):
ID: 45
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 09:15 +0100, Theodore Papadopoulo wrote:
> I
> just found that the packagekit cache on my machine is about 7Gb !!!
This has got to be a bug, please report it.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161029.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161030.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 37
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
OLD: Fedora-25-20161029.n.0
NEW: Fedora-25-20161030.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
On 10/30/2016 02:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There's two things I think are somewhat unfortunate here:
>
> 1) Both dnf and GNOME Software / PackageKit default to performing
> fairly data-hungry transactions in the background, out of the box,
> without telling you about it. GNOME's is particula
On 10/30/2016 02:26 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> * We could have some kind of configuration interface appear on install
> / first boot. This would require integration with anaconda and/or
> initial-setup and gnome-initial-setup.
>
> * We could invert the defaults and have the apps ask the user if
16 matches
Mail list logo