On Qui, 2016-11-10 at 08:08 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 5:51:51 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >
> > Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries.
> >
> > How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of
> > dependencies after
> > pac
On Wednesday, November 2, 2016 5:51:51 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Consider we have package 'foo-libs' that provides set of libraries.
>
> How do I get all dependant packages (for batch rebuild of dependencies after
> package update)? Something which takes soft dependencies into account, too.
>
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 25 Final Go/No-Go Meeting on 2016-11-10 from 17:00:00 to 19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering
meet to determine if the release c
Note the time change! Also note that James is out this week so I'll be
bumbling the way through the meeting process.
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-11-03 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
(Local time info omitted at I
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/101 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25 RC 1.1):
ID: 47037 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47037
ID: 47124 Test: x86_64 universal install_europe
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 16:02 -0800, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 01:44:25PM -0800, Japheth Cleaver wrote:
> If we really don't have a better, persistent, local name for a
> system at install time, then I don't see why reverting to
> /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 is horrible here. VG names should be
> human-readable and exist in a namespace; sh
I think Matthew is right. Maybe we could set a behaviour in Fedora
Server or Cloud and another in Fedora Workstation?
Just an idea, Sylvia
On 09/11/16 14:32, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:25:58PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
If the hostname is non-constant, can we als
On 09.11.2016 22:54, Sandro Mani wrote:
On 09.11.2016 22:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
What versions of python2-cryptography and pyOpenSSL do you have?
I'm using:
python2-cryptography-1.5.3-1.fc26.x86_64
python2-pyOpenSSL-16.2.0-1.fc26.noarch
Aha! It looks like indeed
python2-cryptography-1.5.
On 09.11.2016 22:49, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
What versions of python2-cryptography and pyOpenSSL do you have?
I'm using:
python2-cryptography-1.5.3-1.fc26.x86_64
python2-pyOpenSSL-16.2.0-1.fc26.noarch
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists
On 11/9/2016 1:30 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:58 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
On 11/09/2016 08:02 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Although this is true, one thing we could do is set a default hostname
that is static ("fedora" or similar is fine), and teach the utilities
used to
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 21:41:18 +0100
Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've noticed today that I'm unable to submit builds anymore. I get
>
> $ fedpkg build
> /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py:314:
> DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of
> Python 2.6
>
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 12:58 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
>
> On 11/09/2016 08:02 AM, Simo Sorce
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > > Although this is true, one thing we could do is set a default
hostname
> > > > that is static ("fedora" or similar is fine), and teach the
utilities
> >
Hi
I've noticed today that I'm unable to submit builds anymore. I get
$ fedpkg build
/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/pyrpkg/__init__.py:314:
DeprecationWarning: BaseException.message has been deprecated as of
Python 2.6
for (_, _, ssl_reason) in error.message:
You might want to run fedora-
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 25 Final Release Readiness Meeting on 2016-11-10 from 19:00:00 to
21:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
We will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Final
release of Fedora 25.
On 11/09/2016 12:58 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 08:02 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> Although this is true, one thing we could do is set a default hostname
>> that is static ("fedora" or similar is fine), and teach the utilities
>> used to join an AD/IPA/etc.. domain to generate a new ra
On 11/09/2016 01:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> My proposal is that we should consider changing the default hostname
>> for Fedora 26 to be either FED-XXX or FEDORA-. The
>> former allows for a longer random s
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Mac OS X and Ubuntu both require the user to pick a machine name at install
> time
> explicitly. They do not autogenerate one at all.
Sort of. If you install using the example Ubuntu preseed file then by
default it will have "u
On 11/09/2016 08:02 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
Although this is true, one thing we could do is set a default hostname
that is static ("fedora" or similar is fine), and teach the utilities
used to join an AD/IPA/etc.. domain to generate a new random hostname if
they detect the hostname is the generic "
On 9 November 2016 at 12:00, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2016-11-09, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> I was looking at rawhide (ppc64) broken deps, and was reminded of some
>> pretty old and unmaintained (upstream) kde4/smoke-based language bindings
>> (csharp, perl, ruby), affected packages include:
>>
>> kdebin
On 2016-11-09, Rex Dieter wrote:
> I was looking at rawhide (ppc64) broken deps, and was reminded of some
> pretty old and unmaintained (upstream) kde4/smoke-based language bindings
> (csharp, perl, ruby), affected packages include:
>
> kdebindings
> kimono
> perl-Qt
> ruby-korundum
> ruby-qt
>
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/17 (i386)
Old failures (same test failed in 25 Beta 1.1):
ID: 46892 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/46892
Passed openQA tests: 101/101 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386), 2/2 (arm)
New passes
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/101 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386)
ID: 46911 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/46911
ID: 47004 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/47004
I
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 09:52 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 1/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
>
> New failures (same test did not fail in 25 Beta 1.1):
>
> ID: 46790 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
> URL: https:
I was looking at rawhide (ppc64) broken deps, and was reminded of some
pretty old and unmaintained (upstream) kde4/smoke-based language bindings
(csharp, perl, ruby), affected packages include:
kdebindings
kimono
perl-Qt
ruby-korundum
ruby-qt
smokeqt
smokekde
qyoto
Of these, I can see *maybe* k
OLD: Fedora-25-20161108.n.1
NEW: Fedora-25-20161109.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0.00 B
Size of dropped packages:0.00 B
Size of
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:25:58PM -0800, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> If the hostname is non-constant, can we also arrange that, by default,
> this hostname is never sent over the network? In particular, I think
> that DHCP requests should *not* include this hostname. We're already
> starting to r
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 08:13 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/09/2016 08:02 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 23:05 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >> On 11/08/2016 06:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8
On 11/09/2016 08:02 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 23:05 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 11/08/2016 06:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On T
2016-11-03 15:08 GMT+01:00 Ray Strode :
> Hi,
>
> > Is this use case still supported by Fedora?
> It's definitely not a tested use case. Definitely worth filing a bug
> in upstream (gnome) bugzilla.
I filled https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774144
Thanks
> I wouldn't be surprised i
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 10:04 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 9.11.2016 v 00:19 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Ste
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 23:05 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 06:25 PM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/101 (x86_64), 2/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 25 Beta 1.1):
ID: 46790 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/46790
ID: 46804 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz
Taken.
Regards,
Charalampos Stratakis
Associate Software Engineer
Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
- Original Message -
From: "Bohuslav Kabrda"
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 10:01:41 AM
Subject: Orphaned several Python packages
Hi a
Dne 9.11.2016 v 00:19 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:14 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:49:42PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
SUSE generates a random name of the fo
Hi all,
since I'm no longer using following Python packages and don't have time to
maintain them, I'm orphaning them. Feel free to take them:
python-dingus
python-django-keyedcache
python-django-profile
python-django-roa
python-django-sorting
python-remoteobjects
--
Regards,
Slavek Kabrda
_
On Wed, 2016-11-09 at 00:36 -0800, rawh...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 25 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the curr
I will update kpmcore in rawhide to latest development version, so there
will be a soname bump.
Packages affected are kde-partitionmanager (which I will rebuild) and
calamares.
Mattia
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubs
40 matches
Mail list logo
