[Bug 1398905] New: perl-MooseX-Singleton-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398905 Bug ID: 1398905 Summary: perl-MooseX-Singleton-0.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooseX-Singleton Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

eseyman uploaded MooseX-Singleton-0.30.tar.gz for perl-MooseX-Singleton

a2d2bf2bd122505a11d4079b653d93d1 MooseX-Singleton-0.30.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-MooseX-Singleton/MooseX-Singleton-0.30.tar.gz/md5/a2d2bf2bd122505a11d4079b653d93d1/MooseX-Singleton-0.30.tar.gz ___ perl-devel

request for new isomaster in EPEL

Hello, the version listet here has a bug (limit on 4.2 GB) The actual version 1.3.13 has the correction. It would be nice to have it EPEL6 and EPEL7. Thanks and beste regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

request for new isomaster in EPEL

Hello, the version listet here has a bug (limt on 4.2 GB) The actual version 1.3.13 has the correction. It would be nice to have it EPEL6 and EPEL7. Thanks and beste regards ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

eseyman pushed to perl-Text-Reflow (master). "Update to 1.12"

From 0adf478d352f163d818bcc9844cf3178011b84dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2016 08:47:22 +0100 Subject: Update to 1.12 --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Text-Reflow.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

eseyman uploaded Text-Reflow-1.12.tar.gz for perl-Text-Reflow

4856e00bdc21aa1adcb7636a722894ac Text-Reflow-1.12.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-Text-Reflow/Text-Reflow-1.12.tar.gz/md5/4856e00bdc21aa1adcb7636a722894ac/Text-Reflow-1.12.tar.gz ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Nautilus usability

This is about F25 and F24, but likely applies to older releases, too, since I haven't noticed any improvements about it. Have you ever made Nautilus copy/move a huge directory tree and then started a similar task for other directories while Nautilus was still working on the first task? What

Re: Self Introduction: Fabio Valentini (decathorpe)

Hello Dominik, Thanks for the welcome, and for sponsoring me! On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 7:35 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski < domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > Hello, Fabio. > Welcome to Fedora community! > > On Thursday, 24 November 2016 at 22:34, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Here goes my

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

On 11/26/2016 12:31 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM: >> >> Hey all, >> >> In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get >> differing >> outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings >> like: >> >>

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM: Hey all, In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

On Sex, 2016-11-25 at 20:32 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 02:24 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > > Every release we got always tones of updates in day 0, on upgrades > > and > > non-live versions everyone will update the computer , if we use > > netinstall iso already

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

On 26/11/16 16:35, Dusty Mabe wrote: In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is causing pain for

[Bug 1398750] The biber and texlive-biblatex versions in F25 are incompatible.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398750 Colin Macdonald changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(tcallawa@redhat.c |

[Bug 1398750] The biber and texlive-biblatex versions in F25 are incompatible.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398750 --- Comment #4 from Colin Macdonald --- I submitted this: I don't have a F25 system yet so I unchecked auto-stable. Will push to stable once I personally test on 25 (or of course if others +1 it). -- You are receiving this

[Bug 1398750] The biber and texlive-biblatex versions in F25 are incompatible.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398750 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- biber-2.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ddeb75a491 -- You are receiving this mail because:

new gemspec behavior in rawhide

Hey all, In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is causing pain for me because I actually patch

Fedora Rawhide-20161126.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/79 (x86_64), 4/15 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20161125.n.0): ID: 49852 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso

pghmcfc pushed to perl-CPAN-Meta-Check (perl-CPAN-Meta-Check-0.014-1.fc26). "Update to 0.014 (..more)"

From fc416c0f234b56e12e16b7f6c2f2ec6e07610e0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 15:28:46 + Subject: Update to 0.014 - New upstream release 0.014 - Undef versions are now passed through to CPAN::Meta::Requirements for the check, rather

pghmcfc pushed to perl-CPAN-Meta-Check (master). "Update to 0.014 (..more)"

From fc416c0f234b56e12e16b7f6c2f2ec6e07610e0c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2016 15:28:46 + Subject: Update to 0.014 - New upstream release 0.014 - Undef versions are now passed through to CPAN::Meta::Requirements for the check, rather

pghmcfc uploaded CPAN-Meta-Check-0.014.tar.gz for perl-CPAN-Meta-Check

ccd4448a7b08e1e3ef6f475030b282c9 CPAN-Meta-Check-0.014.tar.gz http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/pkgs/perl-CPAN-Meta-Check/CPAN-Meta-Check-0.014.tar.gz/md5/ccd4448a7b08e1e3ef6f475030b282c9/CPAN-Meta-Check-0.014.tar.gz ___ perl-devel

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20161126.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20161125.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20161126.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 60 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

On Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:47:01 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > It's worth remembering that upgrade path breakage really isn't that big > of a deal these days. dnf-system-upgrade has done a distro-sync (not > 'upgrade') for several releases now, and the instructions for upgrading > directly with dnf

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

>>> On 11/25/2016 05:51 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >>> So we already do pretty much what you outline above. I started the first push to f25-updates on the Friday before the release. >>> >>> >>> I think, we are talking past each other. >>> >>> You seem to be referring to "the freeze" in

Re: Upgrade path violations in F25

Adam Williamson wrote: > If we were going to do this, there would be no point having a freeze in > the first place. It'd be absurd to have a freeze, then cut release > images that ignored it. So abolish the freeze? The live respins that do not use any kind of freeze tend to just work, they're

Re: upstream dev. asks suggestions about howto make packagers work easier (bundled libraries, etc.)

On 21 November 2016 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: >> In Debian we have https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide >> I guess more official, cross-distro document that we all point upstream >> authors to

Re: upstream dev. asks suggestions about howto make packagers work easier (bundled libraries, etc.)

On 21 November 2016 at 21:49, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM, Piotr Ozarowski wrote: >> In Debian we have https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide >> I guess more official, cross-distro document that we all point upstream >> authors to