On Sunday, January 15, 2017 8:13:42 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> (which users are often a bit to setup ..
s/a bit/a bit lazy/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sunday, January 15, 2017 12:30:51 AM CET Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 15.01.2017 um 01:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >> >== No nee
Missing expected images:
Cloud_base qcow2 x86_64
Atomic qcow2 x86_64
Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64
Atomic raw-xz x86_64
Failed openQA tests: 24/103 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170111.n.0):
ID: 54791 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 15.01.2017 um 01:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
>> >== No need for static allocation, afaict
>> >games, man, slocate, squid, named, postgres, my
Hi all,
Just a heads-up: I just built lua-lpeg 1.0.1 for Rawhide. The release notes
does not seem to suggest any significant API change, but just to be sure we
should probably let it sit in Rawhide for a while.
On the packaging side, turns out Lua is not available by default in the
mock root, and
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 26 Rawhide 20170114.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
On 14/01/17 06:45 AM, Rich Mattes wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga
> wrote:
>> Here is an attempt at building YafaRay using scratch build:
>>
>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673
>>
>>
>> An issue is somehow OpenCV will not meet a requirement
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:45:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Adam Williamson
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> >> And being afraid of
>> >> switching to a
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 01:17:52AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 15.01.2017 um 01:13 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> >== No need for static allocation, afaict
> >games, man, slocate, squid, named, postgres, mysql, nscd,
> >rpcuser, rpc, rpm, ntp, mailman, gdm, utempter, apache, smms
Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Cool. Let's provide 'pkgconf' so we can be also three, too! But at the
> same time please consider not dropping 'pkgconfig' for no reason.
It's not "no reason". The reason is to provide a drop-in replacement, which
necessarily requires using the same binary name. At that
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/setup.git/tree/uidgid has a list
of "soft static" uids and gids.
Currently FPC has a process for allocating new numbers on this list,
but here's a number of static uid/gid allocations from old times,
which are not necessary. Dropping them will allow those numbers
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:46 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides
>> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added
>> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub implementation in
>> p
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi Neal!
>
> On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's
>> > interests.;
>>
>> I strongly believe in Fedora's Foundations[0], which include
Hello,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> You argue that the change should be mostly painless, but without
>> providing any details: why not rebuild a 10 or 100 or 1000 packages
>> in a mock root with
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> And being afraid of
>> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of
>> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used for
>> over a decade is co
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 19:35 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> You argue that the change should be mostly painless, but without
> providing any details: why not rebuild a 10 or 100 or 1000 packages
> in a mock root with pkgconf-pkg-config? Even if there are some minor
> hiccups, at least w
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:16:18PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 01/13/2017 12:03 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > On 01/13/2017 11:30 AM, Michael Mraka wrote:
> >> Przemek Klosowski:
> >>> Easy access to debug information is very well done in Fedora, and is
> >>> one of its most empowering
Fabio, sorry for do not star a new thread, but there is a way to help you
with the packaging of pantheon in Fedora?
Some package than new review or than need to be packaged?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:45:48AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Adam Williamson
> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> And being afraid of
> >> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of
> >> pkg-config just becau
Hello Wesley,
I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop
components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests
for becoming a co-maintaner of plank (since that package is obviously also
part of a Pantheon DE and ties in with the other packages I am main
Hello Johannes,
I am working on getting all the elementary apps and pantheon desktop
components into fedora and wondered if you could approve my ACL Requests
for becoming a co-maintaner of elementary-icon-theme (since that package
obviously ties in with the other packages I am now maintaining, see
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides
>> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added
>> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub implementation in
>> pkgconfig.
I just backported the upstream patch for adding support for Octave 4.2
to SWIG in Rawhide. Build is running [1].
Cheers
Björn
[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17285610
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Neal Gompa wrote:
> Because pkgconf supports the full specification, including Provides
> rules. pkgconfig does not. It's been *years* and they never added
> support for it. It's even documented to be a stub implementation in
> pkgconfig. As a result of pkgconf fully implementing the Provides
> rul
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Jonathon Reinhart
wrote:
> Daniel, thanks for presenting this so clearly; I think you're spot-on. Has
> there been any progress on this?
qemu-user-static has been shipping in Fedora qemu builds since qemu
2.6.0-5 in Fedora 24. :)
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there'
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 17:17 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Friday, January 13, 2017 6:33:49 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 10:30 -0500, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Readline-7.0 was released few months ago and I have rebased it in
> > > rawhide to ver
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi Neal!
>
> On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's
>> > interests.;
>>
>> I strongly believe in Fedora's Foundations[0], which include a comm
On Friday, January 13, 2017 6:33:49 PM CET Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-01-13 at 10:30 -0500, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Readline-7.0 was released few months ago and I have rebased it in
> > rawhide to version 7.0. I have created a compatibility package
> > compat-readline
Daniel, thanks for presenting this so clearly; I think you're spot-on. Has
there been any progress on this?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Neal!
On Saturday, January 14, 2017 9:51:39 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> > I hope no. Can you be precise here? I'm all for protecting Fedora's
> > interests.;
>
> I strongly believe in Fedora's Foundations[0], which include a commitment to
> "excellence" and "innovation".
I hope it all is abo
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 10:30 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> And being afraid of
>> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of
>> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used for
>> over a decade is contra
On Sat, 2017-01-14 at 09:51 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> And being afraid of
> switching to a different and fully compatible implementation of
> pkg-config just because it's not the implementation we've used for
> over a decade is contrary to those values.
But...you just said yourself it's not "full
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Saturday, January 14, 2017 7:45:05 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 12:20 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga
wrote:
> Here is an attempt at building YafaRay using scratch build:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17274673
>
>
> An issue is somehow OpenCV will not meet a requirement due to this error
> below:
>
> -- Found opencv, v
On Saturday, January 14, 2017 7:45:05 AM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM C
On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 7:10 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
>> >> Doh I missed this. This is now approved due to
Ah, sorry, just saw the reason budgie orphaned is that, the upstream is
deleted.
On 01/14/2017 08:29 PM, Zamir SUN wrote:
I'll take budgie.
On 01/13/2017 06:56 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless
I'll take budgie.
On 01/13/2017 06:56 AM, opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://
On Friday, January 13, 2017 1:18:34 PM CET Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> > On Friday, January 13, 2017 5:54:41 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> >> Doh I missed this. This is now approved due to "bootstrapping issue". So
> >> the
> >> way to use "old"
39 matches
Mail list logo
