Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 00:53:05 +0100 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hans de Goede wrote: > > Well, that is a fix, but the real problem is that either the new > > libglvnd enabled mesa should not be in updates-stable and thus not > > in the buildroot; or both the new libglvnd enabled mesa and the new > > lib

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hans de Goede wrote: > Well, that is a fix, but the real problem is that either the new libglvnd > enabled mesa should not be in updates-stable and thus not in the > buildroot; or both the new libglvnd enabled mesa and the new libglvnd > should be in updates-stable. This is the result of 4 very po

Re: F25 updates/updates-testing failures in bodhi

2017-01-29 Thread Kevin Kofler
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > We do have a staging bodhi setup. The problem is that the composes are > done with the contents of the compose. So, when a new rpm-ostree update > is submitted to f25-updates-testing that very new update is used in the > compose. I don't think it's practical to first try every

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/29/2017 08:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:12:59 +0100 Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 01/29/2017 05:23 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Allrighty… Looks like the override for libglvnd somehow got untagged… Just re-tagged in f25-build… Should be fixed now. Well,

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:12:59 +0100 Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 01/29/2017 05:23 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > > Allrighty… Looks like the override for libglvnd somehow got > > untagged… Just re-tagged in f25-build… Should be fixed now. > > Well, that is a fix, but the real prob

Re: [embree] patch refused to be applied

2017-01-29 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
On 29/01/17 06:46 AM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > On 01/29/2017 12:37 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: >> Hello team, >> >> I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept >> on failing >> >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254 >> >> I include the patch f

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 01/29/2017 05:23 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Allrighty… Looks like the override for libglvnd somehow got untagged… Just re-tagged in f25-build… Should be fixed now. Well, that is a fix, but the real problem is that either the new libglvnd enabled mesa should not be in updates

Re: Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Allrighty… Looks like the override for libglvnd somehow got untagged… Just re-tagged in f25-build… Should be fixed now. Am 29.01.2017 um 17:19 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Hi there! The Fedora 25 buildroot on Koji is b0rk3n… :( DEBUG util.py:435: Error: nothing provides libGL.so.1()

Fedora 25 Koji buildroots broken…

2017-01-29 Thread Björn 'besser82' Esser
Hi there! The Fedora 25 buildroot on Koji is b0rk3n… :( DEBUG util.py:435: Error: nothing provides libGL.so.1()(64bit) needed by muffin-devel-3.2.1-1.fc25.x86_64. DEBUG util.py:435: nothing provides libEGL.so.1()(64bit) needed by clutter-1.26.0-1.fc25.x86_64. DEBUG util.py:435: nothing pro

Re: [embree] patch refused to be applied

2017-01-29 Thread Mukundan Ragavan
On 01/29/2017 12:37 AM, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > Hello team, > > I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept > on failing > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254 > > I include the patch for preview so someone can see what went wrong. > > T

Re: gperf 3.1 changes the type of the hash 'len' parameter

2017-01-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 09:09:14AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I pushed gperf 3.1 to Rawhide. > > This changes the type of one of the parameters of the generated > perfect hash function: > > -char *in_word_set (register const char *str, register unsigned int len); > +char *in_word_set (reg

Re: ImportError: No module named kivy, when run make html

2017-01-29 Thread Mathieu Bridon
On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 09:51 +, Martin Gansser wrote: > thanks for your answer. > > my question is, should i build for both python version the html files > ? > cd doc && make html PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.linux-%{_arch}- > %{python2_version} > cd .. > cd doc && make html PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.

Re: ImportError: No module named kivy, when run make html

2017-01-29 Thread Martin Gansser
thanks for your answer. my question is, should i build for both python version the html files ? cd doc && make html PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.linux-%{_arch}-%{python2_version} cd .. cd doc && make html PYTHONPATH=../build/lib.linux-%{_arch}-%{python3_version}

Re: [embree] patch refused to be applied

2017-01-29 Thread Tom Hughes
On 29/01/17 05:37, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: I applied a patch sent by upstream but some odd reason, the build kept on failing https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17472254 I include the patch for preview so someone can see what went wrong. You need -p1 when applying the patch.