Re: Qt 5.8 coming to rawhide

On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 12:04:36 -0500 Rex Dieter wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Mostly fyi/heads-up, > > > > kde-sig members imported Qt 5.8 into git over the weekend (kudos to > > heliocastro for initial packaging/copr and kkofler for merging > > import), and > > bootstrap builds are under way.

[Test-Announce] 2017-04-03 @ 1600 UTC ** Fedora Blocker Review Proposal to Cancel

Greetings testers! We had a long run of blocker reviews the past couple weeks, and there's currently only one proposal for Beta and one for Final. I think we can take this week off and focus on finding more blocker proposals for next week! Thanks! // Mike -- Fedora QA

Re: last Spyder IDE under Fedora from Spyder 2.3.9 to the last

On 04/02/2017 05:46 PM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: > the problem with build from source under Fedora distro of the last > Spyder IDE > > https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/4318 > Yes. Some of spyder dependencies were recently built and I was away. I will update to 3.x this week. --

last Spyder IDE under Fedora from Spyder 2.3.9 to the last

the problem with build from source under Fedora distro of the last Spyder IDE https://github.com/spyder-ide/spyder/issues/4318 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency

On 2 April 2017 at 17:06, Jens Lody wrote: > Fedora Packaging Committee: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee?rd=FPC > Just humle question: why I should contact FPC about two bugs which I found in dnf? Comment about contacting FPC was straight under my comment about these bugs. T

Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency

On 2 April 2017 at 16:25, Reindl Harald wrote: > funny that one assumes you can enter "fedora FPC" in a search engine after > playing smart-ass in so many mails and it's your namend responisiblity to > inform yourself about the distribution *before* you write hundrets of > completly unqualified a

Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency

Am Sun, 2 Apr 2017 13:23:25 +0100 schrieb Tomasz Kłoczko : > On 2 April 2017 at 12:20, Igor Gnatenko > wrote: > > > All your points here are basically going to /dev/null if you are not > > going to contact FPC > > > > Funny .. seems you assuming that I know what FPC stands fr. > > kloczek

looking for GLPK maintainer / Conrad Meyer

Hi, Apologies in advance for the SPAM. I'm trying to reach the GLPK maintainer, who I believe might be Conrad Meyer: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/glpk/ and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Konradm I'm trying to help package latest upstream: https://bugzilla.redhat.c

Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency

On 2 April 2017 at 12:20, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > All your points here are basically going to /dev/null if you are not > going to contact FPC > Funny .. seems you assuming that I know what FPC stands fr. kloczek -- Tomasz Kłoczko | LinkedIn: *http://lnkd.in/FXPWxH * _

Re: Unversioned Obsoletes (was Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency)

On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote: > On 2017-03-31 4:04 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> >> On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:16:22 -0400, Fernando Nasser wrote: >> >>> A few issues I remember caused by unversioned Obsoletes (before they >>> were banished to Hell) were: >>> >>> - Not being

Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2017-04-02 at 07:55 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 1 April 2017 at 22:25, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > This is a libsolv test case. Fedora's high level package manager > > (DNF[0]) uses libsolv[1] for its resolver engine. If you're trying > >

Re: Mass issue: /usr/bin/env dependency

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Sun, 2017-04-02 at 07:55 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > On 1 April 2017 at 22:25, Neal Gompa wrote: > > > This is a libsolv test case. Fedora's high level package manager > > (DNF[0]) uses libsolv[1] for its resolver engine. If you're trying > >